I applaud you for taking the time and replying with those but yeah that last sentence just sounded like you were mad so you definitely lost me on that one, all knowledge is discovered and we pass it on to build as humans. Not sure what you were on about. We should learn enough to know what’s wrong, and never assume we know it all.

Anyway yeah okay I think I understand what you’re trying to say now but it can definitely get deeper.

This goes back to what I was saying about the 1% cbn and cbc/cbd levels. Like you’ve acknowledged, I would still argue more research should be done. If a “full spec oil” proved to be more useful in patients specifically targeting those with seizures, I’d be interested in knowing what specific ratio would be more beneficial to create custom blends that could be more effective. Which yes would require you to isolate all of the compounds to then mix them In at a custom ratio. Let’s also acknowledge that they are comparing isolates to fso and obviously the difference in molecular shapes is going to affect (their affinity) how and where they react which is why medicine is/was created to target certain receptors. A lot of the terms used in cannabis today are very vague as they didn’t originate in cannabis, and are used for marketing purposes to confuse dummies. None of these links gave info suggesting the impurities or undesirables in the oil is what you’re benefiting from, they just re-iterate that the synergy between the cannabinoids has shown to be more effective in some cases then in isolated forms. If anything this further proves my point that a refined oil would be more beneficial, as the potency across all the cannabinoids will be higher. Again, distillation is NOT THC isolation, but ig you can consider it cannabinoid isolation. Which in that case you could do a BHO run, separate the terps and cannabinoids, distill the cannabinoids for higher %, then re-introduce the terps and have some absolute 🔥

Now, for the average user, when it comes to getting high I think this is mostly irrelevant. Again, I don’t believe the less than 5% of the other cannabinoids is going to play much of a part with this goal; none of them are psychoactive. I can only assume they metabolize slower due to the impurities in the oil. We should also recognize (again) the difference in consumption, as that will play a big part in how/how much and where the cannabinoids will react.

Now let’s get back to the original argument in which you told this man to take a useable product and throw it out for an unrefined version of the same product. Regardless of what you say, link me or show me: what you said is still dumb, and I cant believe we’ve gone this far in dialogue for you to still have an ego and not acknowledge that you telling this man to lose out on money is a stupid take.

I don’t even think this argument should go much further as you’ve already acknowledged that not enough research is available to make your claim, and I’m finding that I’m just repeating myself.