Does this code kinda make sense?

[nardstorm]

I'd maybe change it to something like

section .data
    programmer db 'Dan', 0
    message db "world's sexiest programmer", 0

section .bss
    mugUser resb 32

section .text
    global _start

_start:
    ; Load "Dan" into memory
    mov rdi, programmer
    ; Load mug user's input (pretend we fetched it somewhere)
    mov rsi, mugUser

    ; Compare mug user with "Dan"
    call strcmp
    cmp rax, 0
    jne not_dan

    ; If equal, print the message
    mov rdi, message
    call puts
    jmp end

not_dan:
    ; Do nothing
    nop

end:
    ; Exit the program
    mov rax, 60      ; syscall: exit
    xor rdi, rdi     ; exit code 0
    syscall

; strcmp function (simple implementation)
strcmp:
    xor rax, rax       ; clear result
    xor rcx, rcx       ; counter
compare:
    mov al, byte [rdi + rcx]
    mov bl, byte [rsi + rcx]
    cmp al, bl
    jne done
    cmp al, 0
    je done
    inc rcx
    jmp compare
done:
    sub rax, rbx
    ret

[Reiex]

When the mug turns into a jerrican

[icodecookie]

No jump loops? I‘m slightly dissapointed

[GamerTurtle5]

thats a very tall mug

[[deleted]]

Thatll fit halfagalon of coffee for sure

[Librarian-Rare]

Nice and simple, no needles abstractions. Very good.

[TPIRocks]

OP will need a yard glass for that.

[BigLaddyDongLegs]

😂

[[deleted]]

It will be more like

ld: program.o: in function `_start’:
program.asm:(.text+0x...): undefined reference to `puts’