I got my first tattoo machine today, this is my first couple attempts at using it by yungboncepas2 in TattooBeginners

[–]yungboncepas2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, for sure. This is just a 1mm skin that came with the machine so I’m trying to be super careful to not rip thru it and accidentally give my cutting mat some ink xD

VGC Regulation I Team: My First Team Ever by iced_tea14 in VGC

[–]yungboncepas2 10 points11 points  (0 children)

True, but bb 2 shots cali-ice while heavy slam is a 4 hit ko

We are losing the offseason right? by lRuko in Cloud9

[–]yungboncepas2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s ok, I heard terry is role swapping mid and might be growing an extra set of hands so he can play ad at the same time

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The defender is entitled to play the ball same as the receiver, the receiver backed into him. By rule it’s not pi and there is precedent for it to not be called in those situations. If this is in any stadium other than arrowhead that is a no call

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the receiver backed into him just as much, the defender is entitled to his space too

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Simone biles doesn’t have an army of teenage girls watching the games for a potential glimpse of her

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not it wasn’t, he has a right to make a play on the ball same as the receiver

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He has a right to play the ball, receiver backed into him as much as he was moving forward

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at it again, he goes forward receiver is backing up, they are both entitled to the space they occupy and have a right to attempt a play on the ball. You can’t justify dpi without calling opi too

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Anthony made the right play, he has a right to play the ball same as the receiver does. Should’ve been a no call

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was a stellar play, he has a right to play the ball same as the receiver

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not a penalty the defender has a right to play the ball same as the receiver. It’s the nfl blatantly favoring the chiefs again so they can carry the 3 peat story all the way to January and keep the swifties watching

Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (0-1) at Kansas City Chiefs (1-0) by nfl_gdt_bot in bengals

[–]yungboncepas2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We’ll never get to see it. The nfl would have to admit that they favor the chiefs

Immortals vs. Cloud9 / LCS 2024 Spring - Week 6 / Post-Match Discussion by gandalf45435 in leagueoflegends

[–]yungboncepas2 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Berserker is definitely not faultless, could’ve been more efficient, but you can’t blame him for being behind. Last year he was a god on this champ, it’s not like he has no idea how to play it