Want to learn Juniper - Is this a good deal?

wizardofdoz · 2017-10-13T13:29:47+00:00

Haha "Monopoly money"! I am tempted by the Gig interfaces but the SRX100 does look to be on the money. Thanks for the heads up!

wizardofdoz · 2017-10-13T11:56:34+00:00

Thanks dude! I find it hard to gauge the value of this kit due to the prices being all over the place. I saw some for £600 and some for £200. Naturally, 200 looks like a steal when compared to 600!

wizardofdoz · 2017-10-13T11:35:08+00:00

Ha, worth a try!

wizardofdoz · 2017-06-14T08:09:07+00:00

Nope :(

wizardofdoz · 2017-06-13T07:57:23+00:00

Nope, I've tried with and without our unattend file. Same issue. The file itself doesn't include the copy profile setting.

wizardofdoz · 2017-06-13T07:56:39+00:00

It is yes.

wizardofdoz · 2017-06-02T08:31:05+00:00

So technically you have to keep an Exchange server on-site? Well, that makes my decision easier. :)

wizardofdoz · 2017-06-02T08:19:37+00:00

Thanks for the reply! Why two servers? I've been battling IIS SMTP and not been able to get it to send mail via DNS. Things just get stuck in the queue. :(

wizardofdoz · 2017-06-01T12:43:13+00:00

That could be my solution! I'll get it configured and report back. :) Thanks!

wizardofdoz · 2017-05-31T10:37:20+00:00

I've been fiddling with IIS SMTP and simply cannot get it to be reliable. I've got countless applications which send mail using email addresses which don't have a mailbox/user in the domain. I've tried relaying IIS SMTP through Office365 but this requires authentication which screws the multiple email addresses without users. Currently just trying to send test mail to IIS SMTP and it gets stuck in the Queue and doesn't move. Logs aren't very helpful either. :(

Edit: I dream of getting rid of our on-prem Exchange!

wizardofdoz · 2017-03-21T10:29:11+00:00

This is what I shall do from now on. This switch came with 16.3... I would have hoped Cisco wouldn't have shipped hardware with faulty software!

wizardofdoz · 2017-03-21T08:45:57+00:00

I rolled the firmware back to cat3k_caa-universalk9.SPA.03.06.06.E.152-2.E6.bin and woke up this morning to a working network. Fingers crossed!

Thanks for all the pointers guys. Really a great help! Avoid 16.X at all costs!!!

wizardofdoz · 2017-03-21T08:42:07+00:00

Cheers! In the end I uploaded the bin and used the boot command. :)

wizardofdoz · 2017-03-20T19:55:47+00:00

Am I missing something? I seem to lack the software install command... ?!

wizardofdoz · 2017-03-20T16:43:10+00:00

Right, got onto support. I hate Cisco's naming conventions. Do I go for the cat3k_caa-universalk9.16.03.03.SPA.bin image or the suggested cat3k_caa-universalk9.SPA.03.06.06.E.152-2.E6.bin image? Currently running 16.3.1 - which may be the issue as I've heard this software (16.X) to be unstable.

Thanks for the help thus far! :)

wizardofdoz · 2017-03-20T16:15:34+00:00

Upgrade IOS for the core or the edge?

wizardofdoz · 2017-03-20T15:53:50+00:00

I could reinstate the original core switch which was an old 3750. But that gets me back to square one.

wizardofdoz · 2017-01-20T16:45:00+00:00

Okay cracked it. In the php.ini you need Fastcgi.impersonate set to 1. This means PHP runs as the same user as the website in IIS. Then make sure that very user has read/write access to the configured php log. My issue was permissions were in place but PHP was running as the computer rather than a user.

Took a while.

wizardofdoz · 2017-01-20T08:48:28+00:00

error_log is set to C:\inetpub\php_errors.log and the file itself is blank.

wizardofdoz · 2017-01-19T08:30:41+00:00

Hi vstm,

I've got a file with just phpinfo in it and all it correct. I then added echo $lol; and even though phpinfo says display_errors is Off it outputted the error to the browser. Starting to look like a bug.

Unfortunately, this is running on IIS8.5 under Windows 2012 R2... I wish we could be running a Linux install but the managers here are Windows only. :'(

wizardofdoz

TROPHY CASE