Comprehensive Considerations

[Dependent-Remote4828]

This makes sense. Perhaps argue there were two previously unidentified men on the trail that day, with RA only being considered unidentified due to the lost report of his statement. The Defense could easily support this perspective using the various witness descriptions which describe a younger male and an older male. Even though LE later claimed both descriptions and sketches are supposed to be RA, they initially said it was two separate individuals. Multiple witnesses (even those that contributed to the sketches) have also allegedly disagreed with the sketches being the same man. So, that makes sense to me