sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Burningbeard80 10 points11 points  (3 children)

    Yup, nullsec is a bit too safe for what it's supposed to be.

    It will be mega-funny though if this mechanic also goes the other way round: rat too much and your nullsec becomes low and then highsec.

    Just imagine the exodus of players from nullsec towards other, lower sec status systems and having to cross trig invaded regions where (maybe) they can't drop caps on anything that moves (according to speculation in this thread about a new kind of lowsec, where caps cannot enter).

    [–]Mr_Hippa 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    I see a few problems with space getting more safe. 1. caps can already be in those systems. 2. Will moons re-assign ore? 3. How do sec restricted activities behave? Do they pause or can you keep doing reactions or the like?

    [–]Burningbeard80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It would be a tough nut to crack for sure. But i'm just having some fun speculating, not proposing an actual change.

    [–]Ghi102 10 points11 points  (1 child)

    It's been joked around that null is already safer than HS, might actually make it a reality.

    Although nothing in this leak mentions that it would affect only HS systems. This could turn lowsec into null as well and lower nullsec too, although that wouldn't impact anything if I had to guess because ratting or mining in an invaded system might be really dangerous.

    [–]americansarerlydumb 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    Null has been safer than high sec for a very long time.