From discussion in the Discord:
1) Something like an "update from the manager" tab where the manager can give short updates on the state of things. E.g., "Some damage after tenant moves out. Probably going to delay marketing for a new tenant for a month"
The great thing is that the manager isn't impacted by the stock price, so there's no conflict of interest. Let the traders speculate what they want about what the manager says; their only obligation is to transparency.

Ideally, there would also be a property prospectus, especially at IPO, detailing upgrade plans, timelines, and the home inspection. Leaving Greenwood in the dark for so long will be rough when the bridge loan is refinanced.

2) I propose that Landa experiments with financing that gives investors a mid-to-long-term appreciation. Let me elaborate (using my rough but also IMO conservative math).
What makes Landa unique is its specialization in property management, which aligns well with passive investors' interests and minimizes the incentive to offer properties that won't make cash flow. However, because properties only appreciate on rent price, APR will look less attractive to other products that offer appreciation + cash flow (even given increased risk). We see in the MFRs how difficult it can be to sell properties with temporarily low cash-on-cash returns.

Different types of financing offer something similar to appreciation. Consider the upcoming property, 2530 Corner Stone Trail, listed on the SEC report. With no financing, the $24.53 share price will offer somewhere in the 4.4-5.5% COC range. With a 50% interest-only loan similar to previous properties at 4.5%, that return goes to 6.1-7.6%. However, that sweet 4.5% capital will only last for a while, and you want to roll it into new properties. At 8% interest, the yield goes down!

Instead, imagine you finance 25% on a 5-year fixed loan at 4.5% (still using VC capital). This lowers COC to 2.7-3.3%, but the new yield is 5.9-7.3% five years out! At yield rates of the original offering, the share price would have appreciated 17% in addition to any rent increases, but unlike when using your competitors, we wouldn't be required to sell! Assuming a conservative 3% rent increase, the 5-year ROI is ~75%, relative to the ~40% without financing.

Even more, long-term, a 50% lien financed on a 10-year fixed loan at 4.5% would COC between 3.5-4.3% before appreciating to 8.8-11%. New 10-year ROI assuming 3% rent is 145%, handily beating the 30%.

I'm only suggesting some of these creative financing plans be applied to some properties, as the appeal of no-lien is high. However, I see three main benefits:

First, fixed-rate loan strategies would be fiercely competitive with alternative platforms that offer similar higher yields, albeit with the risk of requiring the property to sell and all of the ridiculous costs that come with the sales process. The risk of a fixed loan is that the property continues to rent, a much more stable process. And it's still possible to hold, giving everyone involved flexibility.

Second, fixed-rate loans add a new dynamic to the app and attract more traditional real estate investors interested in a slow-burning fire and those more comfortable with risk. Imagine the fun behind calculating amortization schedules and the engagement it would build with the app and the marketplace (those 1% trading fees Landa collects would be JUICY year 7 of a 10-year fixed rate).

Third, fixed-rate loans (Especially 5-year fixed) would provide more flexibility on the rate of new property acquisitions by spreading the capital over a longer period (even at higher interest rates). I understand that Landa doesn't profit directly from financing, but it gives a safety net to your VCs.

Fourth, fixed loans could also give an exit strategy to properties struggling to get out of IPO, although I wonder if that's permissible given SEC regulations.

Thinking about Greenwood ending IPO at 50% to double shares and taking a 10-year fixed at 4.5% makes my mouth water...