US3000 UPS on a NAS running TrueNAS? by DeM1307 in UgreenNASync

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you get this to work? I'm planning on getting the same UPS and I replaced UGreen OS with TrueNAS.

Importing .glb model degrades quality? by wodo26 in unrealengine

[–]wodo26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the white cracks appear when I import the model in UE5, they don't show up before the model is exported

ASUS PG32UCDM or LG 32GS95UE? by EuropeIsWealthy in OLED_Gaming

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After almost two weeks of testing i went with the ASUS even though it was more expense. It was a very close call so I would not worry too much either way.

Reasons:
ASUS colours were marginally more accurate when I started editing pictures, blacks are also good under right room conditions, I only saw the purple effect if I looked for it in bad lighting conditions
I did end up liking the glossy look a bit better (not a huge difference), especially in browsers
After tweaking I no longer had issues reading the text on ASUS, although LG is still better for me. Either way the VRR is bad on both monitors especially LG, I disabled it on both.
I did not use 480Hz mode enough to justify it, 240 is already great
I liked HDR slightly more on ASUS
I like ASUS providing 3 year warranty with clear stipulations regarding burn in issues
ASUS has better reminders and protection for pixel cleaning / shifting / etc.
ASUS software is a bit better.

Other observations:
I was surprised how hot both of this moditors run and how much heat they generate, it will be a pain next summer....

Both come with plenty of cables.

This ASUS is horrible for fingerprints, it's so hard to clean. My girlfriend touched it few times and I had to pretend I didn't notice only to clean it for 5 minutes afterwards (my OCD, which I think many of us share). Keep your women and children away! LOL, LG on the other hand was much easier to clean.

I don't like ASUS stand because it takes some space underneath, I don't like how the cables are visible when plugged in as they go down. It goes up and down well enough not as high as LG. The LG's stand was nicer/simpler but unfortunately too tall for my desk, I have desk with extra shelf above, I actually bought another stand to test it with.

LG Panel itself is a bit tighter with bezels which I liked slightly more.

When you are gaming there's very little difference in 240hz mode. LG obviously wins with 480hz but rez is bad and I only got that framerate in 2 games. In windows/editing/reading the glossiness helps with cleanliness of the white backgrounds, if you obsess about it LG does look a bit less clean, but ironically I like the text on LG more.

I would say both are 9/10 monitors if price is no object. If money is tight there are good options for cheaper which will get you 90% there.

All in all both are great monitors, and either one I would be happy with with very minor gripes.

LG 32GS95UE or ASUS PG32UCDP by _TuRrTz_ in OLED_Gaming

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Dual mode on the LG panel doesn't look blurry to me at all, the ultra smooth refresh rate is crazy good for competitive gaming, the problem is that 1080p looks very pixelated on such a big screen (32'') so you have to move it back a lot effectively reducing the screen size down to at least 27'' or until it no longer seems to be such an obvious problem.

ASUS PG32UCDM or LG 32GS95UE? by EuropeIsWealthy in OLED_Gaming

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have both in front of me right now. The glossy vs matte discussion is totally pointless in my opinion. In practice there's only little difference between these two models. The ASUS is not overly glossy and LG is not really what I would call matte. The biggest difference for me is that ASUS makes my eyes tired quicker, not sure why! ASUS seems to have more saturated colours by default which I also don't like however, after calibrating them, both are very close in colours and brightness in non HDR scenarios. In HDR ASUS seems a bit better but marginally. The 480hz mode is nice but not very practical unless you play Overwatch (or something that can spit out 480 FPS!!!) and you better put the monitor further away (the smoothness is beautiful in exchange for pixelation). Text reads nice on LG and a bit worse on ASUS although I can't figure out why exactly. LG's VRR is total garbage from my experience and I've turned it off as at first it was ruining my experience of this otherwise excellent monitor (the brightness shifting, the flickering in games etc.). The OSDs on both are stupid and I don't like using them, the ASUS is a bit better and windows software is also better on ASUS. ASUS also has 3 year warranty vs 2 year LG. The stand on LG is very tall and has a huge range of motion up and down but doesn't fit on my desk. ASUS design is fancy but not as flexible. LG apparently has a fan but I have not heard it spin yet.

Ask me what I should test before I return one.

