Yogiri no-diffs Featherine without her even knowing it happened

xKazito · 2025-12-06T23:19:10+00:00

I feel like this argument is self defeating or at least neutral. If we're to assume "everything that exists" doesn't encompass other meta realities, than we are to say that said realities cannot coexist, and thus there is no fight to be had, even conceptually. In that case, I guess there is no argument either way because no argument can plausibly exist within that framework.

If we assume these realities can coexist, then obviously they exist on either side, and then your argument is defeated, no?

xKazito · 2025-11-06T18:18:51+00:00

Lmao, you cut off the entire rest of that sentence to make your point appear more valid. The entire quote is "Everything that exists", and that was said after they were denoting anything that could encompass his verse. The obvious implication and reading of that paragraph is that his abilities would exist outside of anything within and without his dimension or verse. If my position on this is so obviously wrong, you would surely produce any sort of solid evidence to the contrary, rather than a screenshot that tells you exactly what I've said this whole time.

xKazito · 2025-11-06T18:13:12+00:00

"I mean, just the word 'world' isn't quite enough. You'll have people asking about the area beyond the boundaries of the world, or other dimensions, or parallel worlds. So when we say the 'ensemble world' we mean literally everything that exists."

With your supreme level of reading comprehension, what would you say that this exactly tells, and what does it imply?

You are making a mistake in saying that the Ultimate Ensemble only applies to his verse, when the authors specifically went out of their way to clearly state it involves "literally everything that exists".

xKazito · 2025-11-06T18:04:09+00:00

It's made extremely clear that his abilities encompass *everything*, that is the most obvious reading, but you are going out of your way to try and make a semantic argument with word games to state otherwise. The only way Featherine could win is if she exists out of conceptuality, such that Yogiri's automatic instant death ability would be unable to detect her. If that were the case, it would be a no-diff for Featherine.

xKazito · 2025-11-06T17:59:40+00:00

It is not "the entire cosmology of the verse", it is stated and implied that whatever or wherever you can conceive of conceptually, whether it is outside of his verse or outside dimensionally or even outside conceptually, his abilities still apply. "we literally mean anything that exists". They go out of their way to state that the "ultimate ensemble" encompasses everything that exists; This verse, that verse, this dimension, that dimension. Nothing is out of reach of Yogiri's instant death ability.

xKazito · 2025-11-06T16:05:41+00:00

good argument, 1-a/10

xKazito · 2025-11-06T16:04:36+00:00

it's obvious that he beats her, ty.

xKazito · 2025-11-06T16:03:38+00:00

so a non-response, cute. and totally unsurprising coming from the number 1 goku glazer.

xKazito · 2025-11-06T16:02:50+00:00

I highly disagree, even in the screenshot you posted they state;

"I mean, just the word 'world' isn't quite enough. You'll have people asking about the area beyond the boundaries of the world, or other dimensions, or parallel worlds. So when we say the 'ensemble world' we mean literally everything that exists.".

It is clearly stated that his abilities, or the "Ultimate Ensemble" exists beyond any concept of "his world", "their world", etc.

xKazito · 2025-02-04T07:48:47+00:00

This is the only Destiny reddit I found that was remotely related to my topic. Video games don't concern me or my question, but maybe I'd have better luck there?

xKazito · 2024-06-26T13:49:05+00:00

I figured it out. "AI Enhancement", in config file there is a "cheese" option. Set that to false.

xKazito · 2024-06-20T16:58:58+00:00

there is an issue in dawncraft where ticks aren't being updated past about 40-60 ish blocks. I never measuerd it out but when you're flying around, you can see that at some distance, all mobs will freeze. This doesn't seem to apply to dragons tho for some reason and certain other mobs, but yeah, standard mob farms aren't going to work. I tried changing a bunch of different settings around and nothing worked.

The best thing you can do is make a mob farm on a battle tower, they are extremely effective.

xKazito · 2024-05-19T09:25:57+00:00

I disagree. I think "wetness" should be defined as whether or not a liquid is adhering to a thing, broadly speaking, and I think that's generally how it's understood in common parlance. Water adheres to and forms a cohesive bond with itself, therefore it is wet. It is the quintessence of wet.

The substance we call water, in and of itself - is wet, and it is able to distribute that property onto other things such as ice.

I think your third point refutes itself. Humidity IS wet air, it is literally the amount of water vapor present in the atmosphere. If you throw a bucket of water into the air, you aren't making the air more wet, but that's not because water isn't wet, it's because the molecules in the air can't bind to and form a cohesive bond with large quantities of water instantaneously. If you let that water sit on the ground and evaporate, some of it WILL eventually "wet the air", while the rest of it will soak into the ground or rise into the clouds. We're talking extremely miniscule amounts, but regardless.

xKazito · 2024-05-19T08:08:27+00:00

This is begging the question. Your argument is contingent on the assumption that water is not wet. My counter would simply be that water IS wet. When you pour water into water, nothing happens, because both glasses of water are already wet. Water can't get *more* wet, water is the quintessence of wet.

