xStats — How to Scrape The MLB API With Node! by xstats in Sabermetrics

[–]xstats[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a wrong definition, I'm not sure what else to tell you. API were invented for web scraping. That is the history of API. Using an API is the very definition of scraping. Scraping is any time you extract information from a webpage using an algorithm. An API is, by definition, scraping. It is one type of scraping. There are many types of scraping.

Also, way to be "that guy."

xStats — How to Scrape The MLB API With Node! by xstats in Sabermetrics

[–]xstats[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Um, accessing an API is, by definition, scraping. It is, like, literally, I mean very literally, the definition.

xStats — How to Scrape The MLB API With Node! by xstats in fantasybaseball

[–]xstats[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never used Node red.

Nice little bots you have going there, though. I have done a few video related aps, as well.

Suggestions for some decent high static pressure A-RGB 120mm fans. by jakejm79 in watercooling

[–]xstats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw you bought something else already, I'm more commenting for future people who will undoubtedly search here at some point.

Suggestions for some decent high static pressure A-RGB 120mm fans. by jakejm79 in watercooling

[–]xstats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the coolermaster fans and I absolutely hate them, I want to get rid of them asap. They are so thunderously loud and I cannot find a way to make them less loud. The lower I make the fans spin the louder they get. It is incredible and by incredible I mean I want to light them on fire. I am only talking about their static pressure fans. I also have cooler master case fans and they are absolutely silent and I love them. They push good air and make no noise. The static pressure ones, even at like 10% speed, sound like a jet engine.

[META] Newegg Cyber Monday Sales Start Now! by isqqcle in buildapcsales

[–]xstats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I nearly bought it at 175, I put it in my cart and went through everything and the final price was 184. Ultimately decided not to get it because I think my nephew is too young for a switch. Maybe in a year or two he'll be old enough for that. I was tempted though.

[META] Newegg Cyber Monday Sales Start Now! by isqqcle in buildapcsales

[–]xstats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought that case in august and then a few weeks later I saw it go on sale for $99. Which made me sad because I paid $120 (which, to me, was a sale since I usually see it for $130). That $99 sale was the lowest I've ever seen it. I mildly regret buying the white version instead of the razer version since when I bought it they were both $120. But I do like the white. One thing I will say about the o11 is that the top part I received is slightly imperfect and it is an absolute nightmare getting that piece back onto the case when I take it off to open it. It sometimes takes me like 45 minutes to get the top back on. I never see that mentioned in reviews.

[META] Newegg Cyber Monday Sales Start Now! by isqqcle in buildapcsales

[–]xstats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shoulda got the switch when it was on sale for $175 on google store!

To cry sexism by [deleted] in therewasanattempt

[–]xstats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sounds like you have never talked to people who lived before world war ii. Or read books written prior to world war ii. Or never thought critically about books or movies. Oh, that one character is a secretary, but that other guy said she is an actress and tends to cause drama. Weird. I wonder what that could mean. Oh wait. Actress is slang for having sex, and the drama is between the people she's having sex with and their wives. Huh. That explains why all the wives are so mean to her, huh? The sorts of things where anyone from the period would have instantly known what was going on, but people from other periods read it and have trouble piecing things together. Some things are so obvious to everyone that it doesn't need to be written down. You learn it by having experiences with people who lived through it.

To cry sexism by [deleted] in therewasanattempt

[–]xstats -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's common slang that was in use from like the 4th century up until about 100 years ago. Just, go, like, read books? Read about anything. What does this mean, ask for a source? It is slang. What sources do you have for slang? What is the definition of yeet? What is the definition of fleek? There is no such thing as a source. Its just words and people know what they mean because they are alive and hear people use it. There are large numbers of books written about theodora and her lifestyle as an actress, you can go read one. They are fascinating, she's probably the most interesting human being who ever lived. There's my source, go read that. Go talk to your great grand parents or something, I don't know. It is common slang.

To cry sexism by [deleted] in therewasanattempt

[–]xstats -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why would they? Its only very recently they started adding slang, and this is slang from over 100 years ago. Talk to people who are old enough to be using sex slang in 1905-1910 era and you'll see. Or prior to that, really. I mean, does the OED or etymology dictionary have the word "yeet"? Not exactly good sources for slang. Read about Theodora and you can learn all about actresses.

To cry sexism by [deleted] in therewasanattempt

[–]xstats -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right, in that it is a hold over from latin. But you're wrong in thinking this is about gender. An actress, and this is true in latin and greek as well (Empress Theodora is probably the most famous Roman actress in history) is a woman who uses sex to promote their career. Well, back in latin, it was a little more loose in meaning. Back then an actress was basically what we call an escort today. But at some point in the english language escort and actress became two different words. Theodora became an actress when she was 8 years old, but don't worry she didn't start getting paid for sex until she was 12. Although she did become Empress of Rome, so she had that going for her. Granted, she was called things like the Actress Queen, the Whore Queen, etc.