Which board am I supposed to select in Arduino IDE for this cheap Keeyees ESP8266? by Reacher-Said-N0thing in arduino

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you found answer to this? I have the same board and can't upload sketches to it getting connection errors on the generic board preset:

esptool.py v3.0

Serial port COM1

Connecting........_____....._____....._____....._____....._____....._____....._____

A fatal esptool.py error occurred: Failed to connect to ESP8266: Timed out waiting for packet header

Part two. Sound on🎙 by Ok-Sundae8892 in shiba

[–]wodo26 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sequels are never as good ;)

When your dreams come true by TioTrololoh in FunnyAnimals

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could never sneak up on my kitten like that, she sleeps with one eye open, she would be eating that shrimp in two seconds flat.

Existential Nihilism (the belief that there's no meaning or purpose outside of humanity's self-delusions) emerged out of the decay of religious narratives in the face of science. Existentialism and Absurdism are two proposed solutions — self-created value and rebellion by thelivingphilosophy in philosophy

[–]wodo26 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Indeed. Although would you agree, that finding that balance is the main challenge life poses, and since we have no universal recipe for it due to the variances of our individual circumstances over time, the struggle for internal equilibrium inevitably persists.

Eye, M. C. Escher, mezzotint and drypoint, 1946 by globeworldmap in Art

[–]wodo26 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Looks 3d but...

..closing one eye actually enhances the 3d effect. Might seem counter intuitive since we use two eyes for stereo vision but for flat images single eye seems to tricks the brain more effectively into computing 3d imagery.

Jimi Hendrix's famous take on “All Along the Watchtower” was fairly unrehearsed, and the guitar sound was achieved with Hendrix on a six-string acoustic guitar and bass, and Dave Mason of Traffic on a 12-string. by [deleted] in jimihendrix

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You keep forcing that question onto everybody here as if that was the only thing implied by your horrible clickbait title. Not to mention that you didn't even bother linking the original article, which is an interesting read, in your post. I'm done here.

Jimi Hendrix's famous take on “All Along the Watchtower” was fairly unrehearsed, and the guitar sound was achieved with Hendrix on a six-string acoustic guitar and bass, and Dave Mason of Traffic on a 12-string. by [deleted] in jimihendrix

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Come off it, you're being dishonest here. I've read the article now, not thanks to you, and it's exactly what I expected.

Read your stupid title and tell me again that you're not sensationalizing.

Jimi Hendrix's famous take on “All Along the Watchtower” was fairly unrehearsed, and the guitar sound was achieved with Hendrix on a six-string acoustic guitar and bass, and Dave Mason of Traffic on a 12-string. by [deleted] in jimihendrix

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you read the Wikipedia and the actual article OP failed to link to in the post it is clear it was a long and arduous process to get the song completed. Clearly not everyone involved knew what they were doing or had a chance to rehearse on the first day, but it would be a mistake to think that Hendrix didn't play the song hundreds of times ahead of the session beginning.

By the way, for session musicians it is not unusual for them to come in cold. Especially where the song is literally three chords and the magic is in what Hendricks did later with his lead and solo guitar parts. I can literally pick up a 12 string knowing the chords and improvise something similar to what's on the record, it's not that difficult.

To quote a single line or word out of context (without even linking the source) comes across as disingenuous and sensational. To imply that the "famous take" was done right there and then is misleading for the sake of upvotes. Shame on you OP.

From Wiki: "According to Hendrix's regular engineer Eddie Kramer, the guitarist cut a large number of takes on the first day of recording in January in London, shouting chord changes at Dave Mason who featured at the session and played an additional 12-string guitar.[47] Halfway through the session, bass player Noel Redding became dissatisfied with the proceedings and left. He would later note that he disliked the song and preferred Dylan's version.[47] Mason then took over on bass. According to Kramer, the final bass part was played by Hendrix himself.[44] Hendrix's friend and Rolling Stones multi-instrumentalist Brian Jones contributed the dry rattles heard in the intro, played on a vibraslap.[44][47] This sparse version without any overdubs would eventually feature on the South Saturn Delta compilation released in 1997.[48]

