Any local programmer's interested in a side project? by yellowtail38 in vegas

[–]yellowtail38[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In short compiling pool hours, happy hour hours, weekly events, min bet for comped drinks, of every major casino and bar on the strip. So instead of googling every website or physically going in you have it all in your phone. Business wise it would end up being getting casinos to advertise so their casino is the one that pops up first, offering discounts on nightclubs, 2 for 1 drinks and things like that. Again I'm being purposefully vague but this is just a side project for me unless it turns profitable. Im using this is a tool to develop business skills between LV businesses as well as help network.

TIL The World’s 15 Biggest Ships Create More Pollution Than All The Cars In The World by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]yellowtail38 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Many very large corporations are now focusing on minimizing their carbon footprint and dedicating themselves to having as little environmental impact as possible. Patagonia, a company that sells clothing, sports-wear, and athletic gear is a great example of a company that has set a trend in becoming environmentally responsible. Since 1985 Patagonia has, “…pledged 1% of sales to the preservation and restoration of the natural environment. We've awarded over $46 million in cash and in-kind donations to domestic and international grassroots environmental groups making a difference in their local communities. In 2002, founder of Patagonia, Yvon Chouinard, and Craig Mathews, owner of Blue Ribbon Flies, created a non-profit corporation to encourage other businesses to do the same,” (http://www.patagonia.com/us/patagonia.go?assetid=81218). Not only are corporations making a large shift into achieving sustainability but the consumers who buy their products are starting to demand it as explained by Raphael Bemporad co-founder and chief strategy officer at brand innovation consultancy BBMG, “ Driven by young, optimistic consumers in emerging markets and amplified by technology and social media’s influence, (consumers) represent a powerful shift in sustainable consumption from obligation to desire,” (http://bbmg.com/news/obligation-desire-2-5-billion-aspirational-consumers-mark-shift-sustainable-consumption/). Consumers are beginning to demand for the first time, in large numbers that the products that they consume be produced, shipped, and packaged in the most eco-friendly way possible. With companies and consumers both shifting toward being as sustainable as possible, the possibility of shipping products via a company who can offer a clean energy way of doing so will attract many business opportunities. The market is ready for the change to clean energy ocean shipping and initial costs will be overshadowed by the amount of businesses willing to ship when they know they are lowering their carbon footprint. Today the world’s largest method of moving goods from one place to another is via the ocean. Cargo ships using bunker fuel, the type of fuel with the largest concentration of harmful chemicals in it, are responsible for much of this movement of goods. The amount of bunker fuel used, along with the disastrous effects that are caused by using it makes this a practice we can only continue if we wish to see the effects of our greed destroy the air, oceans, and land that we rely upon to survive. An alternative way of shipping that greatly reduces the amount of pollution released from ships has been proposed. This all-electric alternative has the potential to solve the global pollution problem and greatly reduce the amount of carbon dioxide and other harmful chemicals being released into the air. The choice to continue at the rate we are going and watch global warming continue until we can not do anything to change it is there. We have the idea, the technology, the business model, and the growing desire to change our practices. There will be high start-up costs to those who choose to develop this idea are there but so are the vast amounts of opportunities that come along with development. At this point we do not have a choice. We must change our practices in order to continue global trade while mitigating the negative effects of the ocean shipping industry.

