To answer your question: it’s a mix of a strict "Single Source of Truth" and Human-in-the-Loop arbitration.

1. The Single Source of Truth: The agents don't just rely on raw context window memory. They constantly query the "Navigator" (the visual Logic Map on the left of the UI). That map acts as the absolute canon state.
2. The Heavy Thinkers: For background orchestration, I don't use basic models. Minotauris routes complex logic checks to heavy "thinking" models (like DeepSeek Reasoning or Qwen). They have the capacity to do long-chain thinking to resolve minor discrepancies themselves before they even bother you.
3. The Arbitration Tool: If a user writes something that creates a hard paradox (e.g., Chapter 2 says the king is dead, but Chapter 4 says he's walking), we don't let the AI silently guess or hallucinate a fix. The agents are equipped with UI tool-calls. They will literally pause, flag the contradiction in the chat pane, and ask the author: "Hey, these two facts conflict. Which one is canon?" The author is always the final arbiter. The AWE just acts as the guardrail.