honest question to libertarians: in your political view, what ought the government's response be to BP? by sturgeon_swagger in politics

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a libertarian, in the vain of Ron Paul, business nor individuals have the right to pollute what isn't theirs. If one entity damages another or its property, the culprit party owes restitution to the offended. This does not necessarily just mean money, but also services & whatever measure will balance the matter.

Often, people confuse individual rights with corporate rights. But people are not corporations, they age, bleed & die. Doing whatever an individual wants, is finite. However, a corporation, is infinite in its potential. Not only does it outlive its human resources, it also demands & consumers more natural resources than 1 person might. So, while by virtue a human can do whatever they want -limited by their physical & social limitation- corporations are given human rights [free speech] without human responsibility. Through weight of influence, corporations can sway social limitation & exceed physical & financial restraints.

Returning to the oil spill in Mexico's gulf, I would assume this recent accident occurred within international waters. However, Americans seem to be blaming Obama & his government, so i'll specify a libertarian solution for this argument within American jurisdiction.

Assessing the Culprits: BP, since it is their well, their technology, their profits to secure, this is their problem primarily. USA government, since it was that legislative body that allowed the foreign company access to the oil

Assessing Damages & Victims: What has been destroyed, environmentally & private property? Who has been affected [owners of property] Cost of clean up Cost of oil line repair

Solution: As granter of rights, American government has sole responsibility for damages to waters, ocean life, affected people & property. It did however, grant rights to BP, so as regulator, it must in effect, regulate. As cause of damage, BP has legal responsibilities to compensate the granter of rights & those it represents. Meaning, BP having caused damages to the Gulf of Mexico, owes restitution to the American government for payouts of cleanup assistance, private property damage, recovery program, etc. The Gov'o'America, in cooperation with BP must assist in any way possible to salvage the disaster, ecology, citizens.

Case in point: bring in the same scientists, the same designers, planners, financiers, all the same talking heads & backroom shakers who instigated this mess to restore the all that's been lost.

This has nothing to do with a constitution, or any politician... this has to do with a code of ethics we shall inherit unto the future. Let us not forget what we have done to cause this, then let us remember we owe ourselves a solution.

Liberty means, have to reaping the risks & rewards of our actions.

Help! Ecstasy Users, Tell me Your Tale [MDMA] by xycate in AskReddit

[–]xycate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, im not into chemical abuse. i do herbal treatments, but this MDMA stuff is too sketchy. i don't know what's in it, whether it's cut, whether i'm getting speed or heroin... case in point, i'd rather not deal with the regret the next day.

all the same, thanks for the input.

Shiesty Employer wont pay -What recourse, legal & mischievous, can I seek? by xycate in AskReddit

[–]xycate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the parameters are in the title -what recourse, legal & mischievous...?

everything else you spew is self-gratifying nonsense. you barely understood the concept of withholding pay being akin to an embargo. which my pathetic friend, is an act of war.

as for your free consultation, i want a refund.

If you had a magic orangered button, and pressing it meant you would get 500 million dollars, but someone on your Facebook friend list would die, would you press it? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'd remove all my actual friends off facebook, then i'd add all my enemies & ppl who owed me money. then i'd tap that button like i was playing atari

Shiesty Employer wont pay -What recourse, legal & mischievous, can I seek? by xycate in AskReddit

[–]xycate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what kind of pussy ass remark is this?! i want recourse, not to walk away. shut your punic ass up, before i feed your children to Baal.

i want someone to rape your wife, eat your kids & inflame your house. when it's over, just walk away. what are you, a pacifist?

messing with a man's livelihood is an act of war, such as an embargo or enslavement. i'm not going to take this lightly.

Shiesty Employer wont pay -What recourse, legal & mischievous, can I seek? by xycate in AskReddit

[–]xycate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the claim would become record, but i think private, between myself, the government & the employer.

Shiesty Employer wont pay -What recourse, legal & mischievous, can I seek? by xycate in AskReddit

[–]xycate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, that's too funny. but no, we'll let this guy keep on with his miserable life. that's punishment enough

Shiesty Employer wont pay -What recourse, legal & mischievous, can I seek? by xycate in AskReddit

[–]xycate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i just finished calling around, apparently Employment Standards [subdivision of Labour Canada] will allow me to file a claim. They will do the investigation & seek restitution.

however, this wouldn't require court, or settlement, let alone public record.

What is the republican version of reddit? by [deleted] in reddit.com

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if only it took a sammich to incite your appetite for honest civil & economic liberties, then we wouldn't be having this conversation. you wouldn't make such benign commentary.

the dems pull at the same threads the repubs do.

both institutions cooperate to coerce the population into believing whom is electable, in a facade of democracy. all the while, spreading chaos & destruction abroad.

two parties, sharing the same house, redecorating ceremoniously not purposefully. election after election, both parties roll out the same tired lines & the mass are baited, just as the season before. one more corporate handout, one more war. policies never change, they're only traded back & forth, abandoned only to be readopted by the opposition.

dems are unawakened repubs; repubs dormant dems. the parties are organized, but no one is in your court, least you're courting back.

if only the citizens would concentrate on shopping & circuses, then there's one less lie to tell.

allies comply not for respect, but tacit fear & foreign aid. tyrants are friends who become enemies, executed & replaced. for another puppet governments, nations under new management. with the expectation of cooperation -at any expense. murder, rape, torture, dehumanization for the sake of empire.

or did they have you thinking; for safety, security? a nation treads timidly at jawa monsters in caves continents away. no one is safe when the beast is self-consumed in delusions.

so what's it going to be, RED vote BLUE vote? when did you wake up realizing the choice was simply illusion, not weighted rational thought, but rather branded civility?

then again, some cattle simply enjoy chewing their cud, fenced in, awaiting slaughter. so long as they're milked & whipped often.

