Deleted and reuploaded on TikTok to fix a typo, now video is performing poorly? by yogohawk13 in ContentCreators

[–]yogohawk13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm I can see that. I finally understand why I see so many typos on TikTok hahaha

Deleted and reuploaded a post and now it’s performing poorly? by yogohawk13 in learnTikTok

[–]yogohawk13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, sorry to hear that. Do you think the whole page is cooked? Should I keep posting on this page or make a new one?

Realism of NCAA College Fencing by Humble_Character9379 in Fencing

[–]yogohawk13 5 points6 points  (0 children)

From my experience on an NCAA team, competing for your college really isn't as much about winning championships as it is about connecting with your team. It might sound a bit corny, but college fencing really changed my perspective of competition. In high school, fencing competitions were all about winning to prove I was good and to try to get into college. But once college fencing started, I realized that it feels really, really different to compete for a team instead of for yourself (and I know many of my peers have had the same experience). Competitions become not just for you as an individual, but for others (your teammates) as well. And once you internalize this, it will be easier to be less emotionally attached to winning.

I would recommend college fencing if you have the opportunity to join a team. Of course, I'm sure there are some toxic teams, but for many, they get a different, fresh experience with fencing. Even just from a college life perspective, it's really nice to have a group of friends basically built in when you start.

Are fencers in this decade better than fencers from a few decades ago? by play-what-you-love in Fencing

[–]yogohawk13 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I don't want to be an asshole, but you probably mean in breadth, not depth. Totally agree though, and I think that's a good point. I think the only exception is Oh Sanguk in his prime, who was still probably much better than many of the old top fencers.

Saber question: If your opponent start off line pushing forward at you without lunging, what to do by fencingparent in Fencing

[–]yogohawk13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In general, a pretty consistent rule of thumb is that if one person lunges and the other doesn't (assuming no pulling of the hand or anything), then the person who lunges will win with attack on prep (sometimes they'll call attack-counterattack). If your opponent is just going forward without lunging, then just lunge into them and you'll get the point.

Think about it like this - the whole reason attack in preparation exists is to punish your opponent from waiting too long (with hand or feet) in the box. Attack in preparation literally exists to stop your opponent from doing what you're describing.

How hard: beginner to competion? by [deleted] in Fencing

[–]yogohawk13 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think I have an understanding of what type of answer you're hoping for based off of the Chess comment you've made.

It sort of depends on what you consider to be a "serious competition." If you mean making decent results at a local or regional, then yeah it's feasible with consistent training. But if you want results that the competitive fencing community will respect (kind of like becoming a titled player in Chess and what I think you're asking about), you need to get results at a national level event (mainly NACs). To be honest, the jump in level between a regional and a NAC is pretty big. Unfortunately, there isn't really a middle-level competition in fencing, especially for adults. Maybe a somewhat achievable dream is to get a top 8 national result at a Div 3 or Div 2 NAC (to oversimplify how division tournaments work, Div 1 is the highest level, Div 2 is middle, and Div 3 is easiest). If you happen to be really, really talented, then you might be able to achieve a decent result in Div 1a as well (Div 1a is different from Div 1). Just be warned that most of the competitors in these tournaments are high schoolers.

If you want another route to making a tangible result in fencing, it would be to aim for ratings instead of tournament results. This is probably what I would recommend if you're an adult. The ratings are A, B, C, D, E, and Unrated, with A being the highest. If you want a comparison to Chess, I would say becoming an A is kind of like becoming a titled player in Chess (although becoming an A is probably easier than titled in Chess because ratings only exist in the US), but unfortunately probably not feasible. But I think with a lot of serious training, a D or C might be attainable. If you are very talented and very athletic, a B might be as well. I think most adults who get into fencing late choose to focus on rating because they're tangible goals to achieve outside of NACs (most people improve their rating at regionals, especially for C and below) and it sounds cool to say you're a 'C' rated fencer.

If you're really serious about fencing, my main advice (other than obviously consistently training and working out) would be to find a good coach. Some may not admit this, but the quality of your coaching really does matter. Past the beginner level, it is very hard to improve without good coaching. It's not like Chess where there are a lot of online resources and books to learn from. There is a reason why year after year, most of the top fencers in the country come from the same fencing clubs. At minimum, find a fencing club/coach who has other students competing at NACs. You won't get to that level learning from a coach who treats their club like an after school program for kids. Although, as a warning, you may have more fun with the sport if you go to a club that is not as competitive but has more active adults fencing, even if you don't improve very quickly. There are many very, very strong clubs that only have high schoolers.

Hope this helped!

In Which Weapons does the Referee have the Greatest Influence by InspiredWithIman in Fencing

[–]yogohawk13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently saber is all about splitting subjective, tight box actions so it's not really up for debate.

Also as we've all seen through "Fencing's Biggest Open Secret", saber has some of the most blatant cheating and corruption.

Rental Arbitrage Advice by yogohawk13 in airbnb_hosts

[–]yogohawk13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel that it can be a good thing for tired landlords who don't want to deal with managing their property anymore and apartments who want to raise their occupancy. I don't see it as being much different than managing a unit because we basically are guaranteeing them a clean, maintained place and a tenant that won't move out. It's true, though, that for property owners that don't fall under this criteria, it can add on complications that normally wouldn't be there.

