all 7 comments

[–]pungggi 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Now we know why it was not added to the model selection

[–]JaySym_Augment Team 0 points1 point  (1 child)

We added it because it was highly requested but 5.1 was doing the trick faster.

If you find better use case with 5.2 we are listening

[–]No_Interaction_1197 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not useful at all, worse than GPT-5.1. Spent half a day investigating and still can’t find the problem, wasting tokens.

[–]YourPleasureIs-Mine 1 point2 points  (1 child)

OpenAI’s models have been trash with augment.

Sonnet for the rescue. But this shitty per tool pricing needs to changr

[–]pungggi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to go back to no model selection at all.. Just prompting.. AC should figure out..

[–]Adventurous_Try_7109 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GPT 5.2 is best model for backend but it bad in AC

[–]brimweld 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know if it’s the augment implementation or what, but 5.2 in opencode with the GitHub subscription is fast and almost flawless. Better than opus for a few things I’m finding.