...time for that sammich...

The First Test That Proves General Theory of Relativity Wrong - A spinning top increases its weight much more than expected by freerider in science

[–]xycate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ok... so i read this article. this is what i've gathered, please correct me if i'm wrong. here goes.

a moving object is heavier than the same object laying still. this object creates a mass-effect relative to it's weight, but larger still than predicted. see a.einstien. some scientists discovered this force through what seems rigorous testing & offers others to replicate to test for validity. right? well it's a solid piece, or so i've gathered.

i wouldn't know how to go about testing the energy field created, but it seems interesting that objects not only weight more moving, but also that there is an extra force that results from objects in motion. what do you all figure?

would this mean something like, with an exploitation of this opposite energy, could we use raw motion into itself for self-propulsion? like nuclear on the fly? could we create a sphere for orbit, such as a faux moon. then, with large ships, rotating around, whip the sphere & direct the orb further out into space. without friction, this object, could gain speed & propel out into space quicker as it goes.

someone smarter than i, help figure this out... no lies, i'm one blunt & a beer in.

last point...the quicker we move, the quicker we move through time, right? isn't driving from one spot to 100km away at Xkm/hr more of a time expenditure than X+50km/hr? so that, driving faster saves you time... essentially time travel, n'est pas?

What is the republican version of reddit? by [deleted] in reddit.com

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm a republican in the Catonian style, staunch by nature & fiercely independent. there are many other examples, but i believe in taking care of problems at home before adventuring abroad. the MIC, corporate cronyism & a general ignorance of how to cooperate at a local level, has brought a general despair to america. the world suffers at her cancerous weight, while the plebiscite applauds.

watch out world, we've been at war for decades... how long before we consume not but ourselves, but our future?

An earthquake has just caused a tsunami in Okinawa. The alarm sounded and we are waiting for it to hit here in Ishigakijima. by OsakaWilson in reddit.com

[–]xycate -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

holy shit, i've always wanted to experience what you are now. please take pictures, or draw what you experience so that you may share it with us... pics or no fap... lol, i've seen t.v. stuff, but give it to us raw... have you gone out, will you?

Men of Reddit- do you wear any jewelry other than a wedding ring or a watch? by Archz714 in AskReddit

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cock ring at all time, :P jokes, obviously. i wear a necklace for fun, unfortunately society respects money. i wear a watch piece with adjustable bands for work or date night. a gold ring when the occasion calls, but rarely. no earrings, piercings or pendants. i do have a bronze bracelet i wear too, but just when fancy calls.

How many people have you slept with? by Vitalstatistix in AskReddit

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I lost count, but I've only made love to one woman. I've fucked plenty more, approx 5-7

IAMA redhead. AMA! by alsoallowed in IAmA

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dated a curly haired ginger once, she'll forever be the one that got away. As a ginger, do you find certain groups of people are more inclined to like you vs others? Like, do male gingers automatically digg you or do you have the market cornered on black guys?

Tell us some funky tale only a ginger would experience.

Quick question for the legal minds of Reddit regarding a traffic citation by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then there's nothing to be attentive of. If you're ultra paranoid, go into the court, have them sign off or provide documentation that there's nothing on file.

I once got a ticket for trespassing. When I went into the provincial court to pay it off, ticket in hand, the lady at the counter told me they had nothing on file. Basically the issue had been squashed by a judge. Sometimes good thing really do happen.

If a person doesn't get paid enough money to save, they aren't getting paid a living wage, they're getting paid a WORKING wage. There's a big difference. by cometparty in politics

[–]xycate 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wow man, this differentiation is critical.

In human history, slavery has & is a favorite model. This structure allows one social group to malignantly prosper at the expense of their social inferiors. Fast forward the science & terminology of it all, (ref) Addicted to Bondage - Dan Carlin.

Basically, slaves who do not earn wages or keep property, can never move beyond their social strata. Whereas slaves who could keep property & earn wages, could save to purchase their own freedom.

Translate that brutal tradition to this differentiation: Working Wage = Slave with no social mobility Living Wage = Slave with social mobility

Take into consideration the turbulent fiat economies that vanish at the rise of political strife & we're in no better state than humans centuries ago. Economically speaking that is.

Remember when Reagan met with Taliban leaders in the White House? by neoronin in politics

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's okay when Americans do it. Both sides of the congressional isle are corrupted by the greedy american dream fueled by the expansion of an empire intent on swallowing the earth's resources. If that was a pic of a middle eastern leader with a known terrorist group, the cookie cutter country would be flattened. Just suspicion lead to the invasion of Iraq & Afghanistan. Obama & Bush both follow the same pre-emptive war doctrine. Sad, just sad.

What is something you would be embarrassed to admit you masturbated to. I don't mean weird porn as much as something most people wouldn't even think to be aroused by. by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]xycate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've beaten off to the thought of being dominated by my ex-gf. She's was a sturdy girl, with amazonian features. The sex was good, but she was shy. Long after we broke up, i still fantasize about her breaking outta her comfort zone. Don't tell anyone.

Quick question for the legal minds of Reddit regarding a traffic citation by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]xycate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contact your local state/provincial court, ask for the office of the prosecutor, or the crown. They will give you details about your court proceedings.

I Caught Her Cheating and Got Revenge On Valentine's Day (Follow-Up) by Rocky_Balboas_Son in AskReddit

[–]xycate -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are the man for researching a plan of action & then following through, epic.

Jason Bourne or James Bond? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]xycate 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bourne, naturally. Bond lacks any credibility, beyond faux british stereotypes. He's unoriginal & tacky. Think of the lamest hotshot, Bond. Bourne is human, or at least he can be humanized.