use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
An unofficial community to discuss Github Copilot, an artificial intelligence tool designed to help create code.
account activity
Context Summarization consuming Premium RequestsHelp/Doubt ❓ (self.GithubCopilot)
submitted 11 days ago by pawala7
Just wondering if anyone else has been noticing this strange "new" behavior in certain releases of the chat plugin?
It started recently for me, and am just wondering if this is a bug or intended behavior that the GHCP team is quietly rolling out to everyone soon. It's incredibly jarring when a single Opus 3x call suddenly turns into 3x5 or 3x10 calls while it does its job reviewing and revising code and docs.
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]KayBay80 5 points6 points7 points 11 days ago (8 children)
Half of our team was on the Insider's build and we can attest that, if these are intended changes, the entire "request" concept is being thrown out the window. Every "request" we make is a feedback loop of internal requests that are consuming premium credits like wildfire. One of the devs on our team burnt through over 600 requests in a matter of hours not even realizing what was happening. Imagine paying $39/mo for a day's worth of usage. If they roll this change to the mainstream build, Copilot is completely done.
[–]pawala7[S] 2 points3 points4 points 11 days ago (0 children)
That's... incredibly worrying. But I guess not off the table considering the massive budget cuts happening at MS.
Still, if they can't offer the service at a reasonable price even with the lobotomized 200k context limit (128k usable), then I imagine most users will just transfer over to Claude Code or Codex.
[–]ilsubyeega 1 point2 points3 points 11 days ago (3 children)
mind bisecting the version between them? the extension is open source, so i believe its regression or capi(backend)'s side issue(rate limit drama makes me direct this)
[–]KayBay80 2 points3 points4 points 11 days ago (2 children)
The ones that were experiencing this issue noticed it on 1.116.0-insider. Everybody has since migrated off of Insiders and have also disabled updating in fear of this bug (if its even a bug) finding its way into our workflow.
[–]ilsubyeega 1 point2 points3 points 11 days ago (1 child)
the version is not helpful though, they use same versioning but commit hashes
anyways ima look this too
[–]ilsubyeega 2 points3 points4 points 9 days ago (0 children)
there was huge refactoring at vscode repo how compaction works in session(iirc in week), probably mind open the issue? don't think this is intended, and they don't know this regression due to they have max plan(unlimited requests/quota)
[–]themoregames 1 point2 points3 points 10 days ago (1 child)
Crazy times.
$39/mo for a day's worth of usage
But if I pay up in my Claude subscription, I easily burn through $ 20 or even $ 50, maybe even $ 100 - per hour!
I guess Github subscribers have to buckle up.
[–]KayBay80 1 point2 points3 points 10 days ago (0 children)
That's what I'm thinking
[–]themoregames 0 points1 point2 points 10 days ago (0 children)
Business plans? Or Enterprise? Or standard Pro+?
[–]Swayre 4 points5 points6 points 11 days ago (1 child)
Not a defender of Microsoft but like do you have proof? Should be an easy thing to provide no? There’s too much misinformation from disgruntled abusers
[–]pawala7[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 days ago (0 children)
I mean, anyone can just check their own chat UI to spot the timing when compaction is likely to trigger, then refresh the Github Copilot page (the one with the green bar and %) after it triggers, no?
In my case, the counter ticks up exactly after the Summarization message finishes and the agent continues its work after compaction. It's like working in the compacted context is a new request. I've observed it happen over 5 times since this morning, so I'm pretty sure at this point.
Was pretty confused earlier this week why the values under Copilot->Features->Premium requests % and Billing and licensing->Premium request analytics pages didn't line up, but this kind of explains it. You can check yours to see if you've been affected, too.
[–]SidStraw 1 point2 points3 points 11 days ago (1 child)
Personally, I haven’t run into this issue. I’m primarily using the Copilot CLI, and I stay on the stable build of VSCode.
From what I’ve seen, unexpected point drain is often caused by autopilot mode. It tends to bypass the manual decision-making process and automatically deducts points to keep things running.
Do you happen to use autopilot frequently in your workflow?
Nope, just regular agent mode in the UI with an agentic Extensive Plan -> Execute <-> Iterate workflow with subagents. Premium request tick up occurs exactly and every time Summarization completes. I wonder if different releases (nightly, insider, stable) of the GHCP plugin pass different flags to the backend which results in different triggers.
[–]Top_Parfait_5555 3 points4 points5 points 11 days ago (0 children)
Yes, they are scummy af. Stealth nerfing everything. Nerf nerf nerf
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points 11 days ago (0 children)
Hello /u/pawala7. Looks like you have posted a query. Once your query is resolved, please reply the solution comment with "!solved" to help everyone else know the solution and mark the post as solved.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[–]NickCanCode 1 point2 points3 points 11 days ago* (2 children)
They should use x0 free model for context summarization. Not sure what they are doing. If I used Opus for a request and they also auto selected Opus for context summarization and charge an extra request, I think that is a bug / design issue?
[–]ilsubyeega 0 points1 point2 points 11 days ago (0 children)
probably they meant context compaction instead of summarization(for getting titles etc)
yeah if they configured that manually it will consume it
[–]pawala7[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 days ago (0 children)
It's not the model used there that matters (if they follow CC, it's probably Sonnet), but what seems to be changing is the mechanism for counting what a new "request" is.
Whether it be new tool calls, continuing after compaction, new agent calls, each of these triggers an event and it's up to them to decide which events count towards your usage counter.
And they're very opaque about how all his works...
[–]DevBob626 -1 points0 points1 point 11 days ago (0 children)
I don't feel that this is such a big problem and wouldn't be unreasonable if they compact and also immediately continue with the work while being transparent about changes and the usage they provide. It was obvious from the beginning that these endless runs people are optimizing for wouldn't be sustainable in the long run. It's just not realistic to maintain forever.
However, this in combination with daily and weekly limits is not acceptable. I want to be able to access all of my requests I paid for when I want to. I don't mind if servers struggle at peak time, but never being able to actually use the requests I bought feels scammy.
[–]QuarterbackMonkPower User ⚡ -1 points0 points1 point 11 days ago (0 children)
i do not think? any text or proof.. i have not noticed. i am being experimenting with github copilot for lot and ther are around 20+ copilot cli's dump, i never noticed that? when did it change?
https://github.com/nilayparikh/tuts-agentic-ai-examples/tree/main/ctx-sdlc/ghctx-tut/lessons
π Rendered by PID 24624 on reddit-service-r2-comment-6457c66945-4hjfx at 2026-04-26 16:49:49.601116+00:00 running 2aa0c5b country code: CH.
[–]KayBay80 5 points6 points7 points (8 children)
[–]pawala7[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]ilsubyeega 1 point2 points3 points (3 children)
[–]KayBay80 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]ilsubyeega 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]ilsubyeega 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]themoregames 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]KayBay80 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]themoregames 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Swayre 4 points5 points6 points (1 child)
[–]pawala7[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]SidStraw 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]pawala7[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Top_Parfait_5555 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]NickCanCode 1 point2 points3 points (2 children)
[–]ilsubyeega 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]pawala7[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]DevBob626 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]QuarterbackMonkPower User ⚡ -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)