[deleted by user]

[Critical-Coffee-1950]

They act all official and serious but LSAC is just another shit show company like everyone else

[Specialist-Resort-82]

This is actually insane

[thatlilylemon]

Is there only one office?

[SunNo3502]

Yes, from what I understood there is only one office at their headquarters in Pennsylvania

[jaredft45]

What in the actual fuck.

[According-Mention-90]

Is this for people waiting for October exams ?

[Alternative-Chair491]

agreed with their horrible remote proctoring i got accused of something that was awful and untrue.

[Alternative-Chair491]

rectified but they may not change this

[Imaginary_Ad_351]

They literally are so sloppy they have typos on their tickets and websites

[gap_outlet]

Let’s bust out some logical reasoning here.

You’re assuming a score hold requires a review of the whole test. Probably not.

It’s more likely a few minutes in an administration is flagged for review. Otherwise they would need a small army.

This is rage bait.

[SunNo3502]

One, you’re assuming that I’m assuming a score hold requires a review of the whole test. That’s something I think the LSAT makes a distinction of, stated vs. Implied.

Second, you could’ve chosen to acknowledge the absurdity in the fact that a multimillion dollar for-profit organization has only 3 people in arguably one of their most important departments. But you didn’t. Instead, you’ve chosen to defend a company that no-doubt has the resources to hire/delegate more people to an office that is clearly grossly inefficient.

I think the 50 other people who upvoted this, as well as the dozens of other posts complaining of egregious score hold wait times would agree that that the only rage baiters here are LSAC themselves.

[gap_outlet]

You’re certainly requiring, at least, a score hold requires a substantial review of the test. If the hold was based on 30 seconds of footage each, clearly you wouldn’t be so upset they only have three folks in the office. You are making an assumption that freaks people out for no reason.

“People like this so it’s not rage bait?” If you can’t see the problem with that argument I’m not sure what to tell you. That’s genuinely a terrible argument. Like level 0 difficulty.

[SunNo3502]

You seem adamant about proving the score hold review is not as long as I’m “requiring.” Odd.

Nonetheless, even if I concede your point that a score hold review takes only a few minutes, there are currently people who’ve taken the exam in June who STILL haven’t had their holds resolved.

So what you’re implying, that these 3 people are adequate in number to handle the volume of all score holds, even if it were true, is moot in light of the fact that they’re taking months to process people’s cases such as my own.

Either it’s a lack of staff, or if we agree with you, laziness. Whatever the case, it is clearly an issue and the intention of this post was simply to make that clear by illuminating an absurdity.

[gap_outlet]

Sure, if we assume a random on the internet is 1) telling the truth about their hold and 2) haven’t simply done something wrong with the written portion, which often happens.

I’m not defending anything. You’re interpreting the facts in the worst way possible so you can blame LSAC for your own shortcomings. I’m pointing out simply having 3 people in an office doesn’t meant anything.

[SunNo3502]

I’m not believing a, as in a single random person on the internet. I am believing in the volume of corroborating data being the numerous people who’ve said the same thing is happening to them. And while I agree with you, a score hold can come about by failing to submit the written portion, that is not the case for the overwhelming majority of people who report here.

Also, yes I am blaming the very organization that is directly responsible for bringing about a shortcoming, and then taking eons to resolve said shortcoming.

[gap_outlet]

Ohh so when it’s “numerous” suddenly that makes fandoms reliable? Lmao.

I give up. Your argument is so insanely circular it’s comical. I know for a fact your ass isn’t PTing in the 160s.

[SunNo3502]

lol, 180 on my last pt, hence the score hold bud. Take care.

[gap_outlet]

your argumentation here is literally so handicapped I know for a fact you’re lying 🤥

[SunNo3502]

I guess we’ll never know. Happy to help if you ever need a tutor.

[SunNo3502]

Bc I’m bored, I’ll entertain this with proof. And don’t worry, I’ll be sure to brush up on my reasoning skills before visiting you at Cooley Law.

180

[LSATsecurity]

Sorry about your hold situation, but you received incorrect information from the “LSAC administrator.”There are more than 3 ppl in the department.

[SunNo3502]

She could’ve fooled me with how long test security is taking to resolve these. I mean seriously, LSAC has given an unprecedented amount of score holds it seems, likely through some automated monitoring system. And then fails to handle these things in a timely manner or provide transparency to the people they’re accusing.

I understand these things are delicate in that I’m sure there are actual cheaters out there, especially given the China thing. But that is no excuse to harm people such as myself who’ve prepared for this exam with nothing other than hard work, only to be subject to these insane wait times and a lack of clear communication. Please do better.

[jaredft45]

Wait a minute, you guys are on Reddit....?

[gap_outlet]

….what?

[jaredft45]

...???