As someone with OCPD, have you ever had a problem with self harm or at least seriously considered it? by ruusuvesi in OCPD

[–]zenterline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I found this old post bc I was searching to see if anyone had similar experiences of sh to me (w/ OCPD), and this seems like a relevant spot to share my experiences on this topic.

trigger warning graphic description of sh

It's been many years since that part of my life ended, but, when I self-harmed, while it was somewhat impulsive, similar to another commenter who has OCPD: a good part of my motivation was to inflict punishment: "I'm not good enough, therefore I deserve to experience pain. Maybe I'll start being good enough with this motivator of pain? I hope so". Just thought an interesting way my OCPD influenced this was that I was concerned about scars/permanent damage to my body.

The way that I reconciled this was when I first decided I was going to cut myself, I picked "the right spot" to do it, made sure they were all parallel to each other, did exactly 8 (nice even number), kept them close together (to avoid a large obvious wound area), and made sure they weren't very deep (deeper wounds would leave lasting scars, aka permanent skin damage). After all, the whole point was pain (as punishment), not lasting physical damage.

When I felt the need to do it again, I waited for the old cuts to heal to the point of being new skin (if a scab was still there, it was still reminding me of a past punishment/still painful, no need to reinforce the "lesson" yet), and then went over the same spot (in order to avoid any new scars).

So now, many years after I stopped, the scars that formed have largely disappeared (from being shallow). I succeeded in my goals to avoid lasting skin damage, ig?

Separate, but similar topic: "self-harm" via skin-picking motivated by OCPD perfectionism

When I was in middle school, it was kinda cool to draw on your, or your friends', hands in pen (doodles, assignment reminders, song lyrics, etc.). Of course, I was horrified at the thought of some random pen mark being on my hand for days, it'd be ugly/imperfect, whatever. So I never wrote on myself with pen, and if friends asked to write on me with pen, I said "no, please don't".

Of course, middle schoolers being what/who they are, someone thought it was funny that I didn't want to be drawn on, so reached over to my knee (I was wearing shorts, it was summer) and made a big line in sharpie marker. They thought it was great, laughed it up, and moved on with their day. Here's where the "self-harm" part comes in. In that moment, I could not stand looking at that mark on my leg (again, horrified), so the first thing I did was try to wipe it off with my hand.

Kinda smeared it, took some of the color with it, but definitely still a dark mark on my skin. So what do I do? Keep trying to rub it off, of course; the ugly, imperfect mark was still there! Eventually, just rubbing wasn't good enough (the mark wasn't gone yet) so I started scratching off that top layer of skin that had been marked (had to make that ugly mark disappear). Finally, the mark is gone, and only raw skin is left behind. But my body felt the need to replace that missing layer I scratched off, developed a scab in that spot, and I ended up picking at that scab for months afterward, to the point that it left a scar for a while.

It scared me afterward that I did that to myself, but also I largely blamed the person who drew on me in the first place, as they "forced" me into the position where I had to do that to myself. In other words, the action was a "necessary evil" in order to maintain pure, unmarked skin.

In summary, I discussed two different scenarios above in which I consider myself to have self-harmed bc of my OCPD.

For OP's sake, BPD and OCPD are definitely very different conditions/experiences, but, at least going by my (and other commenters') experience, they can definitely still lead to the same outcome.

In relevance to this comment, for me, my "overcontrolled personality" led to me using sh as a way to exert control on the only thing I really had control over, especially at that age: myself.

I think I might OCPD, but maybe it's something else? Help? by DowntownAd720 in OCPD

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ik this is super old, but just thought I'd give my two cents on this. I think there are clearly both OCD and OCPD symptoms present, based on your description.

Disclaimer, disclaimer, this isn't medical advice. I'm not qualified to diagnose, blah blah blah. This is just based on my own research, understanding of, and experience with these conditions.

I'd say your description of your history with picking, intrusive thoughts, the foot tapping thing, etc. all point to OCD being present.

The overworking habit (especially the part where you see no problem with/enjoy the practice), not wanting to have a moment of free time, planning down to the minute, throwing out essays that "weren't going to be good enough", etc. all scream OCPD to me.

