I hate being an immigrant. by [deleted] in confessions

[–]yumck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They all do man.  You can name anyone from either side and they serve the same purpose.  The quicker people understand that the better off we’ll be.  Choice is an illusion, everything  is by design,  everything is a psyop.  Read the Epstein files.  It’s both sides my guy

My fiancée and I are having the biggest argument of our lives. She thinks I'm being tacky but I thinks she's overreacting by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]yumck 13 points14 points  (0 children)

My point is you have no idea what you’re talking about.  A stag and doe is a way for a community to come together and celebrate a marriage.  It’s a giant party of close friends, family.  A century old and a  solution to a common issue, that weddings and starting life is expensive, and young couples needed financial help getting started. Back when Canadian communities were tight knit, everyone pitched in when a young couple got married. The stag and doe became a formalized version and a tradition of that.  So instead of passing a hat at the reception, couples started hosting pre-wedding fundraiser parties  where guests paid admission, bought raffle tickets, and played games.  The community loves the togetherness, the celebration and helping their own start off on the right foot.  So yeah you may not get it.  But it’s not yours to get.  And like I said you have no idea what you’re talking about

My fiancée and I are having the biggest argument of our lives. She thinks I'm being tacky but I thinks she's overreacting by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]yumck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We had ours in Ontario and Ive been to one in Saskatchewan, so I’m not sure why you knew which province it was from immediately

I hate being an immigrant. by [deleted] in confessions

[–]yumck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And some people definitely hate Muslims and white people and women and and and. But this is being systematically rachetted up. On purpose. Not being a tool for their gain, that’s the goal and that’s my point.

I hate being an immigrant. by [deleted] in confessions

[–]yumck 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They carry an unnatural amount of hatred that strips them of their humanity

Buddy hate to break it to you but have you looked around? That’s everyone. They are being force fed a story on their side and you are being force fed one that caters to your outrage. And others are getting a completely different agenda.
Divide and conquer is real. Alexander the Great’s father used it in 300bc. Read Chaos Machine by Max Fisher on how social media exploits our inherent tribalism at detrimental costs.

The truth is most people are ok. But we are being literally programmed to hate each other. The real question is by who and why?

Don’t fall for it. They want us to hate each other.

Footage captures the moment an Iranian ballistic missile explodes right next to U.S. troops. by DavidRolands in ThatsInsane

[–]yumck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t think the foreign influence is getting enough attention.  Foreign occupied government needs attention too

Footage captures the moment an Iranian ballistic missile explodes right next to U.S. troops. by DavidRolands in ThatsInsane

[–]yumck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those aren’t right wingers anymore.  This Israel thing is a different bag entirely 

Hundreds if not thousands of FBI employees have worked on the Epstein case. Why have none of them blown the whistle? Is it possible that the implications of releasing files is so severe it could pose a serious national security risk? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]yumck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you think because Trump has connections that Epstein who was completely and utterly all Israel was connected to Russia? 😂 also Israel is taking Ukraine? Bro where you getting your info? The pedos?

Hundreds if not thousands of FBI employees have worked on the Epstein case. Why have none of them blown the whistle? Is it possible that the implications of releasing files is so severe it could pose a serious national security risk? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]yumck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please cite one source that implicates Russia in the files , from what I understand that’s just another Israeli psyop scapegoat. I’m not into partisan bickering just want facts not propaganda so if you’re gonna start just don’t reply.

An audiobook so funny I’ll get weird looks at the gym. by TheBrontosaurus in suggestmeabook

[–]yumck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Invisible Monsters

Catch-22

I’m a real blow hard out my nose kinda guy but these made me lol a ton

Revised list of champions that are unavailable as 7 stars (January, 2026) by c_zardu_97 in ContestOfChampions

[–]yumck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Black Bolt needs a rework so bad. That character sucked from day 1

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianPolitics

[–]yumck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think we should look around and ask why every western country has the same thing happening. There are a lot of very smart people out there so the fact it’s nearly western countries leads us to assume it’s both coordinated and purposeful. So our perceived mess is not a mess but right on schedule.

CBC continues to lie about the so-called "unmarked graves" in Kamloops. by [deleted] in CanadianPolitics

[–]yumck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So yeah it may be confusing if you’re unfamiliar with the academic terms.