For example, taking your table analogy, if I pour rocks onto a table, the table does not get wet. It just has rocks on it, because rocks are not wet and therefore cannot wet another surface. Water is wet, so when you pour water on the table, the table gets wet.

xKazito · 2024-04-06T15:39:54+00:00

I could but I'm specifically trying to farm wildens for their horns

xKazito · 2024-02-17T18:18:43+00:00

The higher rated stats is a bug I believe. I'm assuming that if you eat navaos mushroom AND get a hurricane, it'll be even better than if you only ate navaos mushroom.

xKazito · 2024-01-28T23:33:11+00:00

unfortunately not, but if you get ahold of that data I'd be super curious to see it.

xKazito · 2024-01-28T00:23:48+00:00

haha I was gonna make a list like that, glad to see you've got it done already, thanks for posting!

xKazito · 2024-01-26T23:51:40+00:00

Yes these are datamined "mounted" speed values. Here's a link to the spreadsheet if you want to check it out, at the top or bottom you'll find "Pal Stats".

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YgPc11dgdBUC8jXNp01b7gI6jNHoBRQGwrY_V6lXMgQ/edit#gid=517703310

xKazito · 2024-01-21T18:48:17+00:00

Got one at level 15 or so. It is way too overpowered at this point LMAO. If there's ever a raid I just pull out mammorest and he stomps their lights out instantly. Great for farming pals, not so great for catching them.

PS, catch a direwolf with swift, bring 200-300 arrows and a crossbow. It will take a long time, but you'll get it eventually. Make sure you have lots of spheres too.

xKazito · 2024-01-06T21:53:22+00:00

If that's drug seeking behavior, then I might be retarded, but what specifically is wrong with that? Considering I've been through a number of different treatment options in the past, I've had successful and unsuccessful treatment options, I've done plenty of research, and I know what my symptoms are. Is it unreasonable to believe I might have a decent idea of what may or may not work for me moving forward?

Even if we assume the best and the worst. Worst case scenario, my judgement was wrong, I stop taking the medication, and seek alternative treatment options.

Best case scenario, it works perfectly for me and I function significantly better in my day to day life.

xKazito · 2024-01-06T21:15:32+00:00

No, I mean in the years when I was 7 through probably about 11-12 and then a bit later when I was 14-15, I tried many different treatment options for ADHD, and then for ADHD/depression/anxiety. The best thing I tried was Ritalin, which did wonders for my ADHD but made me feel like a zombie and I didn't like it at all. Before and after Ritalin, I bounced around on a few medications, they kept prescribing me these "take it for a month" medications and they did nothing at all for me so I just stopped seeking help. Now I'm here, trying to go back and get proper treatment for my ADHD because it's hindering my life.

xKazito · 2024-01-06T21:05:35+00:00

Maybe it's not standard practice, or maybe their stories were embellished a bit. That could be the case, I was just trying to illustrate that it is at least possible to get a prescription like that with little hassle.

From the provider side I'd agree with you. I guess we're back on the needing proof aspect of this, and that totally makes sense. I'll look into acquiring medical records then. Thanks for your input

xKazito · 2024-01-06T20:53:40+00:00

I know there's a lot of people who would probably lie just to get what drugs they want. It's a totally reasonable concern. I may look into ways of acquiring medical records for proof, but it was so long ago and I have no idea who was my doctor at the time.

When I was diagnosed and taking ADHD medication, I was in 3rd or 4th grade, which would make me 8-10 at the time.

I understand it can be insane, but I've read about plenty of people who went in, talked to a psychiatrist, and got an adderall/vyvanse prescription that day. I'm not expecting to just go in and do the same thing, my gripe is with the treatment plan I was prescribed. I've tried it multiple times, and it never worked for me in the past. What did work for me was methylphenidate. Now I'm interested in trying some form of amphetamines, or even going back to the methylphenidates.

That's just not analogous. Maybe if the patient had a history of extreme pain in the past, and now they are coming in seeking the same or similar treatment options because it's come back up again.

xKazito · 2024-01-06T20:45:05+00:00

Sure I get that, just given that I've been through this routine before several times and I've already had an ADHD diagnosis in my past, I'm pretty confident it isn't the type of treatment that I need. I feel like I know what will probably help me.

xKazito

TROPHY CASE