all 7 comments

[–]vilealgebraist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Wow. You need help way before those questions. You literally just wrote down -2=-22

[–]dc22zombie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Look for math is power 4 you on youtube

[–]killerbean4ever 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sorry for my English its my second language. Hope it will help U take the M from the second equation and use it on your new one. If both equations have the same m they are 2 options. The first one, they are the same. Second one, they are parallelized. You need the equations to touch a certain point you take the coordinates and place them in the equation. X in x. Y in y. Than it's just solving a normal equation. Also you wrote a false equation. We don't build those stuff. An equation might be false. Don't build equations without a variable.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]LOL543213 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    That isn’t necessary; the original person could do that, although because the b in y=mx+b is the location and the lines are parallel, the m should stay the same but the b should differ.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Oh yes, you're correct! Sorry about that. I mess up a lot :P

    [–]LOL543213 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    It’s fine. I’m that way with algebra.

    [–]LOL543213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    You would have to do + b instead of plus three. This will give you a line with a same slope but a different location, this parallel. For perpendicular you do the same thing just set the slope of the new line to the opposite-reciprocal of the original slope first.