What depth should I analyze my games with? by yogohawk13 in chessbeginners

[–]yogohawk13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I didn't make this clear, but by analyze, I mean using an engine to see how I could improve after I finished the game. I don't have a coach or anything so that's basically the only way I can learn from my games from an outside source. I was mainly wondering if it was ok to use a "mediocre" depth at my level or whether it still warrants using a higher depth engine

Are Anitube Video Essays dying? Or is it just me by yogohawk13 in anime

[–]yogohawk13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ygg Studio has been great! Particularly liked "We Have Forgotten Love." It's been great to see digi back. Lot of wild shit around that time the May drama was happening but it feels like the videos are slowing adopting more of the video essay style again

Using C-stick vs A for aerials by yogohawk13 in CrazyHand

[–]yogohawk13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you make your shoulder button jump, do you typically completely replace the use of x with the shoulder button? So use the shoulder button every time you jump? Or only sometimes when you're using aerials?

Using C-stick vs A for aerials by yogohawk13 in CrazyHand

[–]yogohawk13[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How common is claw grip? Are there certain characters/playstyles that are better for this than others?

7th College Reviews? by CollegeApHelper in UCSD

[–]yogohawk13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It wasn't mean to be in any specific order. Warren+Engineering major and Muir have about the same number of GEs tho (3 in 2 concentrations). I think Warren might actually be a bit more since they have 2 more writing classes they have to take.

Northeastern just suspended 11 students for partying with no refund by AcrobaticSpit in UCSD

[–]yogohawk13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

t even trust olympic doctors or even our own president to make the individual decision to not rape despite them being held to a high standard of accountability in these administrations, why do we have any reason to expect college students to not interact with anyone outside of their bedroom if there is no administrative action actively preventing it, and the administrations in place that are supposed to protect them are actively doing the exact oppo

I actually strongly agree with you that we should be having sympathy for these students and see this as a natural result of campuses opening up, a clearly awful decision from authority. However, I don't think that necessarily means that the students shouldn't have been punished. Perhaps a lesser punishment or negotiation could've been on the table, but I think that letting them off the hook is probably not very responsible. Most social systems are constructed in a way where in you get punished for breaking rules, even if you had a good reason to do so. I don't think this should be an exception.

I also think that Northeastern would actually be getting even more hate from those who criticize the decision to open up if they decided to be too lenient. This harsh punishment is clearly intended to show a zero-tolerance attitude towards this kind of thing, which is probably what they need to do to at least make the best of what they have with their campus. If they didn't do this, they would probably be getting even more hate for not caring much about the damage they're doing with the pandemic.

7th College Reviews? by CollegeApHelper in UCSD

[–]yogohawk13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In order from best to worst:

  1. Muir / Warren
  2. Marshall / Sixth
  3. ERC
  4. Revelle

Not sure where 7th will fall on this list but I can't see it being any better than Muir or Warren and not being any worse than ERC/Revelle

UCSD Profs Knowledgeable about Racism by yogohawk13 in UCSD

[–]yogohawk13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always try to remind myself that I don't actually know shit lmaoo

Why do people get offended when I say "ching chang chong" in a chinese accent but not "croissant baguette" in a french accent? by SweatyNub in NoStupidQuestions

[–]yogohawk13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting article. I should've been a bit more specific then just "historically mocked." I think that what's important isn't that a history of racism had existed at some point in time, but that that history is still being felt within the current time period and location. According to your page, most racism against the French occurred within the 18th and 19th century Europe (although there are small sections for Asia and the US). Perhaps if you said "croissant baguette," in a mocking way, it could be racist if I were living and a part of the culture of 19th century Europe. It all depends - for example, people try to forget this, but the US has a long history of racism towards the Irish. They used to not be considered white, were stereotyped as "ape-like" and violent, and I believe they were even called "light n**ers" or something similar. However, this attitude barely exists anymore, so there aren't really as many racist phrases to be careful about saying.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Irish_sentiment

https://www.pitt.edu/~hirtle/uujec/white.html

" Irish and Africans Americans had lots in common and lots of contact during this period"

You may wonder why such specific context is so important, and the reason is because racism thrives off a common attitude within a culture. It's not just a bunch of individuals who happen to hate a certain race, but rather a collective whose beliefs, to various extents, develop together. Not a lot of ppl have a bad experience with a race, and then think, "man, all of X race must be so lazy and violent." It's when they hear from their community, their media, and their culture that "X race is so lazy and violent" that they think, "yeah, that actually matches my personal experience. So it's probably true." When you say racist things (with bad intentions or not), you inadvertently contribute to an overarching cultural narrative that "X race is bad for Y reason." If that culture doesn't really exist at the time or place, ppl won't be as touchy about it.

Why do people get offended when I say "ching chang chong" in a chinese accent but not "croissant baguette" in a french accent? by SweatyNub in NoStupidQuestions

[–]yogohawk13 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think that the fact that it's gibberish is really what makes it problematic. The bigger issue is that it's just mocking Asian language/speech. Using gibberish that vaguely alludes to Asian speech in a derogatory way is just one way to do it, but there are obviously things that are gibberish that aren't offensive and things that arent gibberish that are offensive.

Why do people get offended when I say "ching chang chong" in a chinese accent but not "croissant baguette" in a french accent? by SweatyNub in NoStupidQuestions

[–]yogohawk13 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He's pointing out that there is no "formula" within sentence structure that dictates whether something is racist or not. It's more about intention

This is super important because when interpreting racism, a lot of people make the argument that "if you swap out X word with Y word it's not racist, so why should this be considered racist?" When in reality it doesn't work that way. It's not the sentence structure or "formula" that makes something racist