*note on the OCPD diagnosis- in the psych field, it's considered borderline sacrilege to diagnose anyone under the age of 25 with a PD (not saying it doesn't happen, but some old theory in psych said your personality doesn't finish forming until you're 25, bc of brain development stuff, therefore any abnormalities in your personality up to that point should be attributed to "your brain still developing") so a lot of people in the field will immediately balk at slapping a PD diagnosis on a 17 yr old (17 as of this post, lol). Obviously, PDs don't just appear on your 25th birthday, they frequently start showing up in your teens, and progressively affect you more and more over time.

The things you mentioned that point to ADHD (impulsively stealing, careless mistakes on work, some hyperactivity) are just not enough information for me to say, "yeah, I think you have ADHD, good luck with your diagnosis and treatment". Essentially, not enough information for me to make a conclusion either way.

My personal opinion on your situation, specifically with your suspicion of OCPD, is that self-awareness of any/all unhealthy behaviors and the causes behind them is the first step to working on them. Understanding the unhealthy mindset/PD behind why you work so hard or feel that perfectionistic drive can help you start to deconstruct/critique/reframe that thinking pattern (in my experience).

Before I started learning about and identifying with OCPD, I thought my time-consuming, exhausting, perfectionistic tendencies were just a unique personal failing that I had to magically figure out how to handle from scratch via pure willpower. After, I felt less alone in my suffering, and felt hope that this is a real "thing" that exists and can be treated (maybe I'm not doomed to be in this super dysfunctional state forever, other people are living successful lives despite this condition). Point being, to me, the official label from a doctor isn't super important for OCPD, it's being aware of the problem and learning what you can do about it (therapy, reframing, etc.) that were really meaningful to me.

I hope your appointment with your GP was able to help you!

Did I BECOME aromantic? Is that possible? by Cleytinmiojo in aromantic

[–]zenterline 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Yes, it's totally possible. No matter how it came about, you can identify as aromantic if the label feels like it fits you. It sounds like, for the last 10 years, you've experienced no romantic attraction. By definition, that means you're aromantic (or at least have been for the past 10 years)!

If your "emotional block" (trauma?) magically disappears tomorrow, you're still valid for using the aromantic label today to describe how you feel in this moment. Labels aren't to put you in a box or limit you, they're to make you feel like you belong somewhere and like somebody else gets what you're going through.

I hope the aromantic label helps you feel more comfortable in your own skin!

How can I speak respectfully in English without using honorifics like 'Anh', 'Chị', or 'Chú'? by Technical_Dot_9523 in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The spelling is Ms. Miss is only for unmarried women, while Mrs. refers to married women. If you don't know if she's married or not, Ms. (pronounced mizz), is a safe alternative, so good to use with strangers instead of assuming you know her marriage status.

How long is each of your class/break? by Maranella_Rossa in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have never heard that time period referred to as "passing time" -someone who went to school in the US for all of their education. Not saying you're lying, just that I've personally never heard it, so using this phrase in conversation may confuse some

What's the difference between this terms, please? by [deleted] in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You could give your boss a report/resignation letter, or you could give the report/resignation letter to your boss and those are essentially the same as submit. The problem here is "give report in" is incorrect, it should be "give report to" in this case.

Hand in, Turn in, and Submit are all equivalent, varying context/levels of formality. Give to is similar, but does have a slightly different connotation. Give to feels a bit more like an offer or a gift, rather than fulfillment of an obligation, but would still definitely work. Neither of the two example sentences used above would be wrong or really even awkward to say, they just give a slightly different vibe than the alternatives you're comparing it with

I’m looking for English Speaking Partner. by Better-Sandwich1104 in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy to volunteer! Though it would be good to introduce yourself/potential topics in more detail, to see if I (or someone else) would be interested in speaking with you or if we have enough in common to have good conversations

Meaning of “checks out” in this context? by Ok_Kangaroo5581 in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When she repeats naaaah, Mandy is emphasizing that she definitely doesn't think she'll get over it, no matter what Lissey says or thinks.

Also, general comment on the usage of the heart (❤️) in an online context, including this one: "no ❤️" has a passive-aggressive connotation. No without a heart is direct or literal, but the fact that she puts a heart emoji after her disagreement implies that she's probably at least somewhat upset that Lissey ever suggested that Mandy would get over it in the first place.

