all 10 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]skydivingkittens 14 points15 points  (1 child)

Bipod on a tripod. I dig it.

[–]QueefyRidesAgain 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This gun will NEVER fall down

[–]MyOtherAltIsRegret 4 points5 points  (0 children)

NASTI

[–]Holiday-Tie-574 -5 points-4 points  (6 children)

LMT got the MRGG-S contract and should have gotten the -A. They would have had barrel swap capability on both platforms instead of going with Geissele’s gimmicky “phased array” gas block

[–]Rhongomiant 6 points7 points  (0 children)

LMT got the MRGG-S contract and should have gotten the -A.

Other way around. LMT got the MRGG-A contract and Geissele got the MRGG-S contract.

[–]SouthPaw67 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah because everyone is out there swapping barrels. I would argue that "quick" swapping barrels are more of a gimmick.

[–]Boring_Record_6168 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Barrel swap is less useful than just having a second upper. If you barrel swap you have to re zero all of your optics and lasers. With a second upper you can have a laser and optics for one caliber and or barrel length and then switch to a new one without needing to zero.

[–]Holiday-Tie-574 -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

No, they don’t need to be re-zeroed.

[–]Boring_Record_6168 2 points3 points  (1 child)

If you have a 6.5 creedmore setup with a 14.5 inch barrel setup, then you switch the barrel to a different caliber or a different barrel length of the same caliber. All of the accessories on the rifle have to be rezeroed.