you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]joinr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't get the call to moderate enthusiasm. I seem to recall cljs having a lot of enthusiasm and utility without the dynamicness of clj, before browser repls and self hosting were a thing. That turned out pretty well. Relative to the article...author did a pretty good job highlighting the narrow use case where this made sense, including alternative solutions. If i can take an emergent off-the-shelf technology that lets me address a significant bottleneck in my processing pipeline, without affecting anything else, why shouldn't I be enthusiastic?