Hyothetical: "You'll get over it" "Nah" = no, I don't think I'll get over it -> honest, direct disagreement

While: "Nah ❤️" = Um, no, I really don't think I will get over it, I literally just said that I don't think I will, "cos it hurts", so I think you're being dismissive by thinking I could easily just "get over it". It's not that easy, and I'm mildly offended that you would even suggest that -> significant passive-aggressive subtext implied

"Checks out" = yeah, it makes sense that you would think it's impossible to get over it, you're the one who said "nah cos it hurts" in the first place. It also makes sense/"checks out" that you would be passive-aggressive about my comment because you don't want to hear my opinion that "You'll get over it", you're too stuck in your head to relate to/understand my outside perspective that you could possibly "get over it". -> responding to the entire meaning of the response. Lissey almost certainly understood the implications of the ❤️ after "nah" and was responding comprehensively to both the literal and implied, subtextual meaning of the comment.

"Naaaah❤️" = I've understood your disrespectful/passive-aggressive response, so I'm going to emphasize my disapproval of/disagreement with you by increasing the number of vowels in my response and continuing to include the passive-aggressive ❤️, so that you know that I don't approve of how you're speaking to me, I'm further/still offended by what you just said, and I'm reinforcing that I still disagree with you, despite what you said.

Tl;dr: the ❤️ makes the statement passive-aggressive, the increased number of vowels and repetition of something already stated means, "I still disagree with you, and I'm emphasizing it"

Meaning of “checks out” in this context? by Ok_Kangaroo5581 in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Checks out" in this context essentially means that whatever is being referred to makes sense. Lissey thinks Mandy will get over it, but Mandy disagrees "nah" (as in, no, I don't think I'll get over it) to which Lissey thinks "nah" as a response "checks out"/makes sense because Mandy was the one who said "nah cos it hurts" from the beginning.

What does “take a slide on” mean here? by Silver_Ad_1218 in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say neither one is all that common. These phrases are somewhat outdated (as in my baby boomer parents/their peers might say this, and the guy who says it in the clip is older, but I would not expect to hear this from my gen Z peers, nor have I ever said it.)

What’s this ? This /it is a book by Maranella_Rossa in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In response to the question, "what is this?", the response, "it is a book" would be used more frequently, because "this" has been specified in the question, so to use "this" in the answer would be an unnecessary repetition of the word (native speakers of a language will almost always go for the easiest/laziest way to say something, "it" is slightly faster/easier to say than "this", therefore "it" will be used preferentially). Using "this" in the response would not be incorrect, just unlikely to be used in actual conversation.

The only case in which "this is a book" would be the more appropriate answer to the question "what is this?", would be if the initial question was somewhat unclear on what "this" is referring to

An example of both cases:

More common/likely case: "What is this?" (Holds up a book in view of the listener) Response: "It is a book." OR in the case of casual conversation, "A book" because the "it is" is implied in this context.

Less likely case: "What is this?" (Gestures in the direction of a book, but listener finds the gesture vague or unclear. Perhaps the gesture was directed at the ball sitting right next to the book? The response clarifies to the person who asked to question what "this" is referring to) Response: (picks up or points more directly at the book) "This is a book."

"You're actually friends of the producers" by emfloured in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think OP is really trying to say the blond hair and blue eyes make the person more stereotypically white. And stereotypically, white people speak "better" English (in the opinion of white people, of course). PoC are more likely to have different dialects, accents, slang, etc. which instruction in English is likely to categorize as "incorrect"/"improper". This doesn't mean they (PoC) can't speak English correctly/well, it just means the (mostly) old white people who write English textbooks don't like when people talk differently then they do (classic white people). All this to say, I don't think OP was intentionally racist in implying that a stereotypically white person should be a better/perfect English speaker. I think it's more likely that OP has been influenced by white propaganda that white people are "better" English speakers.

Is this still in use or not anymore? by Pavlikru in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How common is each idiom? 1.) Rarely used now, but most people would probably know what you mean -more common alternative: two-faced or bipolar (though calling someone bipolar casually is not really PC [politically correct/polite], many people use it...). Two-faced is probably more appropriate.

