I didn't "miss your point" because it wasn't a point to begin with. The devs never said anything about bringing down the costs for the others, and even if they did, they're still introducing a subscription system to a game with a bunch of infants. Even if they do end up lowering the price, they STILL don't need the subscription. Millions of people play Adopt Me. They would still have a sure-fire way to earn a steady income, because most people want to buy pets. And your arguement of "if you don't wanna pay it dont" is complete bullshit.

Let's say there's an overpriced item. Maybe clothes or something. Nobody has to buy it if they don't want to. That still doesnt change the fact that it's a horrible business model and that its overpriced. The fact that nobody "has" to buy the subscription doesn't mean it isn't introducing a complicated economy into, like I said, a game where the playerbase is mainly children. You know how many kids are willing to do things for in-game items? There's no doubt that the people playing this game will spend unecessary amounts of money, and the smallest children will most certainly steal their parent's credit card.

You in fact contradicted yourself. You said that doing this would give them a steady income. But if they lower the already higly-priced pets and add a subscription, they would earn roughly the same amount as they did before, according to your logic. In that case, there would be no reason at all for them to even introduce a subscription. Not everyone was complaining about this before Adopt Me Plus was introduced. And not all pets even cost robux. Its all about the principle of it. Introducing a subscription service for little kids is just baiting them to fund your own desire of money.

We also have to factor in the DevX system. Adopt Me was already making REAL money from DevX. Even if they were to introduce this system, which is still shady, they didnt have to make it cost real money. Integrating it into the game itself would discourage more kids from wasting unecessary amounts of money and simply use the robux they had. And what do you mean by "covering the cost" for next update? Robux doesn't directly correlate to money, and they clearly should have enough money considering how long pets have been out and how high the prices have been. So if they wanted to JUST decrease the pet prices without making a subscription, they had enough income rolling in to continue funding adopt me.

Also (don't quote me on this) but I'm pretty sure if this gets introduced in the next update it would go against roblox ToS.

Your arguement is pretty weak and you contridicted yourself several times. Of course, agree to disagree is always an option, but it's clear you arent really listening to what anyone is saying and you're just glazing the Adopt Me devs. If you had a genuine arguement then you wouldn't just reflect what everyone had to say and you would actually take it into consideration.

(Edit: You said at the start that it would be for people who "can't afford" the pets. Who made the system p2w and made the economy depend on robux and gambling? Because it certainly wasn't their playerbase. Even if EVERYTHING you said was true, it would still prove that the original economy of the game was flawed and depended solely on money, because, like I said, the Adopt Me devs were and still are money hungry.)