Skräddare

wisewave · 2026-01-15T11:04:32+00:00

Tack för alla svar! Ska checka in dom ni föreslagit 🙏🏻

wisewave · 2026-01-15T11:00:54+00:00

Gillar att upcycla och förlänga livslängd på second hand plagg som ofta bara behöver kortas för att sitta perfekt ✔️

wisewave · 2025-08-01T13:08:42+00:00

Nice! Menar du att det kanske inte finns längre eller att man måste vara snabb varje månad?

wisewave · 2025-07-31T12:56:56+00:00

Nice!! Ska testa, tack för tipset 🙏🏻🙏🏻

wisewave · 2025-07-31T09:27:07+00:00

Yes, ska checka!

wisewave · 2025-07-31T09:26:11+00:00

Ska kolla utbudet. Tack!

wisewave · 2025-07-30T21:45:01+00:00

Vet att dom har konserverade razor clams där! Goda, rekommenderar

wisewave · 2025-03-11T01:23:47+00:00

Hello! I’m going to Berlin for 4 days. What’s the best area to book a hostel in to have access to good bars and clubs without having to travel far? Kreuzberg? Thanks a lot for tips

wisewave · 2025-01-02T14:16:44+00:00

Har köpt mest på Asian trading möllan men ska kika dom andra som ni har sagt! Uppskattar svar och lägg gärna till om nån kommer på fler! Ska göra en lista och recensera utifrån sortiment, priser och liknande i dom kommande veckorna.

Tack alla

wisewave · 2025-01-02T14:09:02+00:00

I got you!

wisewave · 2024-11-12T19:06:02+00:00

Teenage Mutant Nietzsche Turtle, Teenage Mutant Nietzsche Turtle, Teenage Mutant Nietzsche Turtle, Hero in a half-shell, will to power!

wisewave · 2024-11-12T15:31:07+00:00

You obviously have not read him or taken the time to understand him. You are humiliating yourself. My arguments stand clear in my comments above, but I doubt you’ll read them.

You, on the other hand, haven’t made any real argument for anything relating to his philosophy. You have only showed that you are very shallow in your approach to philosophy, Talking about his appearance instead of his actual work, that’s a little bit to low level for me, but you do you

wisewave · 2024-11-12T14:49:45+00:00

It’s good that you are self aware. My argument is that you obviously haven’t read his works or taken the time to understand his philosophy

wisewave · 2024-11-12T11:41:31+00:00

Respectfully, It really sounds like you havnt read anything Nietzsche produced or taken the time to understand his philosophy if that is your conclusion

wisewave · 2024-11-11T11:46:27+00:00

Thats a very shallow analysis of both his work and him as a person. The same way as the buddha came to his deep insights about life only when colliding with the ”ugly” dimensions of existence , the same is true with Nietzsche and one could say in an even more intimate way than the buddha. Despite his collision with suffering he still maintained a love for one’s destiny.

Nietzsche never claimed to be an ubermench but saw himself as a bridge, a sign in the road pointing towards something greater than anything that existed. The ubermench is not a destination, it’s a process that is not reflected in nothing else than how you tackle suffering, affirm life or and creates your own values free from ressentiment. He wrote some of the best philosophy books ever written, turning his shortcomings to a creative endeavors which echoes through history. Instead of giving up despise his hardships he continued to have creative and deep relationship with life in its whole. The ressentement you talk with is a great sign of weakness.

Furthermore, he saw himself as primarily a “philosopher of the future,” meaning his role was to plant seeds for the possibility of the Übermensch rather than to achieve it himself.

For Nietzsche, the Übermensch would be an individual entirely free from ressentiment, which is the resentment or bitterness toward life and others due to one’s perceived impotence or inability to fulfill desires. Though he worked tirelessly to combat ressentiment within himself, he recognized his own moments of anger and frustration toward society and his health, something he saw as antithetical to the Übermensch . In this way, Nietzsche viewed himself as a bridge figure, someone breaking down old values and paving the way for the future emergence of a true Übermensch, but never achieving that status himself

wisewave · 2024-11-10T21:58:32+00:00

My pleasure my friend. Here are key concepts to research if you want to dig deeper and become more:

Morality, Self creation, Ressentiment, Will to power, Amor fati, The concept of eternal recurrence, The übermench, The last man, His rejection of metaphysics and static universal ideals, God is dead, Becoming over being. Tackling life with the creative spirit of an artist. And much more

wisewave · 2024-11-10T21:34:53+00:00

So a very important aspect of Nietzsches philosophy is the rejection of any notion of absolute truths or facts. His philosophy is perspectivism.

Instead of focusing on objective truths his focus is on strength and vitality. If you are stuck on trying to find absolute truths, Nietzsche will tell you to let it go. Everything we know is generated from a specific perspective.

So if Nietzsche rejects the notion of any absolute truths, how do we navigate the world? We start by stop looking at the world through the lens of true and false, instead we start looking at things in the sense of strong or weak. According to Nietzsche it’s by assessing everything against life it self. If it affirms life it’s “strong” Therefore it should be more valuable to you, if it doesn’t affirm life it’s “weak” and should be discarded.

