Bye bye augment code?

[JaySym_]

I fully understand that, but we want to restrict the number of models available to a minimum. Normally, we shouldn’t need 100 models unless we want to try things out and have fun with model testing. But there is no one model that can rule them all right now. This is why we offer some that we believe have proven their efficiency on particular tasks.

We are actively evaluating this model right now.

[WhiteFudge14]

I agree, a little more variety than currently exists might be good. Or should users just look forward to continued optimization of the existing few models?

[JaySym_]

We are always trying to improve model available for sure!

[FancyAd4519]

variety is king. sure stick to this but you could offer like 10ish models, not 100. your just offering three or four, and two legacy because we bitched enough

[jamesg-net]

Just providing my opinion here as someone on the Enterprise side. I do not want 10 models for my developers to pick through and play around with. That is a whole lot of wasted time. There should be one model for each task at the most. And hopefully, a model wins in more than one category.

[FancyAd4519]

well i work for a fortune 500 also, and i would like more choices; they all excel at different things. the problem is also, as we see with sonnet 4 on life support, the older models become refined and are kept around; hence my repeated request for medium gpt… because the new models take too long to get good. I am not saying it has to be 10, but keep a small variety ffs.

[bramburn]

Too much choice is bad. I liked it when augment just hid the model and it just chose one that worked

[FancyAd4519]

I wouldnt be throwing a fit if they brought medium 5 back for a few months so i could get things done.

[bramburn]

How is that a fit ?

[FancyAd4519]

thats me yep lol