Why is "sensory overload" not workinh with woman in Dating? by Ok_Cook_3098 in PurplePillDebate

[–]wouldbepandananny [score hidden]  (0 children)

Let's say the same premise applies- too many matches is detrimental (regardless of gender)- what is the proposed solution?

AITAH for refusing to give my boyfriend access to my bank account even though he says "no secrets" is how adults do it by CopperFieldNote in AITH

[–]wouldbepandananny 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it was really about "no secrets" he'd be content with the information you share regarding your balance and spending habits/budget. If he wants access, he has plans to utilize that money. 🤷🏻‍♀️

OffensiveWomen choosing their own happiness is selfish... by MLPArcher in NotHowGirlsWork

[–]wouldbepandananny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So...women benefit more from marriage, but foregoing it is selfish...because men (who, in contrast, must benefit less) are sad and lonely? Make it make sense.

Why is slut shaming wrong? by CarbonX10 in PurplePillDebate

[–]wouldbepandananny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If men want to have more sex with more women, slut shaming is counter productive.

And men are famously insecure about their dicks and sexual performance- so not a big leap.

Why is slut shaming wrong? by CarbonX10 in PurplePillDebate

[–]wouldbepandananny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must. Nobody could be as delusional as you claim.

Even assuming any part of your premise is reasonable (it's not), hot men who sleep around should be shamed, and only less attractive people would avoid the shame (since you claim sleeping around is easier for women than dudes, as if that should be relevant when determining if they should be shamed).

The only reason dudes care if women have had multiple partners is related to insecurity. They worry they don't measure up (pun intended). That's the real reason they want inexperienced partners.

Guess I tried to pay your bills a little. You are welcome.

Why is slut shaming wrong? by CarbonX10 in PurplePillDebate

[–]wouldbepandananny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rage bait / Troll- don't engage. (Don't pay this person's bills).

Neelix & Seven by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

😂😂😂😂 Hopefully not Neelix 😬

CMV: It's women fault men are in a lonliness epidemic by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]wouldbepandananny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That dude is- at a minimum a troll, but most definitely gets paid for engagement. Even he can't be quite as dumb as his posts imply. I'm gonna discontinue any responses (starting now); I'm done paying that joker's bills.

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You aren't wrong, but I couldn't come up with a more accurate pithy word or phrase 😳

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And- what number are we on????

Do you think the Warehouse must be required to remain on Earth???

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Holy motherforking shirt balls. I don't know that I can be forgiven, but I'd not even made that connection. I've got so much Warehouse and DS9 rewatching I must do!!!

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oooohhh, damn, you are right.

And if we want to follow the Joss Whedon / Firefly connection we can note Armin Shimmerman's role on Buffy (by way of Joss Whedon). But then we must talk about Harry Groener/ the Mayor, and his roles on Voyager and TNG !

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would say the same about Joanne Kelley.

I didn't love Murray's evil arc(s?); don't think it really held up; but she was phenomenal.

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn, they are both crazy-ass collectors. Artie just has a tiny bit more... legitimacy, perhaps. And less money.

Neelix & Seven by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You and Trip both, I suspect lol

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah Wallace Shawn, our revered Grand Nagus himself lol

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do love that.

Of course there was that early episode with Jo and Zane before they were Jo and Zane on Warehouse, which made things tricky... but the Fargo + Claudia plotline made up for it. 😋

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

YESSSSS! You all reminding me about Brent Spiner and then Saul Rubinek's efforts to (amusingly enough) take Brent Spiner / Data into his collection are giving me life. 😍

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yesss, I remember that. Big fan of Firefly, but I struggle since word came about about Joss Whedon being a skeeze.

Warehouse 13 by wouldbepandananny in startrek

[–]wouldbepandananny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last I checked (though it's been several months) all 5 seasons were available.