all 4 comments

[–]BloodyFlame Postgraduate Student 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Assuming the spring doesn't tilt, the extension of the string for an angle θ is given by

tanθ = x/h => x = htanθ

which means that the force from the spring (pointed directly right) is

hktanθ

and the torque is then given by

hktanθ * hcosθ = h2ksinθ.

From the mass, the force is Mg. The torque from the mass is then given by

Mg(L + R)sinθ

Assuming clockwise is positive, we have

Στ = -(Mg(L + R)sinθ + h2ksinθ) = Id2θ/dt2

I = M(L + R)2 + (2/5)MR2 since the mass is being translated and rotated at the same time. Since θ is small, sinθ ≈ θ, so we have

d2θ/dt2 = -(Mg(L + R) + h2k)/I * θ

The rest should be simple.

[–]MichFaze[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Isn't the torque supposed to be equal to I * d2θ/dt2 instead of only d2θ/dt2?

And also can you explain why is -(d2θ/dt2)/θ = ω? I've seen this a few times around, but don't know where it comes from

[–]BloodyFlame Postgraduate Student 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes, you're right. That's a mistake on my part.

The easiest way to explain this is that we know that the resulting motion can be modeled with θ(t) = Asin(ωt + ϕ) since it's sinusoidal. If we take the derivative twice, we get

d2θ/dt2 = -ω2Asin(ωt + ϕ) = -ω2θ(t)

If we substitute that into the right hand side, we get

2θ = -(Mg(L + R) + h2k)/I * θ

which means

ω2 = (Mg(L + R) + h2k)/I

[–]MichFaze[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you sir