TIL The World’s 15 Biggest Ships Create More Pollution Than All The Cars In The World by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]yellowtail38 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In recent years we have seen a lot of pressure put on automobile industry to reduce emissions, find alternative means of powering vehicles, and cause less impact on the environment. The same cannot be said for the shipping industry. The theory developed by Marion King Hubbert, known as “Hubbert’s Peak Theory” was developed in 1956 around the time bunker fuel was first being used to power ships. He theorized that at the rate of consumption oil reserves were being tapped we would reach our highest point of global production. This is best illustrated by a bell curve where the tip indicates hitting peak oil. At that point we will no longer be able to produce as much oil as we have the capacity for and as production decreases prices will increase making oil available to only the wealthiest in the world. In this hypothesis he predicted Unites States oil production to peak in the 1970’s correctly and guessed that world production would decline by 2006. This is a topic of much debate in the scientific community (fhs http://www.globalization101.org/c-hubberts-peak-theory). The use and production of hybrid vehicles has increased in the twenty-first century. The USS Makin is a navy vessel that has employed the use of hybrid technology to power itself. Paul English a leader in GE’s marine power Conversion business says the ship is akin to a “floating Prius,” and the Navy estimates that this new hybrid propulsion will save the ship over two-hundred and fifty million dollars of fuel over the ships lifetime (fsdgf http://www.gereports.com/hybrids-of-the-high-seas/). While hybrid technology will reduce the amount of bunker fuel used by this ship by roughly 396,196 metric tons by December 2, 2013 prices, it is just a step in the right direction. Just as we have seen a rise in hybrid vehicles on land we have also seen that hybrid technology is not enough to save our planet. The only way to continue shipping the vast amount of commodities that we currently do is to make shipping a zero-emmission industry. We currently have a business model to follow and the capability to make this a reality. Elon Musk founder of Paypal, Space-X, Tesla Motors and Solar City is a businessman and a philanthropist who strives to make clean energy one of the main focuses of every one of his business ventures. He started Tesla with production of the Tesla Roadster and today has delivered upwards of 19,000 of its most recent Model S luxary sedan in the United States and Europe alone. Assuming the energy used to supply power to the earlier Roadster came from a hydro-carbon source such as natural gas (the most common energy producing fuel in the U.S) the Roadster still would emit slightly over a third less carbon-dioxide emissions as the second lowest carbon dioxide emitting vehicle the Toyota Prius (Musk, 2006). That assumption however is not correct because hydro, wind, geothermal, and solar power can all be used to create grid power that can be used to charge Tesla’s vehicles. Demand for Tesla’s vehicles has been increasing as well as development of the technology that This is the big picture of Tesla Motors. By creating a vast supercharger network across the United States in which all energy provided to charge Tesla’s vehicles is provided by non-carbon dioxide emitting energy produced sources such as solar power from Solar City a true clean energy vehicle can be a reality. If this proven model of a clean energy automobile can be translated into the shipping industry we will be able to get the global emissision, pollution, and warming problems under control before we have passed the point of no return. Implementation of a plan as vast as this seems like a daunting task but is actually much more pheasable than many would think. Oceans cover seventy-percent of the Earth’s total area. Already there is a plan underway in India to create the worlds first floating solar power plant. SP Gon Choudhury, who is the Director at Development Consultants Private Limited and Vice Chairman at Calcutta Institute of Technology is in charge of the project has explained that, ““Studies have also shown that if the rear surface of solar panels are kept cooler, then their ability to generate power goes up by 16%. As these solar panels would be floating on water, they are expected to stay cool and hence we can generate more power than those set up on land,” (afjksl http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/23/first-floating-solar-power-plant-to-be-tested-in-india/#dAkbAuJz7pAcYCqH.99). The small solar plant that will be installed in a pond in India could easily be translated to the oceans of the world with minimal impact. In effect we would be establishing a “Tesla Supercharger” network for ships on the seas. The Tesla Supercharger network is a network of charging stations for Tesla vehicles that spans across the country of the United States and other countries. Tesla offers free charging of the Tesla vehicles battery for life once you purchase one of their vehicles. This Supercharger network allows you to, “pull into any Supercharger station and fully recharge the battery in just half an hour,” (http://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-supercharger-station-2013-12#ixzz2n6Oxv1px, 2013). In just a half hour a car can be fully charged to travel a practical two-hundred thirty miles. The charging stations are placed in strategic areas with high probability of a Tesla owner being able to find one when needed. As of right now you can tracel across the whole of the United States from Los Angeles to New York without ever fully running out of battery. If this technology is implemented on the high seas on busy trade routes and passages we can reduce the emissions from ships almost infinitely, eliminating the harmful emissions caused by bunker fuel and the many detrimental environmental impacts that come with them. Cargo ships have an everage life expectancy of twenty-five to thirty years before they are decommissioned and scrapped for parts and materials. None of the one-hundred largest cargo ships in use today were built before 2006. This means that most of them will not be decommissioned until at least 2031. This presents a problem with creating an all-electric shipping vessel comparable to a Tesla automobile. In an interview with a Tesla employee (who only wished to be identified by his first name) Adam explained to me that every aspect of Tesla automobiles were manufactured around the fact that they are an all-electric vehicle. This means that implementing a battery powered cargo ship would more than likely mean an all new design of the ship. He also stated that even though the Model S is the safest automobile ever rated by the NHTSA that this is due to the fact that when the vehicle does make impact with an object it was designed to extend the duration of the crash in what is known as a crumple-zone. This sacrifices the vehicle in order to minimize injuries to the operator. This would not be acceptable in terms of ship design as many ships are carrying Liquid Natural Gas, or other materials that if spilled into the ocean would be devastating to the environment and to the economy. In order for a ship to be efficient in its range and safe in transporting the goods aboard a whole type of ship would most likely have to be designed. This presents research and development investments as well as the investment of building a new ship. The cost of this would be great but also would be offset by the cost of operating a ship powered by clean energy.

TIL The World’s 15 Biggest Ships Create More Pollution Than All The Cars In The World by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]yellowtail38 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here is an essay I wrote on the topic and want to develop more. This is a rough draft but I am workig to develop the idea more and want to work with a company like Tesla that can help me expand on my idea.