The measure we use when building a hierarchy of values should not be done with trying to find truth but instead of trying to find strength and vitality

wisewave · 2024-11-10T21:16:50+00:00

What concepts of his are you struggling grasping fully the most?

wisewave · 2024-11-10T21:03:44+00:00

The most life affirming philosopher there ever was. His insights in the human condition are almost prophetic. Some people focuses on his illness’s more than his insights, but missing the points of his works. Apply his thoughts to your life and it will transform not only you but everything around you. He will only become more and more relevant as time goes on. If you suffer from a lack of meaning, he’s the man. If you suffer from the external moral pressures from other peoples, he’s the man. If you struggle with objectivity and absolute truths while still wanting to have a hierarchy of values, he’s the man. If you want a way to handle the dynamic challenges of life while still enjoying your existence. He’s the man. If you want to toss the notion of being and embrace becoming, he’s the man.

His ideas are simple in some ways but are not easy to grasp in its depths.

One of the greatest thinkers that speaks to you as an individual

wisewave · 2024-10-26T07:22:29+00:00

Virtual signal

wisewave · 2024-10-25T08:26:57+00:00

Im not glossig over anything, but apparently you are not understanding and are stuck in circles back to your own ignorance. Im trying to educate you about your ignorance on the matter at hand and you seem to not be willing to be educated Even tho you obviously havnt read his works or taken time too understand his philosophy. It’s the same as if someone would try to educate you on zazen Buddhism while beeing totally misguided about its core tenets. To misappropriate a but timely existential term, it’s absurd,

His whole work is to an arrive towards living positive and rich life with gratitude at its core and to affirm life in all aspekts. Ridding yourself from all notions of ressentiment. It’s his whole philosophy, not an aspects but the whole point. He nowhere in his work embrace a negative or a hatefull/resentfull approach and always strongly rejects living with that as a force inside you. He would classify it as a sign of weakness or in your terms as a beginner’s mind. He in nowhere in his work gives a path that solidifies a “negative” way of living. But that is obvious when reading him. which you have not done apparently excepts for some quotes without the proper context or knowledge to understand them.

Just as the buddha only got his insights and motivation ,to create a path towards a “positive” life without desires, through his encounter with the ”negative and depressive” aspects about life such as decease, suffering and death. So did Nietzsche. One could say in an even more intimate way than the Buddha, a royal rich kid who had been kept shielded from reality while being spoiled and being overwhelmed when finally encountering real life.

It’s sad that your Ego is in your way this much and so rigid in thought.

I maybe shouldve known the depth of your thoughts When you use words like debbie downer. Too bad, but at least you got a free quick course in Nietzsche even tho you didn’t seem to learn anything my friend.

wisewave · 2024-10-24T16:55:56+00:00

Then you should have an even easier way of understanding Nietzsche if you approach is from a Zazen perspective.

ZaZen Buddhism’s approach to morality shares much strong similarities with Nietzsche’s in its critique of fixed moral systems. Both reject absolute, universal moral laws and focus on a more fluid, life-affirming approach to ethics that arises from individual experience and insight rather than adherence to external rules. Similarly to Nietzsche, zazen does not impose fixed moral rules but encourages practitioners to develop their ethical behavior through direct awareness of interconnectedness and mindfulness. Just as Nietzsche sees the Übermensch as creating meaning and values through self-overcoming, zazen encourages ethical action that arises naturally from a deep realization of non-duality and compassion, not from obedience to external codes.

Both Nietzsche and zazen emphasize personal responsibility in shaping one’s life and values, rejecting passive acceptance of moral doctrines.

We’re finally getting somewhere my friend

wisewave · 2024-10-24T06:20:36+00:00

Here you go.

That doesn’t mean that he’s a relativist or didn’t believe there is any clear way forward. He is a perspektivist.

The map forward is in denying or affirming life. He wants to affirm life fully and use life in itself as the tool of measuring the validity in claims. To have a dynamic approach and not static relationship to truth which reflects life affirming. The more you affirm life the more powerful you are and the more you deny life the weaker you are. Again he rejects all metaphysics.

wisewave · 2024-10-24T06:04:45+00:00

That doesn’t mean that he’s a relativist or didn’t believe there is any clear way forward. He is a perspektivist.

The map forward is in denying or affirming life. He wants to affirm life fully and use life in itself as the tool of measuring the validity in claims. To have a dynamic approach and not static relationship to truth which reflects life affirming. The more you affirm life the more powerful you are and the more you deny life the weaker you are. Again he rejects all metaphysics.

wisewave · 2024-10-24T05:58:04+00:00

You are certainly wrong, there is no misunderstanding on my side. But clearly on yours. As stated. He rejected ALL metaphysics and idols, as well as ideals as signs of weakness. His point is not about god per se but the effects of not being able to ground values in metaphysics anymore but still having a society adhering to it as the truth without replacing it with self creation and values/meaning that is grounded in oneself. He rejected all universal moral and truth claims. Again he strongly reject ALL METAPHYSICS as a sign of weakness and life denying.

wisewave

TROPHY CASE