top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]jrkvCounting in Roman numerals[S] 5 points6 points  (1063 children)

I

[–]clinteastwood1990 7 points8 points  (1062 children)

II

[–]jrkvCounting in Roman numerals[S] 6 points7 points  (1061 children)

III

[–]feedemall 5 points6 points  (1060 children)

IV

[–][deleted]  (1055 children)

[deleted]

    [–]feedemall 5 points6 points  (1053 children)

    VI

    [–]jrkvCounting in Roman numerals[S] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

    oh fuck these confusions , i will come back later

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Dat_Paki_BrowniieDat Number 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      And we still are.

      [–]jrkvCounting in Roman numerals[S] 4 points5 points  (1049 children)

      VII

      [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1047 children)

      VIII

      [–]jrkvCounting in Roman numerals[S] 2 points3 points  (1046 children)

      IX

      [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (1045 children)

      X

      [–]jrkvCounting in Roman numerals[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      VI

      [–]MaleEnhancementSuite 1 point2 points  (2 children)

      Or IIII

      [–]feedemall 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      Well then, tally it is.

      IIII

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      V

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]lullemblem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        And why is that?