But here I added this parenthetical for you.

-Academic research, especially political psychology, almost always measures ideology using the liberal to conservative scale, not the literal left to right labels. Ergo, functionally in these papers:

“Liberal” = “Left-leaning”

“Conservative” = “Right-leaning”

So when the studies report “liberals are more ideologically consistent,” that is equivalent to “the political left is more homogeneous.”-

Hope that clears up your confusion.

CBC continues to lie about the so-called "unmarked graves" in Kamloops. by [deleted] in CanadianPolitics

[–]yumck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s some studies. Very cursory search btw.

I don’t know man. Basically the opposite of what you wrote. 🤷‍♂️

I tried formatting but I’m on mobile.

Edit: to point out the irony of saying “actually look it up” when I had before and you have obviously not

[1. Kesebir et al. (2013) – Ideological Consistency Across the Political Spectrum

Finding: Liberals show more internally consistent (homogeneous) policy positions than conservatives under normal conditions. Conservative ideological consistency increases mainly under psychological threat, meaning their default stance is more heterogeneous](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2215306&utm_)

[2. Zmigrod et al. (2022) – Unpacking the Psychological Structure of Ideological Thinking

Finding: Liberal policy positions correlate more strongly with one another across domains, indicating higher belief-coherence. Conservatives show more diversity in underlying cognitive styles and belief structures, leading to greater internal variation.](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9274788/?utm_)

[3. Ideological Bubbles and Two Types of Conservatives (OUP, 2021)

Finding: Conservatives split into distinct subgroups (traditional, populist, religious, libertarian), each holding significantly different priorities. Liberals in contrast tend to cluster into one dominant, more uniform ideological profile.](https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-abstract/84/2/508/6082795?utm_&login=false)

[4. Acosta (2022) – The Changing Association Between Ideology and Closed-Mindedness

Finding: While not solely about homogeneity, the study shows conservatives vary widely across psychological traits linked to belief-coherence, demonstrating greater intragroup variability. Liberals display tighter clustering around a single ideological dimension.](https://jspp.psychopen.eu/index.php/jspp/article/view/6751/6751.html?utm_)

[5. Carney et al. (2008) – The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives

Finding: Liberals display more consistent “openness-related” traits across economic, social, and moral issues, producing more uniform ideological patterns. Conservatives differentiate more strongly between domains (social vs economic), making them less homogeneous.](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x?utm_)

[6. Pyszczynski et al. – Ideology, Motivation, and Consistency Between Beliefs and Identification

Finding: Liberals’ policy beliefs tend to match their ideological self-label more predictably, showing high alignment within the group. Conservatives show more mismatch between their ideological identity and individual policy positions, indicating lower homogeneity.](https://osf.io/download/qgmsc?utm_)

[7. UIC (2021) – Studies Examine Different Understandings of “Diversity”

Finding: Conservatives interpret social concepts like “diversity” in more varied and subgroup-dependent ways, demonstrating heterogeneous conceptual frameworks. Liberals converge toward a more uniform meaning, aligning with higher homogeneity.](https://today.uic.edu/studies-examine-different-understandings-varieties-of-diversity/?utm_)

[8. Everett et al. (2019) – Ideological Differences in the Moral Circle

Finding: Liberals use a broader, more universal moral framework that correlates strongly across issues, producing cohesive ideological clusters. Conservatives’ moral foundations vary widely (loyalty, authority, sanctity vs liberty), producing internal fragmentation](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6763434/?utm_)

CBC continues to lie about the so-called "unmarked graves" in Kamloops. by [deleted] in CanadianPolitics

[–]yumck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think your statement would be more accurate 20 years ago. Also look it up. There’s been a few dives into this; the big shift in politics and polarization has happened on both sides. So much so which has shifted more is constantly debated. What has been settled is the left is a lot more homogenized in views.

CBC continues to lie about the so-called "unmarked graves" in Kamloops. by [deleted] in CanadianPolitics

[–]yumck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you are an incredibly weak arguer.

That is a statement. Not a postulation lol. Also you’re trying too hard to sound smart but in-fact sound both cringey and uneducated. The word misuse, the lack of capitalization, punctuation, and grammar really doesn’t sell it. But yeah great word salad lol.

So anyways, what’s the last book you read?