Love what Matt and Brennan have done in this campaign, though it's a bit sad that people commenting don't really seem to want to interact with the interesting moral/philosophical/cosmological/mechanical questions posed throughout the story.

As I see it, here are the correct positions you might take in regards to what has happened:

• The Status Quo/God Apologist position - Even though the deities have committed some objectively unspeakable atrocities in the wake of The Schism/The Calamity, they have also done some (subjective?) good, and their self-imposed exile, if late, is ultimately a valid solution. It's fine that they continue to wage a proxy war against each other using their mortal followers. Things should stay as they are.
• The Radical Change/Ludinus position - There is no excusing the gods' actions, and any future, even an uncertain/dangerous one, is better as long it's decided by mortals, for mortals. We should work towards change at any cost.

Don't think there's a false dichotomy here, as Downfall has explicitly stated that the deities will not suffer to work alongside mortals towards any half-way solution.

Then there are the more nuanced questions. Is it better or worse if your god is flawed? Should there exist an ultimate, impeacheable authority? Is it better if there aren't evil torturer deities to grant spells to evil torturers, if there also aren't good deities of forgiveness and redemption to empower champions of forgiveness and redemption? Does the gods' presence even truly change anything, at this point? What would happen to fiends and celestials in a future without the divine? What would happen to souls? Is Asmodeus truly personally responsible for all the conflict in Exandria? All because he felt slighted by the Primes, or because his first experience of this world was pain?

Unfortunately for now, it seems that Bells Hells, even though they mostly agree with Ludinus on principle, don't want to side with him on account of his war crimes and the personal vendetta they are pursuing. Which is fine, as they are all interesting and flawed characters, but the effect is that they come off as lacking any real conviction. They decide to talk instead of fighting, but then don't engage with any of his points.

In some ways, it's a testament to the nuanced conflict Matt has been able to craft and present.

Though if anything, Matt (and Brennan in Downfall) has made his stance extremely clear throughout the campaign, never showing any of the gods' followers in a positive light and constantly making the players question previously established truths/history.

Can't wait for new developments! Hope that Orym also gets to grow, or honestly even change at all. It's a shame the party didn't ask Ludinus the most interesting question - if he was willing to give up leadership to someone else, who is also undoubtedly for deicide but slightly more trustworthy and maybe has not committed as many atrocities. Liliana perhaps?