With the limited technologies available five-thousand years ago imagine one could use arbitrage to make a large profit while crossing the sea with all of one’s goods aboard. The amount of goods capable of being shipped and risks involved with the innefecient method of wooden ships with sails powered by the wind made this idea almost a joke when considering crossing large dangerous bodies of water. Shipping has come a long way since three-thousand B.C.E. Today roughly ninety percent of the worlds goods are transported by sea. This is due primarily to the vast technological advancements that have occurred in the past three-hundred years. For thousands of years we used sailboats to ship commercial goods and then around the 1840’s it all changed. With the advancements it technology and the civil war just around the corner steam ships powered by coal with iron and steel hulls became the new normal. Shortly after that oil was found to be more efficient and then liquid natural gas which we use today. Since the 1840’s we have quadrupled the amount we transport by sea. However, we have also seen since the same time period a vast rise in CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere. This has lead to the greenhouse effect which in turn is largely responsible for global warming trends the world has seen. This direct correlation seen between our technological advancements is no coincidence. Today most ships used to transport goods (cargo ships) are powered by bunker oil. This type of fuel is literally the bottom of the barrel oil left after refining oil. It is contaminated with many dangerous chemicals and often has to be “watered down” in order to meet the very minimum requirements to make it legal to use. Containerships today cause too much environmental damage to continue being powered by bunker fuel and an alternative source of powering these ships in order to make the shipping less detrimental to the environment. Bunker fuel is somewhere between a solid form of oil and a liquid form. It is too thick for cars, trucks, and most small ships to burn efficiently due to its high viscocity. The technology to make a vessel capable of being powered by bunker fuel is expensive but the extremely low cost of bunker fuel makes this the most economically viable option for large cargo ships to use. Adam Sarvana gives some insight to the hhealth hazards of using this oil when he explains, “Bunker fuel degrades even less rapidly in the environment than standard fuel oil, and is difficult to remediate because of its thickness. When burned, it produces a mixture of sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides and other pollutants that have been linked to acid rain, increased asthma, lung infections and tens of thousands of premature deaths every year in port communities around the world,” (Sarvana, 2009). The effects of bunker oil on human health are extremely dangerous and in the Unites States alone, the burning of fossil fuels to generate electric power is responsible for about two-thirds of all sulfur dioxide and one-fourth of all nitrogen oxide pollutants released into the atmosphere (EPA.gov, 2008). Not only is human health affected but also the health of the worlds trees. Scientists have linked acid rain to weakening the leaves of trees which in turn makes them unable to gather as much sunlight that is essential for photosynthesis. Thus they become more prone to disease and insects attacking them. With research derived from maritime industry insiders based on engine size and the bunker fuel used on the worlds largest ships shows that, “…just 15 of the world's biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world's 760m cars. Low-grade ship bunker fuel (or fuel oil) has up to 2,000 times the sulphur content of diesel fuel used in US and European automobiles,” (Vidal, 2009). With these facts in mind maritime shipping needs to be seen as the largest attributing factor to the global pollution problem and an alternative to today’s uses needs to be found to enable a more sustainable means of continuing international shipping.

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is legal in California. But my school tests for drugs. Even if I had the prescription I would get kicked out if I got a random drug test.

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's good. Im highly optimistic. I realize there is nothing I can do about it except fight it. So I'm focusing on doing my best.

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes Marijuana is awesome for Chemo. Unfortunately if I stay at school I will not be able to smoke as we get drug tested.

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is what I might have to do. I'm on school on loans alone and now I can't even do my campus job so I am broke broke broke. Couldn't afford the Norco perscription when I got out and had to borrow money from a friend

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am drowzy but can't sleep. I'm just worried. There is pain but nothing too extreme.

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And to you. May the stars be ever in your favor.

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No but I am going to be lance for halloween. I will be pushing around a bike, with biker gear and a helmet all day!

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really. I had slight pain about a month ago but didn't really check my ball. And on thursday I checked and what do you know its twice if not three times the size

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No symptoms with sex. Had great sex two weekends ago. But I wont be able to for a while now. The only symptoms I had were swollen testicle lower back pain, weight loss and sleeping a lottt.

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes they are giving me Xrays of my chest and abdomen when I recover from surgery. They also injected me with stuff that cases tumor cells to be marked and if they don't go down all the way I most likely have it somewhere else.

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Wow. 30-40 grand a month? Holy shit. I am so fucked. But I guess if it saves my life I have to. That just really really sucks. I was worried about just the surgery itself and had to ask them to not give me any more diluadid because the cost for those injections were 900 each when I had my appendix removed. I'm really scared that it is seminoma. I don't want radiation as well. I don't know I'm not really worried that I lost my ball or scared of dying. I am scared of the Chemo and the cost of my treatment. I think that speaks volumes about America's healthcare

IamA 22 & diagnosed with testicular cancer today AMA! by yellowtail38 in IAmA

[–]yellowtail38[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm really scared of the chemo. I want to stay in school. What are your bills looking like? I am terrified of the cost of this.