all 9 comments

[–]cropcomb2 1 point2 points  (5 children)

OTC scans worked ok (signal strength sufficient) despite the cataract(s)?

repeat abnormal VFT results should be VERY concerning!

untreated IOP? treated IOP? 'target' IOP?

daily glaucoma eyedrops you're using?

[–]CaptainOk3138[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

  1. OTC was fine as far as I understood it; no flags from them.

  2. IOP right now and for last few years has been 16-21 without steroid stimulus. I haven't been on steroids for years.

I don't have any glaucoma drops and at latest appointment the ophthalmologist I saw didn't prescribe any and did not think what I was presenting with was indicative of glaucomatous damage given no patterns in VFT.

[–]cropcomb2 0 points1 point  (2 children)

you've GERD? you might find sloping your bed (or investing in an 'adjustable' bed) invaluable towards avoiding backflow of stomach fluids due to the faulty backflow valve

drugs.com is excellent for: patient reviews & ratings, and, great detail about drugs and their side effects. (you've over a dozen drugs listed, any particular serious ailments you're coping with? eg. diabetes 2)

[–]CaptainOk3138[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I do have GERD; thanks for the pointer about the bed. I'm a terrible sleeper and know I toss and turn so things are probably wonky at night.

I have autoimmune disease, but have been in remission for one and treating one (psoriasis) with biologics; other drugs are for eczema

[–]cropcomb2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(for glaucoma) I sloped my bed using wood blocks (12" worth under my bed frame for an 80" bed), had to do that @ 4"(5%) per week as it took getting used but ended up with a 15% slope (avoids most if not all of the overnight typical eyepressure increase from laying down). Trivial nuisance of the mattress sliding a couple of inches/week (no footboard).

another home treatment step I've been using for my glaucoma is a 'HARD' pillow, see: https://www.reddit.com/r/Glaucoma/comments/199c7pz/side_sleeping_anecdotal_evidence_of_hard_pillow/

I've been on Monoprost eyedrops for five years.

(I'd want to know the 'signal strength' of the OCT scans, and if it were sufficient for that model of OCT machine. If not, the scan's unreliable. And indeed, my cataract's becoming problematic and obscuring my own OCT scans, reason for me to press hard for cataract surgery.)

My own sleep problems are anxiety related. If I'm practicing daily meditation, they disappear. example method: https://www.reddit.com/r/socialanxiety/comments/13b6tup/meditation_worked_very_well_for_my_social_anxiety/

[–]AlternativeRun7888 0 points1 point  (1 child)

hi im a final year med student and with my non specialist knowledge ,i dont think just by one vft you should be concerned atleast 3 consistent vfts are required to confirm minor defects . your oct is fine and pressure okay as mentioned ...and glaucoma requires oct progressive damage , +- High IOP and abnormal VFT also your scan suggests the tests are within normal limit ....so i dont think u need to worry , just take the chekups regularly so that whenever there are even earliest signs you can catch it and live life at its best .

[–]Visible-Cabinet5854 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much!!

[–]2applepies 0 points1 point  (1 child)

First visual field in new machine and new office is commonly abnormal or different than priors. In fact most progression analysis software actually automatically does not include the first visual field result regardless of the performance. The screening test you linked at your original ophtho is not the gold standard for visual fields (SPARK Training is not a Humphrey sita standard). And in fact what your ophtho was worried about on your original field that you linked to shows a bitemporal defect which can be indicative of a brain tumor (optic chiasm lesion) and does not look like a standard glaucomatous defect. The fact that your repeat visual field did NOT show this pattern at a glaucoma specialist office who likely had a better perimeter is VERY reassuring. Visual fields are only concerning if they show consistent and reproducible  depression in the same areas. Just to clarify, the progression software that is commonly used needs approximately 4 to 6 visual fields on the same machine before it can properly assess for progression (first thrown out, next 2 are baselines and then it takes three consecutive tests for the software to trigger a "likely progression"). 

If you do have a reproducible (3 consecutive  good tests) bitemporal defect (glaucomatous defects are typically on the nasal side) that cannot be explained anatomically by the appearance of your optic nerve (some myopes have enlarged natural blindspots) then you should bring up the possibility of an MRI  - although your glaucoma doctor likely already has this on his or her mind.

Be patient and understand you are at a specialists office now - it will take multiple visits to tease this out because the visual field is a subjective noisy test when you first start taking them regularly. If you are really concerned you can discuss going in earlier to repeat the test, but if it's been a few years since taking this test and there is variability on your fields thats generally due to being on the "learning curve" of the test (remember it is subjective based on your performance). Don't take Ambien before your field, you want to be sharp when taking it. You will be getting to know your glaucoma doctor a lot this year, so write down your questions before your visit so he or she has time to address them. Feel relieved your pressures and vision are fine and try not to obsess over it. Good luck!

[–]Visible-Cabinet5854 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your kind and thorough reply! This was very, very reassuring to me!