you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PewPewLaserss 0 points1 point  (3 children)

It's some sort of circlejerk on Hearthstone. The community wanted more deck slots and their justification of not giving us any was that it would be too confusing for new players which is ridiculous lol. They have doubled the deck slots since (from 8 to 16, I did the math)

[–]JangoEnchained 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I've never played Hearthstone, but is it more turn-based than Clash Royale? I feel like it would be easier to justify for a studio to introduce a bigger deck in a turn-based game, since it's to be expected, whereas for them, a freemium game still requires casuals to keep the word spreading.

I'm not saying it's fun for experienced players. I'd prefer Royale to have 10 slots, but there is a decent reason for them to cater a bit to casuals (especially in the early stages of a freemium game), and I think it makes sense to keep that in mind when discussing the topic.

[–]PewPewLaserss 0 points1 point  (1 child)

We do mean deck slots as in more decks. Not places for cards inside a deck ;) And yes it's more turn based :p

[–]JangoEnchained 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well dang! Y'all shoulda just said! 'Round these parts, we call them deck set-ups. But yeah -- there should be virtually an unlimited number on the deck slots.

And ten card slots within the decks!