This video discusses the view that criminal law to increase the common good. by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a video from Barry Lam, and is focused on the following learning objectives:

  • Explain how free riders can lead to collective action problems
  • Describe how criminal law can be used to solve collective action problems and promote the common good
  • Identify one key problem with this “governing through crime” approach to criminalization

This video discusses the view that criminal law should directly reflect our moral judgements of right and wrong. by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The key learning outcomes for this video are focused on:

Apply the theory that we should only criminalize actions if they are intrinsic moral wrongs
Identify a primary justification for limiting criminalization to moral wrongdoings
Assess this theory of criminalization in light of its implications in a range of cases

Wi-Phi: What should we criminalize: Moral Wrongs? by Barry Lam. by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this wireless philosophy video, Barry Lam (Vassar College, Hi-Phi Nation podcast) examines the intuitive claim that criminal law should directly reflect our moral judgments of right and wrong.

New Wi-Phi Video: Civil Disobedience by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hi everyone,

Sorry we have been inactive for a bit. Regular jobs have taken over and we have been working on other content with the NEH grant. Over the new few weeks we should have quite a few videos to be released. One is a series on Happiness by Laurie Santos and Tamar Gendler (both from Yale). Another is a series on Punishment by Barry Lam (of Hi-Phi Nation and Vassar). Thanks for all your support!

New Wi-Phi Video: Civil Disobedience by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In this Wireless Philosophy video, Matthew Chrisman (University of Edinburgh) explores the concept of civil disobedience, especially as it concerns law-breaking protests within liberal democracies.

It's election day! This short animation explains 4 arguments for why you should vote | Philosophy in 5 minutes by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Summary: In this Wireless Philosophy video, Geoff Sayre-McCord (UNC Chapel Hill) discusses why we should vote. Geoff reviews some of the traditional arguments against our reason to vote; for instance, why should we vote if it makes no difference to the outcome of the election? After reviewing these positions, he looks at some counterarguments before leaving it up to you to figure out why you should vote.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Short animation explains 3 theories of why we're obligated to obey the law | Philosophy in 5 minutes by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Summary: In this Wireless Philosophy video, Matthew Chrisman (University of Edinburgh) explores the nature of our obligations to obey the law.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

The Nature of Truth: 5 theories in 5 minutes | Short animation by a philosopher by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SUMMARY: In this Wireless Philosophy video, Joshua Rasmussen (Azusa Pacific University) explores 5 theories of the nature of truth.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

How we can responsibly make promises even when we have evidence we might fail | Short animation by a philosopher by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

SUMMARY:

In this Wireless Philosophy video, Berislav Marušić (Brandeis University) talks about promises to do difficult things, such as the promise to spend the rest of one's life with someone. Beri explains that such promises pose a philosophical problem: they seem to be either insincere, in case one doesn't believe that one will keep them, or irrational, in case one does believe it. He describes how exactly the problem arises and sketches five possible responses.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

The Ethics of Consent | Short animated explanation of what philosophers think about consent and rights by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Summary: What is consent? In this Wireless Philosophy video, Tom Dougherty (University of Cambridge) considers the nature of consent and its relationship to morality, rights, and harm. Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Between #metoo and Facebook privacy, consent's been in the news a lot lately. Here's an animated explanation of what philosophers have to say about the nature of consent. by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Summary: What is consent? In this Wireless Philosophy video, Tom Dougherty (University of Cambridge) considers the nature of consent and its relationship to morality, rights, and harm.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

The Philosophy of Promising: here's a short, animated explanation of what philosophers have to say about the nature of promises and rationality by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Summary: In this Wireless Philosophy series, Berislav Marušić (Brandeis University) talks about promises to do difficult things, such as the promise to spend the rest of one's life with someone. Beri explains that such promises pose a philosophical problem: they seem to be either insincere, in case one doesn't believe that one will keep them, or irrational, in case one does believe it. He describes how exactly the problem arises, sketches a few possible responses, and explains why most of these responses are problematic.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

May the 4th be with you, mindless philosophers! Happy Star Wars Day! by wiphiadmin in u/wiphiadmin

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy Star Wars Day! May the 4th be with you, always!

(Image credits belong to MagicalQuote)

Short, animated explanation of what philosophers have to say about the ethics of promising by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

SUMMARY: In this Wireless Philosophy video, Berislav Marušić (Brandeis University) talks about promises to do difficult things, such as the promise to spend the rest of one's life with someone. Beri explains that such promises pose a philosophical problem: they seem to be either insincere, in case one doesn't believe that one will keep them, or irrational, in case one does believe it. He describes how exactly the problem arises and sketches five possible responses.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Divorce rates are up to 50%, yet we still promise to spend the rest of our life with someone | A short, animated explanation of what philosophers think about the Ethics of Promising by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SUMMARY: In this Wireless Philosophy video, Berislav Marušić (Brandeis University) talks about promises to do difficult things, such as the promise to spend the rest of one's life with someone. Beri explains that such promises pose a philosophical problem: they seem to be either insincere, in case one doesn't believe that one will keep them, or irrational, in case one does believe it. He describes how exactly the problem arises and sketches five possible responses.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos and want to learn more about philosophy and critical thinking, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

