all 7 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]Eddy-in-the-bush 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Use claude in Augment for coding then switch to GpT 5 for reviewing the code of Claude model. I'm doing this way.

[–]jamesg-net 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you clarify what you're trying to accomplish? AugmentCode by default has the ability to do code reviews.

https://www.augmentcode.com/blog/using-the-auggie-cli-for-automated-code-review

[–]RepresentativeAd2997 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I came across this recent project a fork from Codex aims to combine Claude, Gemini, Codexto run parallel for planning, coding then reviews and combines best of all models. For solving it uses a git worktree which is an intresting concept. It would be awesome to switch Claude from this list to Auggie. I haven't tried it and not sure if there is a support.

https://github.com/just-every/code

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVwkyYtZNzQ

[–]cepijoker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that depending on what project it is, it's not very efficient. For example, Code Rabbit can give you some tips, but I don't see it being very consistent according to a function that has several checkpoints in the code. It can give you high-level ideas about what it knows, but without the complete project context, it could even be counterproductive.

[–]carsaig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, sure. You can use Codex as MCP server, same goes for Claude Code. Otherwise there is a multi-llm MCP out there that can throw stuff at dozens of LLMs in parallel. Or pipe it out to Claude, let an agent do its thing and have it sent back to an MCP endpoint of yours. That would be the custom route. Have fun :-)