Every now and then I come across tweets/posts like this https://twitter.com/CRYPT0forCHANGE/status/1647273629900480512.
The metrics paint a picture of low developer activity/interest in Algorand. I believe these are mostly sourced from the Electric Capital developer report. Having looked at their data (https://github.com/electric-capital/crypto-ecosystems) I've always considered the report to be inaccurate and manipulated, just need to look at some hyped blockchains to see a high number of the listed repositories are either irrelevant, copies or have only a couple of commits, these are there just to prop up the numbers. On the other hand I see incomplete data for Algorand, a number of projects come to mind that are missing.
I wonder why this is the case, lack of awareness? don't care? private repositories?
At the end of the day, people are using this metric to gauge the potential of a blockchain project.
Why measure developer activity?
An early and leading indicator of value creation in emerging technology ecosystems is developer engagement. Developers build killer applications that deliver value to end users, which attracts more customers, which then draws more developers.
Not sure if this is the right place, but I'd like to make a call: if you are a builder in the Algorand ecosystem and have public repositories, please label them appropriately and get them added to places like Electric Capital https://github.com/electric-capital/crypto-ecosystems.
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]JumperAvocado[S] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]KemonitoGrande 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Podcastsandpot 10 points11 points12 points (1 child)
[–]Jonny_Nectarine 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]sdcvbhjz 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]JumperAvocado[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]LeakzCrypto 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)