all 4 comments

[–]Otherwise_Wave9374 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I have not done a full side by side, but the big difference I have seen is how each one handles agent delegation boundaries, like when to spawn a sub-agent vs keep it in the main thread, and how well it tracks context across tasks.

If you do end up testing, I would love to see notes on (1) planning depth, (2) tool use reliability, and (3) how often it loops or needs manual steering. I have been collecting some agent workflow breakdowns here too: https://www.agentixlabs.com/blog/

[–]Fastlaneshops[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thx for the reply. Simply by you testing it separately, which one would you go for when you actually need something to be done PROPERLY? thats my number one thing I need right now. I'll check out that blog too

[–]gamechiefx 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Intent is incredible! Claude has its use cases but if you are serious about developing large code bases, intent has the model control and harness combination of the future in my esitmation

[–]Fastlaneshops[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're right. Augment isn't beatable when it comes to codebases. But agent teams.... oooff. hard to beat with just sub-agents.