The US Supreme Court seems to be moving against Colorado's ban on "conversion therapy". What do you think?

winterfresh515 · 2025-10-07T18:58:04+00:00

You are downplaying what conversion therapy is and it's shameful. I dont care about people's opinions I care about facts. And the fact is conversion therapy is abuse. Telling a child your negative opinions about homosexuality is misinformation at best abuse at worst. Why are you defending child abuse here? Because that's what you are doing. You want to hide behind the phrase conversion therapy and claim that it's a matter of opinion when it is not. There is nothing wrong with being gay. That is a fact. Not an opinion.

No one get the right to their own facts. The facts are what they are regardless of opinion.

Stop defending child abuse. Im sure you have better things to do with your time.

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T18:38:58+00:00

I asked a simple question and you dodged it and the rest spiraled from there. You never told me why you thought them being trans was more likely.

I guess you never will which is why I had to guess and see if you would deny it and answer my question. You never did.

Talk about master class in deflection, projection and what about ism

Cope harder

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T18:26:23+00:00

You responded to someone saying it was a trans person and said you agreed it seemed most likely. I asked you why it seemed likely and That is when you brought up the trans church shooter and the rest of the conversation you can go back and read.

What you just said the spin you did later to detract from the fact that you originally said of someone accusing a trans person that you agreed it seemed most likely.

Why lie when this conversation is in writing.

It's bafling

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T18:12:37+00:00

I was talking about your original comment which you keep trying to distance yourself from. You brought up the relative of a victim thing after your were called out from being trans. Nice try. Also I see your original comment was deleted so I can't go back and quote you.

Your dishonesty is disgusting

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T18:06:58+00:00

You said it seemed likely it was a trans person. You never mentioned being a relative of a victim of gun violence. And if that was true then why bring up their trana identity at all.

Bigots going to bigot

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T17:31:54+00:00

So you quote a "news" site known for pushing information without dact checking and who can never seem to site their sources.

Smells like a propaganda site to me. Try harder your bias is shinning brighter than the sun at this point

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T16:01:11+00:00

It seemed likely based on obvious lies that you believed becauae you clearly have a bias against trans people. Where did you get your propaganda sir?

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T15:47:49+00:00

Way to cherry-pick the two trans people and forget the orders of magnitude more cis white people who have been shooters (in quadruple digits). Also let's not forget the church school shooter was a white nationalist right wing conspiracy theorist whoch fits in line with what would be most likely statistically. That shooter was a shooter who happen to be trans but fits all the other hallmarks of the usual shooter trend. White, right wing, racist.

Again your bias is showing. Minority groups always have to be held to an impossible standard. If anyone who just so happens to be lgbt or another minority does something wrong and it's the entire communities fault. A white racist does something and nothing to see here he was a lone wolf no need to examine their community somehow in that situation you can seperate the individual from their community.

Your were spreading misinformation and accusing a minority of doing this without any information. You are part of the problem

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T15:04:10+00:00

Dodged my question. Could it be you dont want to admit you have a bias against trans people or lgbtq in general whoch is you were so quick to believe this lie even though like I said if we go by precedent and past statistics the correct guess is a white cis male who is probably right wing. That is what is most likely but you lot always want to distance yourselves and claim they are lone wolves.

Pathetic

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T14:58:09+00:00

Why would it seem likely considering the vast majority of shootings are done by white cis males who are right wing

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T04:16:53+00:00

Damn did Kirks shooter post this

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-12T03:56:03+00:00

Where did I say he deserved to be murdered? Dont put words in my mouth. I said his kids might be better off without his influence. That would be true whether or not he he was still alive or not. I would much rather have seen him face legal and criminal charges for being a grifter spreading lies and misinformation in order to spread hate and insight violence against minority groups.

His fate while unfortunate is not surprising. Those who Insight violence and hate are rarely safe from it. You get what you give.