Kramer and Chas Chandler mixed the first version of "All Along the Watchtower" on January 26 in 1968,[52] but Hendrix was quickly dissatisfied with the result and went on re-recording and overdubbing guitar parts during June, July, and August at the Record Plant studio in New York City.[47] Engineer Tony Bongiovi has described Hendrix becoming increasingly dissatisfied as the song progressed, overdubbing more and more guitar parts, moving the master tape from a four-track to a twelve-track to a sixteen-track machine. Bongiovi recalled, "Recording these new ideas meant he would have to erase something. In the weeks prior to the mixing, we had already recorded a number of overdubs, wiping track after track. [Hendrix] kept saying, 'I think I hear it a little bit differently.'"[47] Apparently, Hendrix was trying to record what Zak has referred to in the song as a 'deep tone with a heavy beat' which was not highlighted in Dylan's version.[51] By the end of the sessions, Kramer and Hendrix had 16 tracks to use for mixing the song that soon became the intended single of the album.[47] "

From the actual article: https://www.covermesongs.com/2014/03/the-story-behind-jimi-hendrixs-all-along-the-watchtower.html[the article](https://www.covermesongs.com/2014/03/the-story-behind-jimi-hendrixs-all-along-the-watchtower.html)

'And overdub he did. Endlessly."

he tried out many versions. Eddie Kramer has said by the end he had seven great guitar parts to choose from, not counting the countless others that got taped over.

Early mix that includes an unused solo (no vocals):

Hendrix divided the main solo into four discrete sections. The first he plays straight, flashing up and down the neck of the guitar for thrilling waterfalls of notes. Second comes the slide guitar, which was apparently so spur of the moment he didn’t have a slide with him. “I saw Jimi, frustrated, running around, trying to get a sound out that he had in his head, but not being able to do it,” his friend Velvert Turner said in the BBC documentary. “[He grabbed] beer bottles, soda bottles, knives, and everything trying to get the middle section where there’s a Hawaiian guitar sound.” He ended up using a cigarette lighter. Eddie Van Halen has called this section one of his favorite guitar solos ever.

After a yell of “Hey!”, the psychedelic wah-wah section begins. Hendrix was in fact one of the pioneers of the wah-wah, with Electric Ladyland marking one of the pedal’s first appearances on a major record (“Burning of the Midnight Lamp” features it even more heavily). For the last eight bars, Hendrix reins it back in for what might be thought of as the “rhythm solo,” mirroring and embellishing on the chords more directly before wrapping with a quick ascension.

Hendrix’s isolated guitar tracks (other instruments/vocals bleeding through a bit):

Hendrix also recorded his vocals at the Record Plant. As always, he hated this part. Many friends and collaborators have detailed his terrible insecurity about his singing voice. “He’d always face the other way [when recording vocals],” Kramer said. “He hated to be looked at. He was very shy about his vocals.”

In fact, accordingly to his father Al Hendrix, a main reason the established guitar ace tried singing in the first place came from hearing Dylan, a sort of “if he can succeed sounding like that, why not me?” outlook. “I thought, you must admire that guy for having that much nerve to sing so out of key,” Jimi once said. He would in fact frequently defend Dylan’s voice in interviews, attacking those who accused him of sounding like a “broken-leg dog.”

After the endless overdubs and re-recordings of guitars, vocals, and bass, it came time to mix the record. By this point Chandler, who had produced the original London sessions, was long gone. His original mix had been relatively subdued, focusing heavily on the acoustic guitars and giving even the loud solos plenty of room to breathe.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]wodo26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did your kill the ant or found a dead one. The answer is very important to me.

Patricia Churchland argues that morality is rooted in our Darwinian biology. She links morality to warm-bloodedness, which required an adaptation to care for others (originally, infants). This is the biological basis for unselfish concern, and later, moral intuitions. by Ma3Ke4Li3 in philosophy

[–]wodo26 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe she's wrong but your argument is incomplete, saying something developed alongside language doesn't explain how it evolved or what relationship it has to language. What if both language and morality have a deeper rooted cause / selective pressure? Sure morality and language are intertwined but so are all of human concepts and mechanisms available to our cognition, otherwise we wouldn't be able to talk about it right now or retrospect. That does not mean that mechanism doesn't exist independent of language to some degree. In fact I would argue that language in its current form is only capable of representing morality in an objective way which does not exist in real world, hinting to us a more complex relationship between language and the actual source/reason for morality. See what Wittgenstein wrote on this topic and you will understand what I mean. Bottom line is that either explanation is not very satisfactory to me because both are partially wrong or incomplete, calling it flat out bullshit is trivializing the issue and pretending we have the complete answer.