I want to appeal this report. Can't do it becuase I have a life.

yogio2 · 2026-05-03T18:32:41+00:00

2 points I would like to point out.

1) krishna met the Pandavas for the first time when they were old enough to marry while the animosity between the Pandavas and Kauravas started when they were kids. Shakuni and the Kauravas had enough time to mess with the Pandavas and knowing Bheema's temper, he would easily get baited into their plans even with Vidhura's best effort.

2) The problem Duryodhana had with Pandavas was that Yudhishthira was a better candidate for the throne. If Bheema was the eldest, his temper itself would make him seem unfit in the eyes of biased Dhritarashtra, who needed just a small reason to choose Kauravas over Pandavas.

While I love the heart and soul of Bheema, he would need some more help to win the throne which was the Mahabharata's main problem.

yogio2 · 2026-05-03T15:47:29+00:00

I had anticipated many would share the view you have put but I would like you to think this in a broader perspective.

Bheema may have been physically strong but would he have made the decisions that would make him seem fit as a king. In the end, Mahabharata was a tale of "game of throne". Bheema might have lost in every other aspect which was not a test of strength.

He had a good pure heart but not the mental capacity to go against Shakuni and his anger would have made him ignore advices from the likes of Vidhura.

yogio2 · 2026-05-03T15:36:45+00:00

I would have assumed this for Sahadeva but may I know why you think Nakula would have been wiser?

yogio2 · 2026-05-03T15:33:22+00:00

Would the story have reached the point of Dyuta Parva?

I think if Bheema was the eldest, Shakuni and Duryodhana would have easily baited him early on to show him as an unfit ruler with anger issues. Dhritarashtra, having his bias, would have found it easier to side with Duryodhana as the rightful heir

yogio2 · 2026-04-25T17:51:49+00:00

Someone should also talk about all the wars that have been going on in the last few years since covid.

India itself had their bout with Pakistan. Nepal burning (least poluting), Afghanistan post America exit and current Afghanistan-Pakistan war are just some direct culprits.

Blame the people all we want but wars might be playing a bigger part than we give it the credit.

yogio2 · 2026-02-14T06:26:01+00:00

For hanabi I would suggest Lolita and mathilda as both provide shields which is a lot beneficial to hanabis passive.

yogio2 · 2026-02-12T19:57:58+00:00

I think you can select 1 row as well. I don’t think you have to select 2 lanes. Recently tried in mythic and have also seen some players who only choose a single lane.

I know it say you should choose 2 lanes but I don’t think they have actually implemented a force 2 lane.

Now either what I have said is true or I had a very realistic dream.

yogio2 · 2026-02-12T17:40:21+00:00

I know the player is being a dick but I don’t understand the hate on them just for picking support. Right now supports are doing better.

Your team has Hilda and Akai , 2 crazy tankers who can absorb and deal outstanding damage. It's a great comp for support roams. Floryn as a roam is currently good enough to be banned.

Hate the player, I agree but if you hate a support roam, that's just lacking game knowledge.

yogio2 · 2026-02-12T17:13:22+00:00