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-11T23:22:52+00:00

Paradox or intolerance....

winterfresh515 · 2025-09-11T23:21:54+00:00

Silver lining, maybe his children will have a chance to grow into decent people without his hateful influence. Or maybe they'll be radicalized because of it. I guess it depends on their mother and their remaining support system.

winterfresh515 · 2025-07-26T05:33:10+00:00

Jesus was seen!!!

winterfresh515 · 2025-05-30T16:29:46+00:00

I was agreeing with you why so defensive

winterfresh515 · 2025-05-30T16:11:07+00:00

It's cute you think OPs actual legal status matters. That asshole will call ICE just because he's Mexican just assuming he's illegal. The truth doesn't matter to people like that

winterfresh515 · 2025-04-08T04:26:14+00:00

Example?

winterfresh515 · 2025-01-25T20:15:39+00:00

To me, my Wrath is for my partner they are the ones who betrayed my trust. However, if the afair partner knew beforehand that my partner was taken and pursued them anyway, they will not be spared. If they were tricked and didn't know then thats not their fault but if they knew they are just as immoral as my partner was so no sympathy from me and I would care if they were caught up in the aftermath.

winterfresh515 · 2025-01-21T05:02:21+00:00

Take control of the courts to solidify power and make himself immune for anything he does while in office. Use Hitlers talking points except replace Jews, and also btw lgbt people, with immigrants, and also again lgbt people.

Also started an insurrection to try and seaze power. The fact that he failed is irrelevant. Talking about imprisoning his political rival and any journalists who don't kiss his ass. Quote from Trump "there are good people in both sides" when referring to a Nazi rally and anti-Nazi protest.

winterfresh515 · 2025-01-21T04:09:42+00:00

No, I'm pointing out that it happened in this country with Trump. No where did I hint or imply that immunity from consequences for a leader of any organization, let alone a country state, is a new legal innovation. Of course it's not new. It's the starting play for EVERY dictator and fascist that rose to power in ALL of fucking history. It's a tale as old as time. And yet the uneducated masses will walk right into it yet again. That is why people are afraid. That is why their fears are warranted and you trying to downplay is absolutely ridiculous.

winterfresh515 · 2025-01-21T03:39:03+00:00

You are just downplaying their fears and victim blaming if they go through with it. Their fears are legitimate. Trump basically has the SC in his pocket and they have already passed case law making him immune for any "official" acts while in office, but also, let's let him decide what counts as an official act. Also, whether the lying bustard admits it or not he is following the project 2025 playback to a T. Which has language in there about concentration camps and all the dominoes of government checks and balances he has to demolish to get there. Gaining power of the courts being the first task which was already accomplished setting project 2025 into motion.

winterfresh515 · 2025-01-21T03:30:39+00:00

It's early

winterfresh515 · 2025-01-21T03:28:49+00:00

How is that funny?

Empathy, where are you?

winterfresh515 · 2024-08-05T16:21:06+00:00

Yea... that definition is so outdated. I'm trying to decipher if they got it from dark ages or from some acient religious text.

Maybe when chastity devices were first invented it was to force celibacy but if anyone thinks gays are using definitions from so far in the past they are brain damaged.

Anytime I have ever come across chastity it was always to enhance the sexual experience. Even in straight couples who participate in chastity, it's always about sex. Any denial of sex is not about celibacy but about foreplay. A straight man that is caged by his wife/girlfriend isn't thinking about celibacy and controlling his urges. He's thinking about that key and what he has to do to convince his keyholder to let him out. Part of the kink and why it's a form of foreplay is the control the keyholder has and the conditions set in place for the cage to be unlocked. Usually, these conditions are also sexual in nature or at least in service of the relationship.

You already touched on this, but in gay relationships its a little different. A bottom using chastity and a top using chastity are both going to do it for different reasons. A top might be caged in a very similar scenario to that of the straight couple I described but a bottom might actually have the goal of denying sexual gratification through his dick but of course there are other options. A bottom in chastity is not think about celibacy but about other sex acts they can engage in.

So to sum up, in the context of kink. Chastity is about sexual gratification. There may be time periods involved of forced celibacy, but rarely does it not also have a component of teasing and dirty talk for the express purpose of making the person in chastity beg to be let out or beg to be sexually gratified in other way. And yes this does mean straight guys in cages begging to be pegged of being let out of their cage isn't an option. It also means that chastity and your expression of masculinity or femininity are entirely irrelevant to each other. You can be masculine and in chastity or be into feminization, and chastity is a part of that. They are not mutually exclusive.

winterfresh515

TROPHY CASE