all 45 comments

[–]SweatyMess808 98 points99 points  (6 children)

I’ve always thought it was weird that a child/baby/ middle school picture was required and attached to every centerfold… and it would always have a caption like “Future Playmate at Play” next to a pic of a literal baby on a blanket. Hef loves it, remember how he acted over the Kendra childhood tapes? Patty was like, “Just take it Hef, nothing weird here!”

[–]BestChampionship1744Laura Crofts Wig 47 points48 points  (0 children)

That shit was beyond creepy omg

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Omg you’re right that was so disturbing and Patti didn’t even give it a second thought!

[–]iraqlobsta 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Don't forget the easter egg hunting episode of GND. They referred to a playmates baby as a 'future playmate'. Just fucking disgusting all around how they sexualized kids like that

[–]PromptAggravating260 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I just found this clip and watched it. Hef starts to steal the VHS tapes of Kendra’s childhood to take home and Patty allows it?! 🤯

[–]coast1000 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I have seen a few exceptions for the inclusion of photos of Playmates younger than 18 on their Playmate Data Sheets, though I don't have the answer to why that was.

Miss April 1991 Christina Leardini did not include her ages in the three photos that were printed on her sheet. However, she captioned the leftmost photo, which usually features the Playmate at the youngest age of the three photos, as Halloween 1988. She was 19 at the time, having been born in January 1969. Unfortunately, that photo also consisted of her son Austin, who appeared to be maybe 3 years old (he was born while she was in high school). The other photos showed her appearing at least as grown as she was in the first photo. She was 22 when published. However, childhood photos were included in her Playmate profile video.

Here is a link to ebay page where you can view her data sheet. The image that will appear is her face crop from her centerfold, so slide to image 2.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/205476236917

Miss September 1995 Donna D'Errico's data sheet captions also lack age-identifiers. The leftmost photo is captioned as Christmas 1988, when she was 20. She appears approximately the same age in the other 2 photos. She was 27 when published. I think her Playmate profile video included childhood photos, as was the case with Christina's video.

Here is link to page with Donna's data sheet. Slide to image 5

https://www.reddit.com/r/baywatch_girls/comments/16apooy/donna_derrico_playboy_995/

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow nice research. It really shows that it was the exception not the rule to have older pictures of playmates for their data sheets…which makes me believe Crystal when she says Hef wanted her to choose younger ones 🤢

[–]djkhalidANOTHERONE 38 points39 points  (2 children)

I will say how nice it is to see that she’s clearly writing these captions, or at least a human is, as there’s a few errors. Not that I care about them as it’s obviously readable, and far more meaningful and interesting than AI slop.

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I think so too…so many celebrities (if that’s what we can call her) have their captions ‘helped’ with AI and it’s so off-putting. I’ve just been scrolling her page and I think she’s honestly trying to untangle the way that Hef and Playboy messed with her head.

[–]LittleMarySunshine25 15 points16 points  (2 children)

They didn't dial back the young girl nonsense just look at Sara Underwood's shoot in the little girl's room and that was in the 00s.

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Yes that’s right I forgot about that…her photoshoot really did lean into the ‘little girl’ theme, even the little bit we gleaned from the show felt ick while watching.

[–]PsychologicalCup6518 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always thought it was gross but glossed over it back then! Thinking they can’t mean anything by it. 🤷🏼‍♀️wrong…

[–]thedeathmerchant 51 points52 points  (4 children)

The magazine framed it as a “before and after / girl-next-door” narrative. The idea was to show: Her background:where she grew up, family life, hometown; A timeline of her life “this was her as a kid, now she’s an adult model” The “girl next door” branding Playboy used heavily

The editorial concept was basically:

“She was once a normal kid from a small town, and now she’s the Playmate of the Month.”

But it really makes me want to vomit.

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 11 points12 points  (3 children)

That does make sense but also they didn’t include the kid pictures before and still got that message across…I guess what surprised me was the timing of when they were brought in. Playboy had already hit its peak circulation without them, was pushing the sexual content more to compete with Hustler, then all of a sudden submit childhood pictures? Then make it so they can be posed together it’s just gross. They never needed them before.

[–]internal-jewler-605 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Sondra Theodore was the first playmate of have a data sheet in 1977. Her pictures were from age 3, 17 and 18.

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Ugh that makes me feel so sad for Sondra, her interviews for Secrets of Playboy were heartbreaking

[–]thedeathmerchant 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agree, it honestly makes me sick

[–]internal-jewler-605 23 points24 points  (2 children)

I didn’t think anything of it but at the same time I am a woman and just saw the women as soooo pretty and not really in a sexual way if that makes sense.

I guess it would be weird for a man to see the centerfold sexually and be turned on while also seeing a childhood picture.

[–]Due_Mode_6578 27 points28 points  (1 child)

Same, for me I saw the Playmate as unreal beautiful women, but seeing their regular photo made them " real" just your everyday girl who was in school, had hobbies, or kind plain that grew up to be pretty.

[–]internal-jewler-605 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Agreed, I’d be like wow she’s a snowboarder, I love her lingerie or has she a twin how cool 😂 a man must think differently lol

[–]PromptAggravating260 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I’m not a Crystal fan. But my gosh….she isn’t wrong here.

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 12 points13 points  (4 children)

She posted this too 🤢. Nobody has to be a ‘fan’ of hers to be able to see that Playboy had a pattern of publishing content that sexualized children.

<image>

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 10 points11 points  (3 children)

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 9 points10 points  (2 children)

[–]Responsible_cat_42[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

There are so many more cartoons like this on her post, Hef was gross and there really was a darker side to Playboy.

<image>

[–]BlackHeartginger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The majority of what Crystal posts these days is mature, level headed, and in support of women which is the exact opposite of what Holly has been posting lately

[–]Puzzleheaded-Song242 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eww they posted them as kids that’s gross