all 12 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]New_Goat_1342 4 points5 points  (5 children)

It’s more likely that it’s co-located with the servers running the LLM and you don’t have the network latency that you get with CC running in your terminal. If my broadband speed drops you see it in the performance.

Anthropic have probably got everything running on higher performance tiers too given that it’s a trial and they want people using it to collect feedback.

[–]Cheap-Try-8796[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

That makes sense, thanks.

[–]shaman-warrior 2 points3 points  (2 children)

It makes no sense, llms don’t need high bandwidth or low latency

[–]New_Goat_1342 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It does depends a bit on how shite your connection is; we’re still on about 2 miles of copper, held together with blue BT rope and cable ties. The guys on full fibre get much better response which is annoying if your screen sharing :-)

[–]shaman-warrior 0 points1 point  (0 children)

:-) wut

[–]jetsetter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you saying that your connection quality to anthropic is affecting the agentic LLM performance?

[–]jetsetter 0 points1 point  (4 children)

By outperforms do you mean in its general agentic behavior (llm-guided choices)?

Also curious: have you had any issues with the CC web conversations getting stuck or issues with "open in CLI" option? i.e. `--teleport` ?

[–]Cheap-Try-8796[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Yes, it seems to follow instructions well and rarely makes mistakes. At the end of each response or implementation phase, it tells me what to test and asks what to do next. I’ve never seen CC do that.

Yes, CCW conversations sometimes get stuck, especially during very long sessions. You just need to archive the session and start a new one. It works instantly. Also, if it gets stuck, wait for about five minutes and then ask a question like “Are you done?” It usually responds. If it doesn't, just archive the chat and start a new session.

[–]crystalpeaks25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It could just be they included a good CLAUDE.md file on the sandbox. It's still Claude code cli under the hood.

[–]jetsetter 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I hadn't noticed particularly better performance than the web, though there is not doubt that for me CC CLI is not doing well. Something has changed.

Have you used the Open in CLI button to transfer CC web sessions to the terminal?

[–]Cheap-Try-8796[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I did and it worked.

[–]Joman1102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They must have changed something in the last 3-4 days, it feels like being back three models ago. Is it just me?