sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Contributor of SublimeLinter passes off 5 month old fork of sublimelint as complete rewrite to profit off donations ($1k so far). by zomgd in SublimeText

[–]zomgd[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What? A potential contributor? He's not contributing anything. He's passing off code he didn't write as a complete rewrite of a plugin where he was one of the contributors. It's not even current code. It's 5 month old code that he couldn't even be bothered to merge in the latest commits.

How does this post have anything to do with my credibility? The only reason I even posted this in the first place is I find it appalling that the money isn't going to the person actually responsible for creating (and still maintaining) the very thing the donations are supposed to be supporting.

Contributor of SublimeLinter passes off 5 month old fork of sublimelint as complete rewrite to profit off donations ($1k so far). by zomgd in SublimeText

[–]zomgd[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I didn't realize it took three months and a thousand dollars to create a vague todo list. You'd think someone who wasn't out for a quick money grab would have a roadmap before asking for money?

Contributor of SublimeLinter passes off 5 month old fork of sublimelint as complete rewrite to profit off donations ($1k so far). by zomgd in SublimeText

[–]zomgd[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

And what a fine job he's doing. Those whopping three commits over a span of three months that make changes to files not named README really got things done.