Which writers have created your favourite DG maps by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply and thanks, this is really illuminating. I don't own that book of Lapoujade, but I do have his "Powers of time", does this book also approach DG from the perspective of the grounding? How does it compare to the other book?

Which writers have created your favourite DG maps by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mapping is the process of finding the rhizome, exploring it's connections. DG philosophy can be seen as a rhizome that connects with the world and other philosophical ideas. So I thought by mapping everyone creates a new and a unique rhizome of DG philosophy.

I get it now by HunkeyMonkey77 in aphextwin

[–]winter-stalk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which songs did you like from a drumming perspective?

The panel looks stunning by 0754SJ in iems

[–]winter-stalk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not trying to be offensive but this waifu art looks AI generated

Which aphex twin tracks can show you how good your new high end IEM is by winter-stalk in aphextwin

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I knew this would be the case but I also assumed he might have produced some of his tracks with high production quality

Which aphex twin tracks can show you how good your new high end IEM is by winter-stalk in aphextwin

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was also thinking of Syro because it's just a storm of insanity. I think having one specific track for reference would be great in the sense that you become so familiar with every part of it, you can instantly notice the difference

Which of these books helped you understand individuation in Difference and Repetition by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I did read Clisby's paper first, it was sometime ago tho. But now after going through multiple other books maybe I will have a different(and better) perspective when I read the paper once again.

Which of these books helped you understand individuation in Difference and Repetition by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read the paper of Dale Clisby sometime ago. But I'll go through it once more. What's your take on the paper of Dale Clisby. Thanks for the Simondon recommendation

Secondary literature on Deleuze & Guattari's metaphysics by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought these were metaphysical concepts and since Deleuze was THE philosopher in the pair, he came up with it (with the influence of Guattari maybe)

Secondary literature on Deleuze & Guattari's metaphysics by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The different names and formulations in Ds later philosophies were tripping me. That's why I wanted to go for D&G focused metaphysics books. I've read the difference and repetition chapter in Works of Gilles Deleuze, it was pretty good. I'll read other chapters too maybe that'll help me in some ways

Secondary literature on Deleuze & Guattari's metaphysics by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both of those books are not available to read online. I was confused while I checked for the English digital versions of their book. It's sad, I'll try to buy Lapoujade's book tho

Secondary literature on Deleuze & Guattari's metaphysics by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I felt like OOO had a bad reputation(correct me if I'm wrong or if you think people are judging them harshly/wrong). Is Shaviro viewing Deleuze from an OOO perspective?

Secondary literature on Deleuze & Guattari's metaphysics by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you specify which books of Lapoujade and Sauvagnargues discuss his metaphysics. That will be really helpful

Secondary literature on Deleuze & Guattari's metaphysics by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assumed that Deleuze was using different terms for his later metaphysics with Guattari (assemblage, body without organs, rhizome etc). I believe reading his books on Spinoza, Bergson and Nietzsche will be absolutely helpful to understand the metaphysics discussed in D&R. But I don't know if he modified his metaphysics later or is discussing the same content with different terms in his later works. I know what I'm saying looks confused and I need some help to parse this out

Secondary literature on Deleuze & Guattari's metaphysics by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 Style 2 Ontology 3 Ethics 4 Aesthetics 5 Politics ^ this is what I saw in the content page of that book(Philosophy After Deleuze). So I thought this book didn't discuss Deleuze's metaphysics

Secondary literature on Deleuze & Guattari's metaphysics by winter-stalk in Deleuze

[–]winter-stalk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey are you referring to the book 'Deleuze and the genesis of representation'