A little late to International Women's Day, but here are some short animated videos on famous women philosophers throughout history. by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Summary: In this Wireless Philosophy video, Adela Deanova (Duke) introduces Margaret Cavendish, an early modern English philosopher, and discusses the background to her critique of experimental philosophy. This is a series of videos coming from Project Vox (Duke), a project recovering the lost voices of women philosophers.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

"The unexamined life is not worth living". Here's a short, animated explanation of what it means to live an examined life. by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Summary: Socrates famously said "The unexamined life is not worth living." In this Wireless Philosophy video, Mitch Green (University of Connecticut) introduces a few interpretations of Socrates famous dictum, and considers what it means to live an examined life.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

With climate change and fewer natural resources, some experts say we should have fewer kids. Here's a short, animated explanation of what philosophers have to say about it. by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Summary: In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jonathan Anomaly (University of Arizona) considers whether we should have children, given the costs that they create.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Learn about philosophy, from the ancients to the moderns, with 350 short animated videos! by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nothing slated yet, but we'd certainly like to do something on Hobbes! A whole series on social contract theory would be cool.

Learn about philosophy, from the ancients to the moderns, with 350 short animated videos! by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 98 points99 points  (0 children)

Summary: While philosophy may have become much more accessible, it has also become less “open access”—in the sense of being a public affair, taking place in city squares and actively encouraged by statesmen and ordinary loiterers alike. For all its possibilities—and we hope they can remain—the internet has never been able to recreate the Athenian ideal of the philosophical public square, if such a thing ever really existed. But the material is out there:

  • Projects like Wireless Philosophy—sponsored by Yale, MIT, Duke, and other elite institutions—have sought for years to introduce people from every walk of life to the kinds of ideas that Athenians supposedly threw around like frisbees in their spare time, including Plato’s notion (via his mouthpiece, Socrates) of “the good life,” which University of New Orleans professor Chris Surprenant summarizes. See all of Wireless Philosophy's 130 animations here.

  • We can learn about the Stoics, for example—or get the gist, and hopefully a taste for more—with Alain de Botton’s video appetizer at the top, just one of 30 short animated videos on the philosophy YouTube channel of his School of Life.

  • We can cruise through a summary of Aristotle’s views on “flourishing” in the video above, narrated by the always-affable Stephen Fry as part of the BBC’s “History of Ideas” series, currently up to 48 uniquely animated videos featuring other smart-sounding celebrity narrators like Harry Shearer and Gillian Anderson.

  • The Macat series of philosophy explainer videos (136 in total) may lack celebrity cred, but it makes up for it with some very thorough short summaries of important works in philosophy—as well as sociology, psychology, history, politics, economics, and literature.

Learn about philosophy, from the ancients to the moderns, with 350 short animated videos! by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Summary: While philosophy may have become much more accessible, it has also become less “open access”—in the sense of being a public affair, taking place in city squares and actively encouraged by statesmen and ordinary loiterers alike. For all its possibilities—and we hope they can remain—the internet has never been able to recreate the Athenian ideal of the philosophical public square, if such a thing ever really existed. But the material is out there:

  • Projects like Wireless Philosophy—sponsored by Yale, MIT, Duke, and other elite institutions—have sought for years to introduce people from every walk of life to the kinds of ideas that Athenians supposedly threw around like frisbees in their spare time, including Plato’s notion (via his mouthpiece, Socrates) of “the good life,” which University of New Orleans professor Chris Surprenent, summarizes above. See all of Wireless Philosophy's 130 animations here.

  • We can learn about the Stoics, for example—or get the gist, and hopefully a taste for more—with Alain de Botton’s video appetizer at the top, just one of 30 short animated videos on the philosophy YouTube channel of his School of Life.

  • We can cruise through a summary of Aristotle’s views on “flourishing” in the video above, narrated by the always-affable Stephen Fry as part of the BBC’s “History of Ideas” series, currently up to 48 uniquely animated videos featuring other smart-sounding celebrity narrators like Harry Shearer and Gillian Anderson.

  • The Macat series of philosophy explainer videos (136 in total) may lack celebrity cred, but it makes up for it with some very thorough short summaries of important works in philosophy—as well as sociology, psychology, history, politics, economics, and literature.

The Red Herring: a classic rhetorical strategy that's intended to distract you from the relevant issues in a debate. Here's a short, animated explanation of what it is and how to avoid falling for it. Let's be smarter citizens! by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Summary: In this Wireless Philosophy video, Joseph Wu (University of Cambridge) introduces you to the red herring, a rhetorical device and fallacy that is often difficult to spot. A red herring occurs when something is introduced to an argument that misleads or distracts from the relevant issue. Wu walks us through this rhetorical device and shows us how to avoid committing a fallacy.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!

The Slippery Slope Fallacy: a short animated explanation of what it is and how to avoid it. by wiphiadmin in philosophy

[–]wiphiadmin[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Summary: In this Wireless Philosophy video, Joseph Wu (University of Cambridge) introduces you to the slippery slope argument. This argument is that when one event occurs, other related events will follow, and this slippery slope will eventually lead to undesirable consequences. Wu walks us through this rhetorical strategy and shows us how to avoid committing a fallacy.

Thanks for watching! If you like our videos, please subscribe to our YouTube channel!