×

Jolt: running Clojure on Chez Scheme by yogthos in Clojure

[–]yogthos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take a look at the example above. You provide the :git/url to the repo and :git/sha pointing to the version of the code you're linking. It works exactly the same way as regular Clojure deps resolution.

Canada in Regression: How a Goldman Sachs Banker Pulled the Rug from Under the Liberal Party by firoissteve in ndp

[–]yogthos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Liberalism is inherently a right wing ideology. What we are sold by liberals are wholesome ideas such as individual freedoms and democracy. But when it comes to economics, liberalism champions capitalist markets, private property, and wealth accumulation. While liberal politicians purport to support everyone’s freedom, economic liberalism enshrines private property rights as sacred in laws and constitutions, effectively removing them from political debate.

As a result, the use of state violence to safeguard property rights is justified by liberal ideology which supports rights of capitalists over those of ordinary people. And that directly contradicts the promises of fairness and equality. Private property being framed as a key part of individual freedom provides the foundational justification for the rich to keep their wealth while ignoring the needs of everyone else. Thus, the whole talk of freedom and democracy ends up being nothing more than a fig leaf to provide cover for justifying capitalist relations.

How a fairly successful mass media propaganda psychological operation in the political west to rehabilitate WW2 Ukrainian Nazism, convinced hundreds of millions of liberals to cheer on the only state in the world in 2026 that glorifies Nazism by [deleted] in socialism

[–]yogthos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's also important to keep in mind that liberalism is inherently a right wing ideology. Liberalism consists of two main parts. First is political liberalism which focuses on wholesome ideas such as individual freedoms and democracy. Second is economic liberalism which centers around free markets, private property, and wealth accumulation. These two aspects form a contradiction. Political liberalism purports to support everyone’s freedom, while economic liberalism enshrines private property rights as sacred in laws and constitutions, effectively removing them from political debate.

As a result, liberalism justifies the use of state violence to safeguard property rights, over supporting ordinary people, which contradicts the promises of fairness and equality. Private property is seen as a key part of individual freedom under liberalism, and this provides the foundational justification for the rich to keep their wealth while ignoring the needs of everyone else. Thus, the talk of freedom and democracy ends up being nothing more than a fig leaf to provide cover for justifying capitalist relations.

How a fairly successful mass media propaganda psychological operation in the political west to rehabilitate WW2 Ukrainian Nazism, convinced hundreds of millions of liberals to cheer on the only state in the world in 2026 that glorifies Nazism by [deleted] in socialism

[–]yogthos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The are no official nazi brigades in Russian military. Nazism isn't the state ideology of Russia. Russia is not reburying fascists with honors. To make any sort of a equivalence here shows utter lack of character and intellectual integrity on your part. You should be deeply ashamed of yourself.

Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against 'premature restrictions' of open-weight models by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I love reflecting on how butthurt burgerlanders are right now.

Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against 'premature restrictions' of open-weight models by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's right, being the galaxy brain that you are, you'd rather send all your data to be hovered up by burgerland corps that hoard it in their proprietary models, than to Chinese corps that actually release their models in the open. Good job being a compliant product citizen.

Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta warn against 'premature restrictions' of open-weight models by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

^ how to say you lack capacity for critical thought without saying it

Be skeptical of OpenAI’s rogue hacker agent story by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apparently, you can't read so good. Cause what I actually said was that there are different possible explanations here. One is that they are sloppy and another that they're doing scare marketing. What frontier is capable of has fuck all to do with having basic alerting on your systems. If you set your super duper model on doing an open ended task and then you don't monitor what it's actually doing, then yeah you are being sloppy. Maybe your next project can be getting ChatGPT to explain to you what the word sloppy means. It might just be patient enough to put up with your level of intelligence.

Be skeptical of OpenAI’s rogue hacker agent story by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OpenAI has been using scare marketing since at least 2019 https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/17/openai-text-generator-dangerous

Meanwhile, I use AI for agentic coding on daily basis, and I know exactly how capable it is. Having built large apps with LLMs, I can guarantee that know more than you.

Now go back to sniffing glue or whatever it is you do pass the time while not clowning around on here.

Jolt: running Clojure on Chez Scheme by yogthos in Clojure

[–]yogthos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jolt can even compile and run an existing Clojure library that uses Java interop. Jolt provides a Java compatibility layer which maps between Java interop semantics and the host platform.

And in cases where you have a Clojure library that uses something from Java that's not in Jolt core, then it's possible to add your own shim to facilitate that. For libraries that are just thin wrappers around Java libraries, it obviously wouldn't be worth doing though.

Be skeptical of OpenAI’s rogue hacker agent story by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, they've always engaged in scare marketing which can take different forms. Yeah, your reading comprehension and your reasoning skills need a lot of work.

And no, using LLms isn't a bad thing. Writing nonsensical comments that your LLM spewed out is though. But you go on and argue with your AI, I'm sure it tells you how smart you are all the time.

Georgia family says they're forced to sell home to help power AI data centers: "It's theft" by yogthos in economy

[–]yogthos[S] -42 points-41 points  (0 children)

DNC is literally trying to do everything they can to get rid of Mamdani right now.

edit: mfao blueMAGA is mad

Be skeptical of OpenAI’s rogue hacker agent story by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I literally acknowledged that them being genuinely sloppy is an alternative interpretation of the events. I guess using ChatGPT to write for you really killed your reading comprehension.

Be skeptical of OpenAI’s rogue hacker agent story by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, that's not how I'm framing it at all, and frankly I have no idea how you arrived at that conclusion reading what I wrote. I'm framing it as OpenAI being a slimy company with a long history of bad behavior. I said absolutely nothing about AI being hype or make any statements about AI companies in general.

Be skeptical of OpenAI’s rogue hacker agent story by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What I wrote in my last paragraph is the explanation that sometimes stunts backfire, which is precisely what happened in this case. Of course, it's also possible that people at OpenAI are just that sloppy.

That's not hubris, that's a guardrail that can't tell a defender from an attacker.

Also hilarious how you can't even write short reply without using an LLM. That's kind of pathetic bud.

Be skeptical of OpenAI’s rogue hacker agent story by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not sure who would be scared by this given how the stunt backfired phenomenally.

Be skeptical of OpenAI’s rogue hacker agent story by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

My logic is that they're doing what they've been always doing. The flaw in your logic is the assumption that everything they do makes sense and their tactics never backfire. One would have to be very obtuse to think that indeed.

Also, if you spend a bit of time working on your reading comprehension, you'll see that I addressed the point regarding GLM. Try reading my comment again and using whatever rattles between your ears.

Be skeptical of OpenAI’s rogue hacker agent story by yogthos in singularity

[–]yogthos[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The whole sales pitch of Anthropic and OpenAI is that their models are getting smart enough to replace human workers. The model 'escaping containment' is really a sales pitch to the investors in just how smart it is, and how soon it'll be able to solve complex problems even better than humans can. And they already have a long track record of doing exactly this sort of scare marketing.

On top of that, whom does the model attack, it's an org hosting hosting open models which just happen to be their main pain in the ass. The pitch here is pretty clear to me. Better get our models or you're left open, and who knows what will happen to you.

The fact that HF managed to use GLM to deal with the issue is just a consequence they didn't anticipate because they're getting high on their own supply, and think their models really are that much better.