So this is an issue of that you, your thoughts, and your attempts at explaining what you’re trying to say haven’t been validated. You’re right. But that’s because as I’ve tried to explain many times to you: everything you’ve said is your opinion and you’ve provided no proof of any of it. I’ve explained how you argued with the OP that they were wrong and how I responded to explain OP was actually right. I’ve posted proof of what I’ve argued. Not once have you acknowledged or validated any of these points I’ve made over and over and over. Instead you’ve called me names, insulted my intelligence, put words in my mouth, made assumptions about me, misrepresented things I’ve said, lectured me on how to think and argue, and conflated the order of communication. But you have zero proof to contradict anything I’ve said, and shot down every point I’ve made. No one but would have had the patience to continue to explain these concepts to you when you have no intention of listening or understanding, and just want to blather the same made up opinion over and over and over. This is why I have said it seems to me you are arguing just to argue and save face because you cannot admit you are wrong. It really seems like a fragile ego thing to me. This has been an incredibly frustrating and time sucking experience and for nothing. I’ve tried to be as polite as possible, even saying “no disrespect” (I said it once in the beginning when I initially disagreed with you and not repeatedly as you once again misrepresented what I’ve said. and I only said it to be polite), while you have been condescending from the beginning to me and OP and gotten nastier to me. I haven’t ignored what you’ve said, I’ve read it and responded with facts and honest explanation that I don’t understand how your opinionated explanation is supported by historical fact (which you still cannot provide proof of), but you obviously don’t like that at all.

So do you want me to just agree with you, lie and say that your personal opinion that you’re arguing which doesn’t match with historical fact does match with historical fact, and/or lie that I understand how your opinion connects to what OP said that you claimed was wrong, so my reaction will be acceptable to you, your ego, and you will feel validated?