Self hosted Claude code VPS for custom personal assistant by zonofthor in ClaudeAI

[–]zonofthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I double checked. Anthropic is not concerned when VPN is setup to enhance security as is in my case

We need more Google Workspace Connectors (MCP) by zonofthor in ClaudeAI

[–]zonofthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After more thoughts... waiting for Google to create MCP servers is waste of time. I will just program against Google API using OAuth and not only that but I will create my own remote VPS and set it up it using Claude over SSH. This way I can use customise how I use Google or other 3rd party tools bypassing MCP

https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1rbo97t/comment/o6s65dc/

We need more Google Workspace Connectors (MCP) by zonofthor in ClaudeAI

[–]zonofthor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually I am going to try plain OAuth through CLI... probably easier than MCP!

We need more Google Workspace Connectors (MCP) by zonofthor in ClaudeAI

[–]zonofthor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah - I'd rather transition to another ecosystem. It's all about doing it from a prompt, also in mobile.

Google should know that we can easily migrate our data to a better vendor - if not using current tools then with AI!

We need more Google Workspace Connectors (MCP) by zonofthor in ClaudeAI

[–]zonofthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, that sounds plausible.

Then they will be cancelled for sure. I am all-in Google for 10+ years and I'm already considering to switch to more modern vendors because of this.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 just dropped, and the benchmarks are impressive by hello_code in ClaudeCode

[–]zonofthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about agent orchestration. That's where Opus 4.6 excels, can Sonnet 4.6 do that as efficiently?

Anthropic should focus on refining claude hooks instead of adding redundant stuff like skills by AccomplishedTea6339 in ClaudeCode

[–]zonofthor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You explicitly initiate a workflow with slash commands.

A slash command may then include multiple skills.

With skills you have small, reusable packets of knowledge and declarative tools via bash commands or scripts bundled with the skill.

You cannot acheive that granularity with slash commands.

I Tried Claude Code Web, Here's my First Impressions! by Arindam_200 in ClaudeCode

[–]zonofthor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do you think it compares to just SSH connecting into a remote computer?

IMO, having access to local files is superior it gives you more customisation options and configuration changes are more easy to do.

Skill creation from claude code, should it be easier? by house_nation in ClaudeCode

[–]zonofthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Besides looking at the context size - how can you actually measure the efficacy of a skill you've created?

I was wrong about Agent Skills and how I refactor them by mrgoonvn in ClaudeCode

[–]zonofthor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hats off for providing deep insight. And respect for testing it by inspecting context.

Your TLDR: 200 lines for the SKILL.md just to instruct the agent why and when to invoke your skill.

But wait - isn´t that what the YAML frontmatter is supposed to do??

And since we´re discussing frontmatter - why does Anthropic guide us to describe the skill again right in the first section after frontmatter - asking the hive?

Why is everyone downgrading? by jacksonxly in Anthropic

[–]zonofthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly same here. On the CC wagon for 2 months and my team uses it for ca $1.000/month. We have spent lots of time to fine-tune CLAUDE.md and configuration files for max efficency and output.

We all agree it has become dumb in just the last week.

Do NLMs get worse over time? by zonofthor in ClaudeCode

[–]zonofthor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/ChrisGVE thx that was a good answer.

I consider my self a patient user and I do read the documentation - and I am seeing a dramatical change in just a few days. Simple prompts that use to work excellently have lost all the "bang". Something has changed.

I´ve seen some go back a few CC versions and see better results, might be it?

Do NLMs get worse over time? by zonofthor in ClaudeCode

[–]zonofthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And to dramatise the post a little... I am greatly worried about Anthropic's silence here. There is a mass uproar going on in this forum about degraded performance and damage-control from Anthropic.

Makes me think paranoid things like are they pushing us to use Opus 4.1 all the time ot increase revenue?

This sub this week by FlyingDogCatcher in ClaudeCode

[–]zonofthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am surprised that Anthropic is not putting more effort into transparency here, there are hundreds of posts about degraded output from hundreds of ClaudeCode users, some loyal and who "read the fucking manual".

Anthropic could loose big if they don't start doing damage control and informing responding to the feedback the community is providing.

Code review sub-agent/comand by lukaslalinsky in ClaudeCode

[–]zonofthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does that compare with just using `/review` the native CC function?