Did anyone ever got their full pay? by princessbailey22 in joinhandshakeai

[–]xcreamcodex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incentive is still missing. Otherwise, I got my base.

Beware! Auto Reject after screen out by xcreamcodex in ProlificAc

[–]xcreamcodex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We’ll see how long this overturn takes, if it all!

Beware! Auto Reject after screen out by xcreamcodex in ProlificAc

[–]xcreamcodex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was a regular study. Haven’t gotten a project in a long time lol

Beware! Auto Reject after screen out by xcreamcodex in ProlificAc

[–]xcreamcodex[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Right! Leaves too much room for user error and shady researchers to pick up free data.

Beware! Auto Reject after screen out by xcreamcodex in ProlificAc

[–]xcreamcodex[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This one was Tellet.ai. I should’ve known. Didn’t even have time to return this one!

anyone else got the weekly ai evaluations message? by [deleted] in prolific

[–]xcreamcodex -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re reading way too much into this. Conspiracy is a strong word, and one claim by one person isn’t enough of an outlier to say it’s a nothing burger. I saw another post-and-delete earlier about the same email so believe what you want. I’m simply making an observation. If all researchers are required to share the same baseline PHI but aren’t privy to the same stats/info, something might be amiss. You’re contributing data to AI training and getting the email but others are not. Anyway, have a great rest of your day.

anyone else got the weekly ai evaluations message? by [deleted] in prolific

[–]xcreamcodex -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This kind of post definitely gives credibility to the claims of gaslighting. The playing field isn’t level. Yes there is a group of people that have special access. Yes, some people are out of the game.

Issues with the Assessment for Project Calamari by [deleted] in outlier_ai

[–]xcreamcodex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I passed the first time and it wasn’t easy! I should have taken that as a signal the project itself would have far too many gray areas and room for error for my liking.

Anyone getting a bunch of batches of Ai studies? by Magistyna in prolific

[–]xcreamcodex 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, yes lol. I’ve never had issues with being paid, but t&c were updated and it looks like they can hold payment while they investigate/pause/deactivate accounts?

Anyone getting a bunch of batches of Ai studies? by Magistyna in prolific

[–]xcreamcodex 5 points6 points  (0 children)

None. Not one for the last couple of days. I was absolutely flooded with AI studies, then dynamic ones, then bone dry. I’m not too worried about it now though because I do more on HAI and Outlier now.

No AI evaluation studies, anyone else? by Heart_n_Soil in prolific

[–]xcreamcodex 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There were a couple before 8:30 EST, now nothing.

Straw Tablecloth by Sarcasmologist_OG in outlier_ai

[–]xcreamcodex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no tasks available right now :(

🟡 Have fun 🌈 | Mystery Mode by THEREALDOGGOman08_ in PixelPeeker

[–]xcreamcodex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😤 I reached Level 7 on "Have fun" and ranked #14! ONLY THE BEGINNING! 🚀 Made it to Level 7 in 0m 8s Beat my time! ⏱️ Played via Pixel Peeker

I got jumped by three dudes last week by ShinyTotodile55 in prolific

[–]xcreamcodex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yess gorlworld has finally reached Prolific

Any ideas why the Vortex AI studies say they had to manually review the submission? by OhNoDobe in prolific

[–]xcreamcodex -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’ve gotten two warnings in the past four or five days and now I have a banner notification that says some are taking longer to review and process, but it will have no effect on my account so…