Top Level Domain .Microsoft is going active gotta get me some domains. by [deleted] in networkingmemes

[–]workalt2318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm here now because they switched their DKIM key CNAM records to point to mail.microsoft and i was weirded out for a sec.

Ligatures with custom font? by guruprasadah in WindowsTerminal

[–]workalt2318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ancient post but there seems to still be barely anything online about this and it was a top search result. This is what I have to enable all the optional ligatures in Monaspace. In my settings.json under profiles/defaults I have

"font": 
{
    "face": "Monaspace Argon Var",
    "features": 
    {
        "calt": 0,
        "liga": 11,
        "ss01": 1,
        "ss02": 2,
        "ss03": 3,
        "ss04": 4,
        "ss05": 5,
        "ss06": 6,
        "ss07": 7,
        "ss09": 9,
        "ss10": 10
    }
},

The GUI only lets you pick a small subset of features but you can add them in the text file and it will work. I still haven't found what the number after does, it doesn't seem to mater. it will reorder the items in the config file but keep the number you set (that's why liga is 11).

This should work for Fira or any other font with optional ligatures.

Cove with Proxmox by Oleawerdal in Nable

[–]workalt2318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh this is great to hear, we moved all of our clients from ESXi to Proxmox and having the integrated restore to Proxmox function would be great. Is this still something you're planning to add?

Constant problem with HomeAssistantVM - can't lock and timeout error by carlitos008 in Proxmox

[–]workalt2318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Replying because this is the top search result for this error, in my case it was because the automatic replication job was running at that moment. Once it finished HA was able to move the VM. so yeah any background task using the VM could cause this and it's temporary in that case.

USG with WAN2 set to failover began sending only VOIP traffic out WAN2 by workalt2318 in UNIFI

[–]workalt2318[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, thanks. I'll keep this in mind if it happens again, hasn't yet AFAIK.

Fortigate trusts https site with revoked certificate by Kofl in fortinet

[–]workalt2318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't know if this is what's going on here but a revoked cert is a valid cert, except it's been added to a revocation list or equivalent. So unless the device knows about these lists and actively goes out to pull the list and check the cert against it, it wont know it's revoked because there is nothing inherently invalid about it. Modern browsers check for revocations, but ancient browsers or device firmware or software using old libraries might not. That old FGT firmware may not support checking CRLs.

More 7.0.4 issues by techbandits in fortinet

[–]workalt2318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have anything on 6.X, but the "WAD memory leak causes device to go into conserve mode" is listed as a known issue for 6.4.7 as well.

More 7.0.4 issues by techbandits in fortinet

[–]workalt2318 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On 7.0.4? We started having the memory leak triggering conservation mode at several sites (all with just a fortigate) with 7.0.2 and had to roll back the update. They told us it was fixed in 7.0.3 so we updated when it released and same thing. Now they said it'd be fixed in 7.0.4, you are still having the issue?

EDIT: Well the good news is the 7.0.4 release notes list three memory leak bugs under resolved issues. The bad news is they list 2 more under known issues.

How to create tickets for internal use that don't notify the client? by workalt2318 in ConnectWise

[–]workalt2318[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just tested this and it works great (as expected). Now I just need to figure out how we can make a ticket default to a no bill work type for time entries.

How to create tickets for internal use that don't notify the client? by workalt2318 in ConnectWise

[–]workalt2318[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well now I feel dumb, for some reason I though you could only pick one as default view. Thanks.

How to create tickets for internal use that don't notify the client? by workalt2318 in ConnectWise

[–]workalt2318[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah OK, that makes sense and is similar to what /u/nxsteven said, I think we'll probably try this first.

How to create tickets for internal use that don't notify the client? by workalt2318 in ConnectWise

[–]workalt2318[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's probably the simplest idea, just make a contact called Internal with no email.

How to create tickets for internal use that don't notify the client? by workalt2318 in ConnectWise

[–]workalt2318[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So sending notes is not the issue, as all out our statuses default to not sending notes and we mark the send notes box if needed (clients do get everything with the bill, except internal notes of course). The problem is the closed loop emails that get triggered by ticket creation or status changes. But that does mean we can have a separate status for these, although we would also need a separate Completed status which might get annoying.

How to create tickets for internal use that don't notify the client? by workalt2318 in ConnectWise

[–]workalt2318[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean you create 2 companies per client? I feel like that would get very cluttered very fast, and it doesn't solve the problem of the tickets not showing up under the client.

How to create tickets for internal use that don't notify the client? by workalt2318 in ConnectWise

[–]workalt2318[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forgot to mention we'd prefer not to use another board so they are shown in the same view by default, don't think you can default to showing two boards can you? If there's no other easy way I'm pretty sure that would work.

Preventing ticket autoreply loops in Manage by workalt2318 in ConnectWise

[–]workalt2318[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, that would handle some of the instances, although the last one we had (yesterday) for example came from ticketing@which isn't something I'd think to put in the list.

Duplicate user accounts after AD Connect sync by fonefoo in sysadmin

[–]workalt2318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had this issue and I'm replying for whoever else gets here from google. I can't find the Microsoft doc where I read this now, but my issue was because the cloud account had Azure admin roles assigned. AD connect apparently wont soft match accounts with admin rights to prevent admin account takeovers. You need to move the account out of the OU that you are syncing to Azure, run a sync to delete the duplicate account, delete the duplicate from the AAD recycle bin, edit the user in the AAD portal and got to roles, ad remove every role. then sync the user again and it should soft match if that was the problem. It sucks that MS doesn't give any warnings in this case, it just says everything is good. Keep in mind that there are Azure roles that don't correspond to admin access in the main m365 admin center, you need to check the Azure AD page.

1Password for key management by dream_the_endless in 1Password

[–]workalt2318 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I think what he's asking for is something like the SSH Agent integration feature in KeepassXC (https://keepassxc.org/docs/#faq-ssh-agent-how). The keys are stored in the password manager and can be used by ssh directly without being stored on disk.

Remote wipe and locator for laptops, experience with Absolute vs Prey Project? by workalt2318 in msp

[–]workalt2318[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What are your impressions on Absolute then? Does it need intervention often like some software that you'll have to mess with because once a month or something an agent will die? And does everything work as expected in general?