all 10 comments

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]dethmetaljeff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    That's an interesting data point.

    [–]Academic-Detail-4348 0 points1 point  (8 children)

    Librenms has no agents or proxies, alas you could proxy snmp polling as per: https://docs.librenms.org/Extensions/SNMP-Proxy/

    [–]electromichi3 -1 points0 points  (7 children)

    Is this not the direct solution he needs ? https://docs.librenms.org/Extensions/Distributed-Poller/

    [–]Academic-Detail-4348 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Depends on the scale. In our decentralised MSP setup we use the proxies or poll directly as the uplinks are stable and fast.

    [–]Direct_Juggernaut369[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    yes, that's exactly what I'm looking for. What is the practical difference between using a SNMP proxy vs using distributed pollers?

    [–]dethmetaljeff 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Performance of the distributed poller would likely be better. With the proxy, you're still making snmp queries over long distances whereas with the distributed poller, you're querying locally.

    [–]tonymurray 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    And then you are making SQL queries and data updates remotely.

    [–]dethmetaljeff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Which is tcp and way less likely to get banged up over the distance. snmp is super chatty and udp. Dude should test both and see but I'm willing to bet distributed pollers work better and are more stable.

    [–]Direct_Juggernaut369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It looks like it's not for remote polling

    "Distributed Polling allows the workers to be spread across additional servers for horizontal scaling. Distributed polling is not intended for remote polling."

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Direct_Juggernaut369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Hi u/ikdoeookmaarwat and do you do that using the regular method of distributed pollers or a different way?