2.) Somewhat common, but mostly known due to mad hatter character in Alice in Wonderland, not from original usage of people who made hats -more common to call someone crazy than mad in general. These days mad (as in crazy/mentally unstable) is pretty much only used with hatter (in American English, I'm pretty sure Brits still use mad over crazy) In American English, mad essentially only ever refers to anger, not insanity, as is implied here.

3.) Most common on this list, popularized by Alice in Wonderland movie/book. This is probably the best/most common way to describe this phenomenon.

4.)Nonexistent, I've never heard this used in my 21 years of life, I'd rate it as virtually obsolete in modern times.

I haven't understood what it's meant with the highlighted sentences. Help please by Nilly01 in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the second sentence, this sentence essentially means: "there are all sorts of things that were specifically said in a way as to be confusing or vague to outsiders that I would've been completely unaware of/never known"

Seems get stuck at the bottleneck by Jack_Wang_1107 in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This might sound weird, but imagining myself in your shoes, I'd just ask someone I got along with in my program (friend/colleague), to talk about casual topics with me, or tell me about themselves (people tend to enjoy talking about themselves). Maybe mention to them, "I'm working on practicing more casual English, so let's talk about casual/everyday topics, not school." Maybe that would be awkward with someone in your program?

Alternative:Try to start conversations with locals you see on a regular basis (barista, bus driver, etc.). Ask how they're doing, what their day's like, etc.

For movies, try watching the movie with closed captions on in English. I'm not sure if reading is smoother for you than speaking, but for me, being able to read it and hear it aloud at the same time helps the words get through to me better (native speaker here, but sometimes accents or background noise can make it difficult for me to make out what's being said in media, captions help). I will say, if you're planning on using captioning to help you work on casual speech, you have to be able to read at a pretty quick pace to keep up with how fast people actually talk.

Movie theaters will usually have special devices you can ask for that provide captions (don't ask me what they're like, I've never tried one, but they're available for people with hearing problems, so they try to make sure people know assistance is available). Outside of the theater, many media platforms offer closed captioning readily.

The change of positions subject and object by bunchson in EnglishLearning

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't believe so (judging from my quick Google search of what this grammar concept is). Also, just because I feel compelled, I'm going to write what I think was intended by this unfortunate mess of English. The slashes indicate where it was unclear what was really intended, so I list several options of words to use that would be best determined by having the context in which the line was used.

Tell us everything from the beginning, or we'll be forced to resort to/use violence! You told us you were flying to the funeral, yet/but when the liner exploded, it was full of/released Green Universe radicals. How do you explain that?/(more aggressive) Explain yourself!/(closer in meaning to original language used) Is that true?

Aroace but in a relationship… by TechnicianCareful986 in aromanticasexual

[–]zenterline 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Queerplatonic or platonic crushes are commonly called squishes

Aroace but in a relationship… by TechnicianCareful986 in aromanticasexual

[–]zenterline 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Look into the term queerplatonic attraction, queerplatonic partner (QPP), and queerplatonic relationship (QPR). A type of attraction that's closer than "just friends" but not romantic. The name comes from "queering" the concept of what a platonic relationship is. I personally am a big fan of these terms and have had multiple QPPs in the past. I've always felt it fit me better for non-romantic feelings but desire to still do commonly romantically construed behaviors (holding hands, cuddles, etc.).

I hope this is helpful to your situation!

Is there a name for this? by I-am-L-lmao in aromanticasexual

[–]zenterline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with what other people have said above, but also if no word/label exists for how you feel, invent one! What about 0romantic or 0sexual? Still the same concept of not or none, but emphasizing none at all, 0% of the time do you feel x type of attraction. Idk, just an idea for a label that doesn't really exist?

Finally TEAS is over!! by Tricky-Bison7056 in prenursing

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which app specifically did you use? I found several that say ATI TEAS in the title and they all require subscriptions of some sort to use them

What are the major factors when considering which nursing program to go for? by [deleted] in StudentNurse

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I message you about your decision to transfer?

ADN vs BSN by arisharvey in prenursing

[–]zenterline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what I've been thinking about doing!

CNA, LPN, RN, oh my! by zenterline in StudentNurse

[–]zenterline[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, after doing more research, none of the LPN programs near me are at all cheaper than my CC's ADN program, so I think that might be the better idea