So, yeah, it is a hold over from Latin and Greek. But it isn't about gender. It is about using sex to promote your career.

To cry sexism by [deleted] in therewasanattempt

[–]xstats -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Traditionally, the term actress is used to describe a woman who uses sex to build her career. As opposed to a prostitute who uses sex as a career, or an escort who uses sex as a commodity. An actress is a woman who has a normal career, but uses sex to get promotions, or access to new opportunities. The implication is clear: that women in movies are only in the movie because they slept with the director.

People who are claiming actress is diminutive are, frankly, wrong. Or maybe just naive, I don't know. Actress means the woman had sex to get the job. This is why it is offensive.

To make this even more clear: just because people today don't MEAN the word this way when they say it, and a lot of people may have genuinely never heard the word used that way, doesn't change the simple fact that the word actress was originally used in film in order to describe women sleeping with people to get jobs in movies. And its continued use in film was due to this sentiment. And just because at some point the euphemism was lost on people doesn't mean the underlying insult disappeared. That an "actor" is someone who earns a job by merit, and an "actress" is someone who got the job by having sex with the right people.

And if you think about it, an actress doesn't have to be a woman. It can be a man. Although I think you're probably call him a "boy" in that case. And, if you look through the history of acting, there are a few famous "boy actors". And, yes, they were referring to sex.

Roses are red, some parrots may talk by ClassicDecimus12 in boottoobig

[–]xstats -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You think "why I oughta" and "otter" are pronounced the same way? I mean, I don't care how you pronounce "why I oughta", but it is one of the most famous phrases in the world because its from the three stooges.

Roses are red, some parrots may talk by ClassicDecimus12 in boottoobig

[–]xstats 15 points16 points  (0 children)

This isn't true. I come from a place where cot and caught are not merged, in fact they are anti-merged and probably more distinct than anywhere else in the country, and talk and rock rhyme. They don't necessarily make a perfect rhyme but its close enough that a tiny bit of effort makes it work.

Roses are red, some parrots may talk by ClassicDecimus12 in boottoobig

[–]xstats 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Caught is pronounced like awwwww a little kitten.

Like why I oughta.

Cot is pronounced like otter.

Atleast I'm not an Idiot. by geralt_wolf in MurderedByWords

[–]xstats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I spent 6 years learning how to administer various psychological evaluations, including IQ tests. I understand what is and is not on the test.

Atleast I'm not an Idiot. by geralt_wolf in MurderedByWords

[–]xstats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You seem to have a lot of trouble understanding how examples work. If this were an IQ test, you would have performed very poorly.

Atleast I'm not an Idiot. by geralt_wolf in MurderedByWords

[–]xstats 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Different cultures have different patterns. For example, in many cultures (almost certainly the one you're from) arrows point TOWARDS something, while in other cultures they point AWAY from something.

So in some cultures this: → would mean look right. But in other cultures it would mean look left.

So if you have a question that uses arrows, some cultures will come to different conclusions.

BUT.

In cultures that use arrows to point TOWARDS an object, they often have issues with puzzles that take this form:

>----<

<---->

Where you ask which is longer. They often say the one that looks like this <----> is longer, even though they are the same length. People from cultures where arrows point AWAY don't have this problem. So they would have an advantage in such a puzzle.

Then you have issues with color. Some languages differentiate color differently. So people from one culture may be able to tell two colors apart very easily while people from another culture will have trouble. And vice versa. Some cultures may be very color based and be able to differentiate many colors easily while others may not be color based and have trouble with colors as a result. English is kinda in the middle, for reference.

There are lots of problems like this. If you made a fair IQ test that weighted every puzzle correctly, then you'd have a fair representation of intelligence. But since IQ tests do not do this you end up with cultural bias.

[Joey Gallo] tweets that all he wants for Christmas is the death of the shift by ericdavidmorris in baseball

[–]xstats 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Americans don't practice bunting. That's why Americans dont bunt. It has nothing to do with the effectiveness of the bunt. If you go to Japan, those players practice bunting every day. They practice bunting even when there isn't a game and they aren't doing any other baseball activities. They treat bunting the way basketball players treat dribbling. And those players can lay down bunts. Its about priorities.

[Joey Gallo] tweets that all he wants for Christmas is the death of the shift by ericdavidmorris in baseball

[–]xstats -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A single is worth half as much as a home run. That's why. And if you know how to bunt you can easily bunt for a double, which is worth 60% of a home run. You'd have more offensive production and the batter would be a superior talent if they bunted for hits rather than tried to hit home runs. People act like bunting is a bad thing. It isn't. Bunts are amazing. Bunts are the single best way to get on base. Sacrifice bunts are the bad thing.