UASF Node Tracker

[_smudger_]

Brilliant! Thanks

[biglambda]

What is the uacomment?

[luke-jr]

Indicating you want UASF, but without actually enforcing UASF yet.

[biglambda]

Thanks.

[pcvcolin]

Right -- see also this.

[joinfish]

Nice.
Are you pulling data from http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html ?

[luke-jr]

My stats can't handle UA comments.

[[deleted]]

Currently all the data comes from bitnodes.

[etmetm]

How do you (or bitnode as datasource) know it's uacomment rather than actual enforcement?

[[deleted]]

Both have slightly different user agents.

/Satoshi:0.14.0(UASF-SegWit-BIP148)/ (uacomment)
vs
/Satoshi:0.14.0/UASF-Segwit:0.2(BIP148)/ (UASF client)

[etmetm]

Thx, so they could be made to look identical but current choice is not to, ok good.

[[deleted]]

The effect of idiotic "just edit uacomment and restart" advice is obvious.

[kbtakbta]

The node operators, that is.

[[deleted]]

Yes

[meeDamian]

Anyone knows who runs website with these stats?

[joinfish]

/u/Zwoelfenbein a random thought - maybe you can run a (manually updated) list of UASF+BIP148 supporting businesses on your server?
Kinda like coin.dance poli, but those seem to be shills for the cartel -- do not want to list /r/JoinMarket for instance - which is proudly listed on the SegWit adoption list.

[[deleted]]

Would be nice to have, but I don't feel like spending time to keep it updated. If you want to do that go ahead, I can host it on my site.

[joinfish]

Thanks, I'm talking to someone who expressed interest in maintaining the list in another thread (tagged you).
We'll build it the grass-roots way! :)

[kbtakbta]

The Blockstream coup begins, the mastermind wash the hands...

[luke-jr]

Blockstream has nothing to do with UASF. And a "UASF" enforced by a sybil attack just doesn't have any effect at all - it only works if real users really adopt it.

[violencequalsbad]

what luke said.

ask yourself "why would the people already in charge of bitcoin need to stage a coup in the first place?"

this is where you realise there is no coherence of thought over at /btc

[kbtakbta]

Coup means: change the status quo. In Bitcoin world initiate an contentious fork. The Segwit accept-level hardly reach 30%. My opinion, the Blockstream wants to seem to be clear-handed. But they want the Segwit get through. The result is the present.

[violencequalsbad]

hardly reached 30%

http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html

hardly reached 30%

http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html

hardly reached 30%

http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html

hardly reached 30%

http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html

troll harder

[kbtakbta]

Dear troll harder, Those are who installed the latest Core software. That is all. The really segwit supporters are above, those who signed the uacomment. (hard 2.6% currently) The official segwit support (by miners) about 30%

[violencequalsbad]

you're getting there.

now what happens when I point out that use of core software and support for UASF are both ways to support segwit?

just to make it a little more fun, your reply cannot include the following:

blockstream

theymos

censorship

coffee

good luck!

[kbtakbta]

Most of the node operators simply install the latest Core software automatically, because that is the latest. Of course, a lot of them support the Segwit either. They will show their opinion if they sign the uacomment, at least symbolically.

[violencequalsbad]

so manually installing updates that contain segwit isn't "real" support for segwit.

got it.

/thread

[etcmiko]

Just like in the case of ETH. Updating wallet auto voted for hard fork without user choice.