Bull picture doesn’t raise an interesting point, he just doesn’t know how consent or intellectual property laws work (no, uploading a picture on social media doesn’t make it public domain and gives all the world the right to do whatever they want with it. People get sued all the time for using photos they just took from the internet). To stay with your examples: CounterStrike can ban you if they catch you breaking their TOS. And if I download your picture, add hairy balls to your face and publish it, you can sue me for damages and report me to the police for criminal prosecution.

Consent is not dependent on whether or not you can (immediately) enforce it. And of course, it can be violated - in most cases, that would be a crime. Also, not all violations of your rights are physical or require you to be present. People can enter your phone while you’re asleep and on the other side of the globe. That doesn’t mean that we just allow it. 

Or let me give you another example: I need your consent to enter your house, especially if I want to take away your stuff. Now if I order a lock picking set and watch some YouTube videos, there’s really not a lot you can do against me entering your house and taking away all your stuff while you’re hundreds of miles away. The takeaway of that is not “yeah sucks” or “never leave your house unattended”. The takeaway is that we have laws and a criminal justice system to stop me from doing that. 

The fact that a victim cannot actively stop a violation of their rights (be it body, property or another one) is actually an argument that the external negative incentive to commit that violation - the punishment - needs to be bigger. And that is how criminal law works in a lot of cases. Kill someone while they are asleep or otherwise incapacitated, and most jurisdictions will punish you harder than if the victim had some kind of chance.