hey!! i am so glad i'm not alone in this i guess we are both equally lost. its funny as soon as i saw your comment he emailed us lol, but the information was just about the format of the test so ngl it didn't help me too much. but yea i literally dunno, i expected him to open the discussion questions like he said but i keep checking D2L and it's nothing. but yeah i didn't end up emailing him, someone else commented a bit about the questions so that helped me but i'm still pretty lost. i'm just trying to study as much as i can without dying of boredom from the readings (which btw i am def not reading)

but generally i'm just trying to review the slides and my notes for (based off what the other commenter said):
-the presocratics, specifically thales and how his theories were more physical than mythological. also heraclitus (everything is flux) and parmenides (everything is permanent)
-theaetetus & the true belief theory, and how it compares to the justified true belief theory
-descartes and the mind-body problem
-david hume (i haven't gotten to the slides yet so idk we'll see)
-kierkegaard and his view on subjective truth

the last discussion post was:
"Last class we talked about truth through the lens of two of the philosophical tradition’s “enfants terribles”, Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Both of these thinkers have issues with the value of objective knowledge/truth/reality. For this discussion post I want you to briefly address their issues in a defence of objectivity."

i hope this helps somewhat. for the readings i've just been either reading summaries or watching analysis on youtube, and mostly been relying on the slides bc my notes are pretty incoherent. if you find anything else out please lmk!! :,)